Published December 23, 2025 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Melinnopsis nathanieli Gunton, Serpell-Stevens, Riaz & Horton, 2025, sp. nov.

  • 1. School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO 14 3 ZH, UK
  • 2. National Oceanography Centre Southampton, Southampton SO 14 3 ZH, UK
  • 3. School of the Environment and Life Sciences, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, Portsmouth PO 1 2 DY, UK

Description

Melinnopsis nathanieli sp. nov.

Type material.

Holotype: • One specimen; NHMUK ANEA 2025.3262, incomplete, end of abdomen missing; Atlantic, Porcupine Abyssal Plain Sustained Observatory; OTSB 14; Start 49°05.43'N, 016°53.02'W, End 49°01.12'N, 016°57.87'W; depth 4843–4848 m; 17/05/23–18/05/23; RRS James Cook Cruise 247, Station 056; COI PX 149846, 16 S PX 169426. Paratypes: Total six specimens. • NHMUK ANEA 2025.3263; NHMUK ANEA 2025.3264, complete specimen; Atlantic, Porcupine Abyssal Sustained Observatory; OTSB 14; Start 48°51.21'N, 016°51.45'W, End 48°57.45'N, 016°51.85'W; depth 4831–4838 m; 07/06/24–08/06/24; RRS James Cook Cruise 263, Station 071. • NHMUK ANEA 2025.3265, buccal tentacle extended 10 mm; NHMUK ANEA 2025.3266; NHMUK ANEA 2025.3267 (SEM specimen); NHMUK ANEA 2025.3268 (SEM specimen), complete specimen broken in two fragments; Atlantic, Porcupine Abyssal Plain Sustained Observatory; OTSB 14; Start 48°54.03'N, 016°49.26'W, End 49°00.70'N, 016°50.22'W; depth 4835–4836 m; 06/06/24–07/06/24; RRS James Cook Cruise 263, Station 069.

Other material examined.

Total 35 specimens. • DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-003; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-004; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-005; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-006 (COI PX 149845; 16 S PX 169425; 18 S PX 169420); DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-007; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-008; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-009 (COI PX 149844; 16 S PX 169424; 18 S PX 169419); DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-010; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-011 (COI PX 149843; 16 S PX 169423; 18 S PX 169418); DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-012; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-013 (COI PX 149842; 18 S PX 169417); DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-014; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-015 (COI PX 149841; 16 S PX 169422; 18 S PX 169416); DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-016; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-018; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-019; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-020; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-021; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-022; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-023; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-024; DISCOLL -JC 247-056-POLY-025; all same collection data as for holotype. • DISCOLL -JC 247-051-POLY-039; Atlantic, Porcupine Abyssal Plain Sustained Observatory; OTSB 14; Start 49°02.63'N, 016°56.95'W, End 48°58.10'N, 016°57.81'W; depth 4844–4846 m; 16/05/23-15/05/23; RRS James Cook Cruise 247, Station 051. • DISCOLL -JC 263-069-POLY-033; DISCOLL -JC 263-069-POLY-034; DISCOLL -JC 263-069-POLY-035; DISCOLL -JC 263-069-POLY-036; DISCOLL -JC 263-069-POLY-037; Atlantic, Porcupine Abyssal Plain Sustained Observatory; OTSB 14; Start 48°54.03'N, 016°49.26'W, End 49°00.70'N, 016°50.22'W; depth 4835–4836 m; 06/06/24–07/06/24; RRS James Cook Cruise 263, Station 069. • DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-023, complete specimen (5 branchiae); DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-024 (16 S PX 16942); DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-025, 2 fragments; DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-027; DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-028; DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-029; DISCOLL -JC 263-071-POLY-030; Atlantic, Porcupine Abyssal Plain Sustained Observatory; OTSB 14; Start 48°51.21'N, 016°51.45'W, End 48°57.45'N, 016°51.85'W; depth 4831–4838 m; 07/06/24–08/06/24; RRS James Cook Cruise 263, Station 071.

Additional comparative material.

BMNH 1885.12.1.330, holotype of Melinnopsis atlantica McIntosh, 1885, off Chesapeake Bay, North America, 37°25.002'N, 71°40.002'W, HMS Challenger, Stn. 44, 1700 fathoms (3109 m), 02 / 05 / 1873, 2 short anterior fragments, 1 posterior fragment and ~ 9 tube fragments.

Description.

