Published December 31, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Table 10 in A taxonomic revision of the whitefish of lakes Brienz and Thun, Switzerland, with descriptions of four new species (Teleostei, Coregonidae)

  • 1. Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland & Aquatic Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
  • 2. Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Biogeochemistry, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland & Aquabios GmbH, Les Fermes 57, 1792 Cordast, Switzerland

Description

Table 10. The first- and second-best ratios retrieved from the LDA ratio extractor of either head or body characters (see Table 1) alone or combined, used for pair-wise comparisons of all contemporary specimens from the six whitefish species of Lake Thun. For some comparisons only a subset of characters could be used (a-d); the respective characters that were excluded are listed at the end of the table. Only external characters were used for the LDA comparisons, since internal characters (gill raker and gill arch length) cannot be measured on live specimens, and are thus not informative to assign specimens to species in the field. Additionally, species were combined to find first- and second-best ratios that distinguish one species or a combination of species vs. all other species. For multi-species comparisons, only the comparisons that yielded distinguishing ratios are shown. δ is a measure of how good shape discriminates in comparison to size (i.e., the smaller δ the less allometry). Ratios marked with an asterisk * have very little (for the pairwise species comparisons not more than one specimen of one species overlaps with the other species) or no overlap and were thus eligible for use in the species key and the diagnoses.

CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (Shape vs. size)
head + bodyC. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: CD/UJ *0.96-1.291.36-1.6518.090.1
2: AdFB/ES5.54-13.542.87-5.9417.490.1
bodyC. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: CD/DHL *0.44-0.540.54-0.625.980.26
2: DFB/AdFB1.6-2.662.31-4.024.860.31
headC. albellus vs. C. alpinus1: UJ/ES6.48-16.014.52-7.9360.22
2: HL/UJ2.88-3.473.33-4.115.260.25
head + bodyC. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: TL/EH21.93-27.5721.91-29.463.070.08
2: PelvF/PecF10.87-1.030.87-1.072.890.08
bodyC. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: PecF1/TL0.12-0.160.11-0.151.40.19
2: DFAe/DFAd0.88-10.9-0.981.180.21
headC. albellus vs. C. fatioi1: EH/HL0.21-0.260.2-0.251.630.08
2: LJW/ES2.14-7.791.59-8.181.350.1
head + bodyC. albellus vs. C. steinmanni1: CD/UJ *0.96-1.291.36-1.5513.80.12
2: AdFB/ES5.54-13.543.31-6.31130.12
headC. albellus vs. C. steinmanni1: HL/UJ2.88-3.473.33-3.975.30.21
2: LJ/ES8.25-20.336.65-12.454.590.23
head + bodyC. albellus vs. C. profundus1: CL/EC *1.97-2.871.56-2.0913.190.03
2: DHL/M2.77-3.533.21-3.7912.790.03
bodyC. albellus vs. C. profundus1: CL/DHL0.75-1.040.61-0.824.430.06
2: CD/BD0.26-0.310.28-0.343.380.07
headC. albellus vs. C. profundus1: EC/UJ0.74-0.950.87-1.055.020.1
2: SW/ES3.22-9.672.31-5.264.050.12
head + bodyC. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: AdFB/ES5.54-13.543.31-6.59.130.06
2: CD/UJW1.14-1.791.4-28.690.07
bodyC. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF1/CD2.13-2.761.8-2.394.50.11
2: DFB/AdFB1.6-2.661.98-3.453.880.13
headC. albellus vs. C. acrinasus1: UJW/ES5.27-13.653.22-7.964.190.14
2: ED/UJ0.66-0.840.74-0.93.510.16
CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. Size)
head + bodyC. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: CD/PostD *0.17-0.210.14-0.1722.730.07
2: DFAe/UJ3.14-3.932.43-3.4122.330.07
bodyC. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: CD/PostD *0.17-0.210.14-0.178.980.17
2: DFAe/DHL1.26-1.551.02-1.367.90.19
headC. alpinus vs. C. fatioi1: HD/UJ2.34-2.92.13-2.573.860.3
2: MW/ES1.47-31.82-6.163.150.34
head + bodyC. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni (a)ED/EC0.74-0.90.74-0.98.070.05
CD/CL0.6-0.750.54-0.78.020.05
bodyC. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni1: DFAe/AFAe1.5-1.831.43-1.625.70.06
2: PelvFS/DFAe0.24-0.360.29-0.375.580.07
headC. alpinus vs. C. steinmanni1: EC/SW1.47-2.131.43-1.72.450.16
2: ED/EC0.74--0.90.79-0.92.20.18
head + bodyC. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.54-0.620.4-0.4919.860.07
2: PecF2/CF0.63-0.820.74-0.9019.010.07
bodyC. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.54-0.620.4-0.499.310.15
2: PecF2/CF0.63-0.820.74-0.907.320.19
headC. alpinus vs. C. profundus1: EH/PostD0.09-0.110.11-0.154.320.21
2: SD/UJW0.35-0.510.30-0.443.930.23
head + bodyC. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/LJ0.95-1.110.79-165.210.02
2: CF/M *5.55-6.554.4-5.5765.130.02
bodyC. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/DHL0.54-0.620.46-0.584.690.25
2: DFAe/DFPe3.39-4.722.84-4.543.910.29
headC. alpinus vs. C. acrinasus1: PostO/M2.4-32.17-2.564.260.21
2: HD/MW6.57-8.76.02-8.873.650.24
CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. Size)
head + bodyC. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni (b)1: CD/UJ *1.02-1.341.36-1.5533.960.04
2: PelvF/PAdC0.73-10.84-0.133.710.04
bodyC. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni1: CD/PostD *0.14-0.170.17-0.206.340.22
2: DHL/BD0.5-0.70.45-0.585.370.25
headC. fatioi vs. C. steinmanni1: HD/UJ2.13-2.572.42-2.834.410.23
2: HW/LJW3.17-6.123.72-5.13.250.29
head + bodyC. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: CL/EC1.84-2.981.56-2.0910.030.02
2: DHL/UJ2.11-2.702.32-2.929.540.02
bodyC. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: CL/DHL0.76-1.040.61-0.824.44<0.01
2: DFPe/CD0.56-0.870.56.0.823.2<0.01
headC. fatioi vs. C. profundus1: EC/SW1.32-1.731.63-2.385.050.08
2: UJ/UJW1.04-1.501-1.294.280.09
head + bodyC. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/PostD0.14-0.170.16-0.28.30.05
2: ED/SW1.08-1.51.3-1.7980.05
bodyC. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/PostD0.14-0.170.16-0.23.660.07
2: AFAe/DHL0.69-0.90.61-0.932.930.09
headC. fatioi vs. C. acrinasus1: ED/SW1.08-1.51.3-1.793.050.15
2: MW/ES1.82-6.161.4-3.022.450.18
CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. Size)
head + bodyC. steinmanni vs. C. profundus (c)1: CD/DHL *0.53-0.630.4-0.4923.90.05
2: CL/IOW2.05-2.691.69-2.2823.30.05
bodyC. steinmanni vs. C. profundus1: CD/DHL *0.53-0.630.4-0.499.130.14
2: PecF2/DFAe0.76-0.960.82-1.217.440.17
headC. steinmanni vs. C. profundus1: SW/UJW0.65-0.800.54-0.695.90.12
2: EH/PostO0.36-0.470.41-0.525.370.13
head + bodyC. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus (d)1: CD/M *1.86-2.241.4-1.9160.64<0.01
2: PostD/LJ4.96-5.94.65-5.43160.6<0.01
bodyC. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus1: CD/DHL0.53-0.630.46-0.584.460.23
2: PelvF/DHL1.08-1.260.95-1.163.830.26
headC. steinmanni vs. C. acrinasus1: ED/HD0.29-0.330.31-0.374.540.13
2: HL/M4.6-5.534.21-5.173.410.17
CharactersSpecies comparisonBest ratiosRange species 1Range species 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. Size)
head + bodyC. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF2/CD2.37-3.161.91-2.5913.460.01
2: LJ/UJW1.34-1.861.54-2.2713.120.01
bodyC. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: PecF2/CD2.37-3.161.91-2.594.580.05
2: DHL/TL0.13-0.150.12-0.133.480.06
headC. profundus vs. C. acrinasus1: M/UJW0.69-0.940.8-1.224.450.02
2: EC/LJ0.66-0.810.58-0.723.880.02
CharactersMulitple species comparisonBest ratiosRange group 1Range group 2Standard distanceδ (shape vs. Size)
head + bodyC. alpinus + C. steinmanni vs. 4 other species1: CD/UJ *1.36-1.650.96-1.435.340.24

(a) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, DFAe, DFPe, TL, SL, EH, SD, SW, INW, IOW (b) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL (c) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL,EH (d) PelvFS, PecF1, DFAd, TL, EH, ES, EC

Notes

Published as part of Selz, Oliver M., Doenz, Carmela J., Vonlanthen, Pascal & Seehausen, Ole, 2020, A taxonomic revision of the whitefish of lakes Brienz and Thun, Switzerland, with descriptions of four new species (Teleostei, Coregonidae), pp. 129 in ZooKeys 989 on page 129, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.989.32822

Files

Files (29.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dcc4ac460732101b03700d7fd7950517
29.5 kB Download

System files (60.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:aa249469b24d9f264f1ac3a7ce1ae030
60.1 kB Download

Additional details