Importance of Palatal Rugae, Denture Labelling, Dental Implants and Lip Prints in Forensic Odontology
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Identification is crucial in ensuring justice within medicolegal investigations. In the realm of law enforcement, forensic odontology plays an essential role in victim identification. In complex cases where other investigative methods fail, dental identification becomes a primary resource. When a victim's natural teeth have been replaced with prosthetics, the prosthodontist's role in forensic odontology is particularly important. Investigations can be conducted by examining the labels on dentures and other dental appliances. Consequently, this field is gaining increasing recognition today. This paper provides an overview of the available literature that illustrates how prosthodontists can significantly aid in the identification of unidentified bodies.
Files
JIBIN.pdf
Files
(838.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:376db26029a8c9105897cc1ceebda561
|
838.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Verma AK, Kumar S, Rathore S, Pandey A. Role of dental expert in forensic odontology. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;5(1):2-5. PMID: 25298709; PMCID: PMC4178350 2. O'Shangnessy PE. Introduction to forensic science. Dent Clin North Am. 2001; 45:217–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]. 3. Rothwell BR. Principles of dental identification. Dent Clin North Am. 2001;45:253–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]. 4. Avon SL. Forensic odontology: the roles and responsibilities of the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 Jul-Aug;70(7):453-8. [PubMed]. 5. Rai B, Anand SC. Role of forensic odontology in Tsunami disasters. Internet J Forensic Sci. 2007;2:1–5. [Google Scholar] 6. Thomas CJ, van Wyk CW. The palatal rugae in identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1988;6:21–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 7. Caldasa IM, Magalhaesbcd T, Afonsoa A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8. Lysell L. Plicae palatinae transversae and papilla incisiva in man: A morphologic and genetic study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13(Suppl 18):5–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9. Goswami R, Garg R, Jolly R. Role of prosthodontics in forensic odontology. Int J Clin Dent Sci. 2011;2:85–9. [Google Scholar]. 10. McGivney J. Marking of removable dentures. In: Averill DC, editor. Manual of Forensic Odontology. 2nd ed. USA: American Society of Forensic Science; 1991. pp. 62–6. [Google Scholar 11. Toolson LB, Taylor TD. Method for denture identification. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:114–5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 12. Ling BC. A white character denture labeling technique. J Prosthet Dent. 199;;9:545. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90175-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13. Coss P, Wolfaardt JF. Denture identification system. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:551–2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80362-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 14. Ibrahim WM. Denture microlabeling technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:104. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90351-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15. Ryan LD, Keller JB, Rogers DE, Schaeffer L. Clear acrylic resin T-bar used in denture identification. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:189–90. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90017-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16. Berry FA, Logan GI, Plata R, Riegel R. A post fabrication technique fordentification of prosthetic devices. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:341–3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80328-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17. Ling BC. Computer-printer denture microlabeling system. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:363–4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70256-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18. Reeson MG. A simple and inexpensive inclusion technique for denture identification. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:441–2. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001. 118565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 19. Rajan M, Julian R. A new method of marking dentures using microchips. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2002;20:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 20. Matsumura H, Shimoe S. Incorporation of a cast, embossed identification plate into a partial denture framework. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:215–7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.127954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar 21. Stevenson RB. Marking dentures for identification. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:255. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90188-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 22. Dimashkieh MR, Al-Shammery AR. Engraved fixed restorations to facilitate identification in forensic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:533–5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90166-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 23. Berketa J, James H, Marino V. A pilot study in the recovery and recognition of non- osseointegrated dental implants following cremation. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29:38–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 24. Michelinakis G, Sharrock A, Barclay CW. Identification of dental implants through the use of Implant Recognition Software (IRS). Int Dent J. 2006 Aug;56(4):203-8. 25. Nuzzolese E, Lusito S, Solarino B, Di Vella G. Radiographic dental implants recognition for geographic evaluation in human identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2008 Jun 1;26(1):8-11. PMID: 22689351. 26. Berketa J, James H, Marino V. Survival of batch numbers within dental implants following incineration as an aid to identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2010 Dec 1;28(1):1-4. PMID: 21239857. 27. Randhawa K, Narang RS, Arora PC. Study of the effect of age changes on lip print pattern and its reliability in sex determination. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29:45–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 28. Prabhu RV, Dinkar AD, Prabhu VD, Rao PK. Cheiloscopy: Revisited. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4:47–52. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.99167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 29. Utsuno H, Kanoh T, Tadokoro O, Inoue K. Preliminary study of post mortem identification using lip prints. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;149:129–32. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar 30. Williams TR. Lip prints: Another means of identification. J Forensic Indent. 1991;41:190–4. [Google Scholar] 31. Ball J. The current status of lip prints and their use for identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2002;20:43–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 32. Prabhu RV, Dinkar AD, Prabhu VD. Collection of lip prints as a forensic evidence at the crime scene: An insight. J Oral Health Res. 2010;1:129–35. [Google Scholar] 33. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. A new attempt of personal identification by means of lip print. Can Soc Forensic Sci. 1971;4:154–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar. 34. Sivapathasundaram B, Prakesh PA, Siva Kumar G. Lip prints (Cheiloscopy) Indian Dent Res. 2001;12:234–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 35. Prabhu RV, Dinkar AD, Prabhu VD, Rao PK. Cheiloscopy: Revisited. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4:47–52. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.99167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 36. Kasprzak J. Possibilities of cheiloscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 1990;46:145–51. [Google Scholar] 37. Millet C, Jeannin C. Incorporation of microchips to facilitate denture identification by radio frequency tagging. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:588–90. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]