Published December 31, 2025 | Version 1.0
Journal Open

Evaluating the Modified Aldrete Score for Pediatric Recovery and Discharge Readiness: A Systematic Review of Evidence

Authors/Creators

  • 1. PGICH, Noida, India

Contributors

  • 1. Department of Child Health Nursing, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur College of Nursing, New Delhi, India
  • 2. Department of Paediatrics Anaesthesia PGICH, NOIDA, India
  • 3. AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Description

 Background: Safe recovery following anaesthesia in children is critical due to unique physiological and developmental vulnerabilities. The Modified Aldrete Score (MAS), originally developed for adults, is widely used to determine readiness for discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). However, its applicability to paediatric populations remains uncertain. Aim: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MAS in assessing recovery and predicting outcomes in paediatric PACU patients, compared with alternative discharge criteria. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published between 2009 and 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and reviews reporting on MAS use in paediatric populations. Data were extracted on study characteristics, comparators, and outcomes including PACU length of stay, discharge readiness, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and AMSTAR-2. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Evidence showed MAS reduced PACU length of stay compared with time-based criteria and was associated with fewer complications and unplanned ICU transfers. Compared with the Fast-Track Criteria (FTC) and Modified Post-Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS), MAS was more efficient but less comprehensive, as it excludes pain, nausea, and behavioural recovery markers. Paediatric-specific studies emphasized its practicality but questioned its validity across developmental stages. Conclusion: MAS is a reliable and efficient tool for paediatric PACU discharge, particularly in resource-limited settings, though paediatric-specific adaptations or hybrid models are needed to optimize safety and recovery assessment.

Files

Files (152.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:250b1812c8e10c3469a04a44b02076a3
152.6 kB Download

Additional details

Dates

Available
2025-12-31

References

  • 1. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth. 1995, 7(1):89–91.
  • 2. Whitaker R, Grant IS. Standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery. Anaesthesia. 2013, 68(1):82–9.
  • 3. Moro ET, Godoy RC, Leme FC, De Oliveira FS. Applicability of the Aldrete score in PACU discharge. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009, 59 (3):303–10.
  • 4. Misquithe JC, Misquithe SJ, Thomas J. Comparison of discharge criteria after general anesthesia in Indian patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2024, 68(2):123–9.
  • 5. Aggarwal R, Sethi N, Singh T. Comparative assessment of Modified Aldrete Score, Fast-Track Criteria, and Time-Based criteria. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2024, 40(1):56–62.
  • 6. Dahak JS, Waghmare A. Modified Aldrete Score versus Fast-Track Criteria for recovery assessment: a narrative review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2024, 18(3):AE01–AE06.
  • 7. Yamaguchi D, Suzuki S, Nishizawa T, et al. Discharge standards after sedative endoscopy: a propensity score–matched study of MPADSS vs Modified Aldrete Score. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022, 22(1):101–8.
  • 8. Roelandt P, Demedts I, De Pauw L, et al. Implementation of the Aldrete score after procedural sedation reduces recovery time: a prospective observational study. Endosc Int Open. 2022, 10(5): E609–15.
  • 9. Cohen MM, Cameron CB. Pediatric anesthesia morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2018, 126(2):673–9.
  • 10. Ryals M, Raymond J, Younge E. Pediatric post-anesthesia care unit discharge criteria: a scoping review protocol. J Clin Nurs. 2017, 26 (23–24):4532–41.
  • 11. Bizuneh YB, Admasu A, Tadele H. Practices of post-anesthesia care unit discharge in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018, 28(6): 709–16.
  • 12. Bizuneh YB, Tadele H, Alemayehu A. Enhancing post-anesthesia care outcomes through standardized discharge scoring. Int J Surg Open. 2020, 24:1–6.
  • 13. Burke M, Kyker KA. Post-anesthesia monitoring and patient discharge. J PerianesthNurs. 2013, 28(6):389–95.
  • 14. Sakata Y, Fukuda T, Matsumoto K, et al. Comparison of Modified Aldrete Score and MPADSS in endoscopy discharge. J Anesth. 2022, 36(4):513–20.
  • 15. Valasareddy SK, Ramachandran R, Sharma V, et al. Recovery profile using Modified Aldrete Score after desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2018, 62(5):373–8.
  • 16. Banerjee S, Pandey M. Comparison of Modified Aldrete Score and Fast-Track Criteria after laparoscopic surgery in Indian adults. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018, 6(2):567–72.
  • 17. Polite DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.
  • 18. Best JW, Kahn JV. Research in education. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1992.
  • 19. Evans R, Thomas J. Aldrete scoring and PACU discharge. Br J Nurs. 2017, 26(15):870–6.
  • 20. White PF, Song D. New criteria for fast-tracking after outpatient anesthesia: comparison with Modified Aldrete's Scoring System. Anesth Analg. 2016,122(3):872–8.
  • 21. Pandey M, Gupta A, Banerjee S. Modified Aldrete score versus fast-track criteria for assessing recovery from general anaesthesia in Indian adults. Indian J Anaesth. 2015, 59(12):857–63.
  • 22. Dowling J, Marshall R, Cohen J. Evolution of the Aldrete scoring system and its relevance today. AANA J. 2015, 83(6):421–7.
  • 23. Margaret H, Thomas J, Wilson S. Universal use of the Aldrete score in PACU: a systematic appraisal. J PerioperPract. 2013, 23(7–8):170–5.
  • 24. Prates A, et al. Post-anesthetic recovery and discharge readiness: challenges in criteria standardization. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021, 71(2):190–7.
  • 25. Odundo RA, et al. Utilization of the Aldrete Score in post-anesthesia monitoring: a Kenyan experience. Afr Health Sci. 2020, 20(3):1173–80.
  • 26. Lee A, Gin T. Safety of discharge after pediatric anesthesia: review of recovery scores. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020, 30(4):394–402.
  • 27. Stufflebeam DL. The CIPP model for evaluation. In: Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2002, 279–317.
  • 28. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.
  • 29. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, editors. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3. London: Cochrane; 2022.
  • 30. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2014.
  • 31. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies. BMJ. 2017, 358:j4008.