Supporting Files for "Collection, Collation, and Comparison of Near-Earth In Situ CME Boundaries"

The supporting files for the paper "Collection, Collation, and Comparison of Near-Earth In Situ CME Boundaries" submitted to Space Weather. The files are:

LLAMAICE_1.0.csv contains the new boundaries set by the LLAMAICE team. The columns correspond to the event number, any adjacent events that are interacting, the sheath/shock boundary, front mixed boundary, FR front, FR end, back mixed boundary, any HSS catalogs that have an entry at this time, and the comments from the team. Entries without values for a specific column have "-" to indicate a null value

otherCats_1.0.dat contains the boundaries from the source catalogs. The columns list the LLAMAICE event number, the LLAMAICE time, the source catalog, the sheath/shock boundary, FR front, FR end, and the associated coronal event. Null entries are given as ``None''

AllCases_1.0.dat combines the external catalogs and the new boundaries from the LLAMAICE team. Since the external catalogs do not use the mixed regions this file includes the LLAMAICE results split into the 4 variants A-D as necessary. The columns are the same as in \texttt{otherCats\_1.0.dat

meanData_1.0.dat contains the mean properties in the sheath and FR for every set of boundaries in AllCases_1.0.dat. The first four columns list the event number, time, catalog, and satellite. The next set of columns list the average values for B_x, B_y, B_z, B, v, T, n, and beta in the sheath. The remaining columns list the same values for the FR. Null values are listed as ``None'' and can correspond to either no sheath boundaries given for an entry or a lack of in situ measurements for that parameter.

FRfits_1.0.dat gives the results for the in situ reconstructions. The first four columns are the event number, time, catalog, and satellite for an event. This is followed by the reconstructed latitudinal angle ($\theta$), longitudinal angle ($\phi$), the signed impact parameter, the handedness, the axial magnetic field strength, the corresponding self-similar expansion time, and a goodness-of-fit metric. We note that the self-similar expansion time becomes very large when the code determines that the CME has little to no expansion.