Published January 29, 2025
| Version v1
Book chapter
Open
Writing as Language Learning
Description
Writing is increasingly recognized as a privileged site for second language (L2) learning due to its potential to foster deep linguistic processing. Unlike oral communication, writing offers permanence and time for reflection, enabling learners to notice gaps in their interlanguage and engage in metalinguistic awareness. Within this context, corrective feedback (CF) plays a crucial role in promoting language development. Empirical research demonstrates that feedback enhances accuracy in immediate revisions and can contribute to longer-term acquisition when learners actively process it. The effectiveness of CF depends on variables such as explicitness, timing, and learner characteristics (e.g., proficiency, motivation). Importantly, the learning impact of CF hinges less on its form than on how learners interact with it: deeper processing, involving noticing, comparison, and meta-reflection is essential for transforming feedback into durable gains. Recent research also explores digital and multimodal feedback, including computer-mediated and automated systems, highlighting new opportunities for individualized and collaborative engagement. Ultimately, corrective feedback, when integrated into writing tasks that encourage problem-solving and reflection, can significantly advance L2 development by fostering awareness, explicit knowledge consolidation, and gradual automatization of linguistic forms.
Files
Manchón & Cerezo_Writing as Language Learning (as published in the TESOL Encyclopedia).pdf
Files
(67.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1856e89f0e476e7f775d5d1fedf67d28
|
67.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Available
-
2025Chapter in an international scientific encyclopedia
References
- Bitchener, J. (2019). The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing. Contexts and issues (pp. 85–105). Cambridge University Press. Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (Eds.) (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights to and from writing. John Benjamins. Izumi, S. (2014). Noticing and L2 development: Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical issues. In J. M. Bergsleithner, S. N. Frota, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 25–38). National Foreign Language Resource Center. Kang, E. Y., & Han, Z. (2022). Written corrective feedback: Short-term and long-term effects on language learning. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 213–25). Routledge. Kormos, J. (2023). The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(3), 622–46. Leow, R. (2020). L2 writing-to-learn. Theory, research, and curriculum. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 95–117). John Benjamins. Leow, R., & Su, B.-R. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on L2 writing, written corrective feedback, and language learning in individual writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 9–21). Routledge. Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). John Benjamins. Manchón, R. M. (2020). Writing and language learning. Looking back and moving forward. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 3–26). John Benjamins. Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón, & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–86). de Gruyter Mouton.