(based on holotype NHMUK ANEA 2025.3262) Holotype 35 mm length for more than 25 chaetigers, widest at post-branchial region 2 mm, thereafter gradually tapering to abdomen (1 mm width) (Fig. 3 A). Thorax with 16 or 17 chaetigers (lower thorax damaged so exact number of chaetigers uncertain). Neurochaetae as small acicular spines on segments II – V and uncini on remaining> 21 chaetigers.

Prostomium with well-defined anterior and posterior sections separated by a pair of deep transverse nuchal slits meeting mid-dorsally (Fig. 3 D). Anterior part of prostomium whole, without any distinct lobes, and with a slightly raised lip. No eyespots or pigmented glandular bands present. No speckled pigment on anterior part of prostomium. Segment I continued ventrally forming lower margin of mouth with no crenulations on the ventral side (Fig. 3 B).

Buccal tentacles in holotype missing, only one large stump remaining.

Lateral wings of anterior body between prostomium and segment V slightly arched, peak approx. segment IV (Figs 3 E, 4 B).

Segment I collar-like, laterally and ventrally encompassing head region. Branchiae emerging together on dorsal branchial ridge at level of segment II, arranged in two basally fused groups of four, three branchiae in front and one situated slightly behind (towards the anterior) (Figs 4 A, 5 A), the latter being the longest pair. Inner- and anteriormost branchia of each group completely separate, not joined by membrane. Branchiae in cross-section circular to slightly flattened smooth with central groove, gently tapering to filiform tips. Post-branchial dorsal membrane inconspicuous (Fig. 5 A).

Post-branchial hooks absent. Segmentation visible dorsally in post-branchial area. No visible nephridial papillae.

Notochaetae from segment IV, neurochaetae from segment II (Figs 4 B, 5 B).

Capillary notochaetae starting from segment IV present in 12 or 13 thoracic chaetigers (lower thorax damaged exact number of chaetigers uncertain). Chaetiger 3 (segment IV) with few fine notochaetal capillaries and chaetiger 4 (segment V) with more abundant fine notochaeta arising from small slightly projecting notopodia (Fig. 5 B). Short cylindrical notopodia with thicker capillaries evident from chaetiger 5. Notochaetae arranged in double rows, those of anterior rows shorter.

Rudimental abdominal notopodia missing. No small, rounded projections, evident in notopodial positions, no cilia observed.

Neurochaetae as small acicular spines with lanceolate tips on segments II – V. Neuropodial uncini from chaetiger 5 (segment VI) (Fig. 5 B), present in 12 thoracic uncinigers and abdominal chaetigers. Holotype incomplete with ~ 15 abdominal uncinigers.

Thoracic uncini emerging subdistally on short flaps from chaetigers 5 to approximately chaetiger 11 (Figs 3 F, 5 C). Abdominal uncini mostly missing in holotype but arranged on narrow lappets (Fig. 5 E).

Uncini of thoracic uncinigers with three teeth (two small, one larger) in one vertical row over rostral tooth, subrostral process and basal prow (Figs 3 G, 5 D).

Thoracic uncini in a single line with ~ 70 uncini (Fig. 5 C).

Abdominal uncini in a single line with ~ 16 uncini (Fig. 5 E).

Pygidium missing in holotype.

Methyl blue staining pattern. Use of methyl blue in holotype reveals weak staining of prostomium. Posterior section of prostomium with speckled staining (Fig. 3 B). Strong staining transversely on segments I – IV (Fig. 3 A). Branchiae very lightly speckled. No clear lateral staining. Strong staining of ~ 13 or 14 ventral shields, staining strong in anterior section of ventral shield, light staining of posterior section of shield. This pattern is more defined towards the posterior of the worm. Shields do not cover entire ventral surface of the segment, stopping short at the uncini (Fig. 3 B).

Tube. Missing in holotype.

Variations.

Variation in other specimens up to 48 mm length for more than 60 chaetigers, widest at post-branchial region 3 mm, thereafter gradually tapering to abdomen (1 mm width) and pygidium. Thorax with 16 chaetigers; neurochaetae as small acicular spines on segments II – V and uncini on remaining> 56 chaetigers.

One large buccal tentacle (≤ 15 mm), edges of tentacle undulate in small folds (Fig. 3 C). Four smaller tentacles (2 pairs) ridged and smooth measuring ~ 1 mm length.

Branchiae ~ 1 / 5 the length of longest buccal tentacle.

