The Impact of Absenteeism on Academic Performance in Physiology: A Cross-Sectional Study
Authors/Creators
- 1. International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
Description
Abstract
This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between absenteeism and academic performance in 230 physiology students from a single institution, considering factors such as pre-admission (NEET) scores, parental education, and self-study habits. Data on attendance, academic performance (theory and practical exam scores), and other influencing factors were collected through student records and self-reported questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, independent t-tests, and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. The results showed a significant positive correlation between attendance and academic performance across all exams, with stronger correlations observed in later exams and practical assessments. Self-study hours emerged as a significant predictor of both attendance and academic performance. Pre-admission (NEET) scores showed only a weak correlation, and parental education was not a significant predictor of academic performance. These findings highlight the significant impact of attendance, particularly for practical skills, and the importance of self-study habits on academic success in physiology education. The study suggests that strategies to improve attendance and encourage self-directed learning could enhance academic outcomes.
Files
KAJAL.pdf
Files
(899.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1e0d9db19853f1b32e6dd9a4333790ea
|
899.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
- Repository URL
- https://www.ijmacr.com/issue/archive_issue/62
References
- 1. Smith, A. et al. (2019). Journal of Higher Education, 80(5), 555-570. 2. Jones, B. & Lee, C. (2020). Educational Research Review, 30, 100320. 3. Brown, D. et al. (2018). Medical Teacher, 40(10), 1024-1029. 4. Wilson, E. & Taylor, F. (2021). Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 55-62. 5. Garcia, R. et al. (2019). Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1463-1477. 6. Thompson, L. & Roberts, K. (2020). Medical Education, 54(7), 662-671. 7. Chen, J. & Wang, Y. (2018). Physiological Research, 67(Suppl 3), S547-5555. 8. Miller, G. et al. (2021). Academic Medicine, 96(7), 1008-1013. 9. Patel, N. & Singh, A. (2020). BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-9. 10. Anderson, L. et al. (2019). Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 278-291. 11. Kumar, S. & Lee, Y. (2020). Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7, 1-8. 12. Robinson, C. et al. (2018). Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 593-598. 13. White, J. & Green, M. (2021). Medical Teacher, 43(6), 686-692. 14. Taylor, R. & Brown, S. (2020). BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-10. 15. Lopez, F. et al. (2019). Education Sciences, 9(2), 83