Thirteen thoracic uncini from chaetiger 5–17. Some specimens with ≤ 49 abdominal uncinigers.

Uncini lappets decreasing in size until pygidium, minute at the end. First abdominal neuropodia widely separated, more closely spaced towards the pygidium, last seven neuropodia very close together.

Uncini of abdominal uncinigers with numerous teeth over rostral tooth, subrostral process and basal prow (Fig. 5 F).

Terminal crenulated anus, bounded by four, small indistinct lobes. No anal cirri (Fig. 5 G).

Methyl blue staining pattern: staining of post-branchial region laterally (mid-dorsal region not stained) until chaetiger 8. Staining of 13 ventral shields. Abdominal staining light. No staining of dorsal side of neuropodial lappets.

Tube: fine-grained sediment tube with some foraminifera encrusted. The tube is lined with a thin, clear membrane. Length of tube ≤ 30 cm (Fig. 6 B).

Ecology.

Found in association with the actiniarians Actinauge abyssorum Carlgren, 1934 and Amphianthus bathybium Hertwig, 1882, and the ascidian Culeolus sp. Herdman, 1881 (Fig. 6 A, B, C). The worm tubes are grasped by the pedal disc of the Actiniaria (Fig. 6 A, C).

Distribution.

Porcupine Abyssal Plain, northeast Atlantic, 4843–4850 m.

Etymology.

The new species is named for the second author’s son, Nathaniel Serpell-Stevens.

Remarks.

Melinnopsis nathanieli sp. nov. is morphologically very similar to M. chadwicki and M. gardelli from the eastern Australian margin. Melinnopsis nathanieli sp. nov. differs from these two species in having lateral wings that are slightly arched rather than highly arched, and possessing fewer abdominal uncini: only 16 in a row in M. nathanieli sp. nov. versus 30 in both M. gardelli and M. chadwicki. Melinnopsis gardelli also exhibits a ‘ conspicuous stained band on the dorsal area when stained with methyl blue’ which was not observed in M. nathanieli sp. nov. Two other species of Melinnopsis have been described from the Atlantic (Table 4), M. angolensis and the type species, M. atlantica. Melinnopsis nathanieli sp. nov. differs from M. angolensis in lacking a dorsal serrated membrane on segment V (present in M. angolensis) and the possession of three teeth above the rostral tooth in the thoracic uncini (two teeth in M. angolensis).

Melinnopsis nathanieli sp. nov. differs from M. atlantica in lacking a dorsal membrane between segments IV and V (present in M. atlantica) and possessing a flexible tube composed of fine sediment with few attached foraminifera (cylindrical tube rigid and composed of greyish sediment with many foraminifera attached in M. atlantica). Furthermore, the depth distribution differs between the two species, M. atlantica was recovered from 1700 fms (3109 m), whereas M. nathanieli sp. nov. was collected from 4843–4850 m.

Since its description in 1885 there has only been a single additional report of M. atlantica (OBIS 2025), a specimen collected from the Golfe de Gascogne / Bay of Biscay, northeast Atlantic in 1973 at 1180 m (Olu et al. 2025). It is unclear whether this specimen is M. atlantica or potentially another new species. We suggest that due to the differences in depth and geographical location, it is likely to be a different species and M. atlantica is not distributed in the northeast Atlantic

Unfortunately, our holotype specimen was incomplete with the end of the abdomen missing. Most of the specimens collected in 2023 and 2024, which were fixed in ethanol and suitable for genetic analysis, were in poor condition, often missing the posterior end. We selected the holotype based on condition of the specimen and availability of genetic data.

Notes

Published as part of Gunton, Laetitia M., Serpell-Stevens, Amanda, Riaz, Kashaf & Horton, Tammy, 2025, A new species of Melinnopsis (Annelida, Melinnidae) from the Porcupine Abyssal Plain, northeast Atlantic, pp. 1-23 in ZooKeys 1265 on pages 1-23, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1265.171206

Files

Files (12.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:90b70f5f5f799ac62d2721ffe9fa8981
12.6 kB Download

System files (114.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e1aed0364d8de1c16bdfbf830df9b3bb
114.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
DISCOLL , NHMUK
Material sample ID
DISCOLL-JC 247-051-POLY-039 , DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-003, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-004, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-005, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-006, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-007, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-008, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-009, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-010, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-011, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-012, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-013, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-014, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-015, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-016, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-018, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-019, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-020, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-021, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-022, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-023, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-024, DISCOLL-JC 247-056-POLY-025 , DISCOLL-JC 263-069-POLY-033, DISCOLL-JC 263-069-POLY-034, DISCOLL-JC 263-069-POLY-035, DISCOLL-JC 263-069-POLY-036, DISCOLL-JC 263-069-POLY-037 , DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-023, DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-024, DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-025, DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-027, DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-028, DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-029, DISCOLL-JC 263-071-POLY-030 , NHMUK ANEA 2025.3262 , NHMUK ANEA 2025.3263, NHMUK ANEA 2025.3264 , NHMUK ANEA 2025.3265, NHMUK ANEA 2025.3266, NHMUK ANEA 2025.3267, NHMUK ANEA 2025.3268, OTSB 14
Scientific name authorship
Gunton & Serpell-Stevens & Riaz & Horton
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Annelida
Order
Terebellida
Family
Melinnidae
Genus
Melinnopsis
Species
nathanieli
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Type status
holotype , paratype
Taxonomic concept label
Melinnopsis nathanieli Gunton, Serpell-Stevens, Riaz & Horton, 2025

References

  • McIntosh WC (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Zoology 12 (part 34): I - XXXVI, 1 - 554 [pls 1 - 55, 1 A- 39 A, & Annelida stations map].
  • Huvenne V (2024) RRS James Cook cruise 237, 06 AUG- 04 SEP 2022. CLASS – Climate-linked Atlantic Sector Science Whittard Canyon and Porcupine Abyssal Plain Fixed-Point Observatories. Southampton, National Oceanography Centre. (National Oceanography Centre Research Expedition Report, 80). https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536754
  • Carlgren O (1934) Ceriantharia, Zoantharia and Actiniaria from the " Michael Sars " North Atlantic Deep-sea Expedition 1910. Report on the Scientific Results of the " Michael Sars " North Atlantic Deep-Sea Expedition 1910 5 (6): 1 - 27.
  • Hertwig R (1882) Die Actinien der Challenger Expedition. Gustav Fischer. Jena, 119 pp.
  • Herdman WA (1881) Preliminary report on the Tunicata of the Challenger expedition. Cynthiidae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 11 (3): 52-88. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/48710941
  • Gunton LM, Kupriyanova E, Alvestad T (2020) Two new deep-water species of Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the eastern Australian continental margin. Records of the Australian Museum 72 (4): 101–121. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.72.2020.1763
  • Hilbig B (2005) Melinnopsis angolensis (Annelida: Polychaeta: Ampharetidae), a new species from the Angola Basin. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (Suppl. 1): 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2004.11.005
  • Hartman O (1969) Atlas of the sedentariate polychaetous annelids from California. 1 - 812. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California. Los Angeles.
  • Hilbig B (2005) Melinnopsis angolensis (Annelida: Polychaeta: Ampharetidae), a new species from the Angola Basin. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (Suppl. 1): 215 - 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2004.11.005
  • Uschakov PV (1952) Batipelagicheskie i glubokovrduye formy mnogoshchetinkrvykh chervei (Polychaeta) iz Rariteamchatskykh vod Tikhogo Okeana [Bathypelagic and benthic forms of Polychaeta in far Eastern Seas]. Issledovaniya dal'nevostochnykh Morei SSSR 3: 103-112.
  • Moore JP (1923) The polychaetous annelids dredged by the U. S. S. " Albatross " off the coast of southern California in 1904. IV. Spionidae to Sabellariidae. Proceedings. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 75: 179-259.
  • Reuscher M, Fiege D, Imajima M (2015) Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japanese waters. Part IV. Miscellaneous genera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95 (6): 1105–1125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415000545
  • Hoagland RA (1920) Polychaetous annelids collected by the United States fisheries steamer Albatross during the Philippine expedition of 1907 - 1909. Bulletin - United States National Museum 100 (1): 603-635.
  • Reuscher M, Fiege D, Imajima M (2015) Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japanese waters. Part IV. Miscellaneous genera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 95 (6): 1105-1125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415000545
  • Augener H (1906) Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, and on the east coast of the United States, 1877 to 1880, by the U. S. Coast Survey Steamer Blake, Lieut. Commander C. D. Sigsbee, U. S. N., and Commander J. R. Bartlett, U. S. N. commanding. 42. Westindische Polychaeten. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 43 (4): 91-196.
  • Hartman O (1960) Systematic account of some marine invertebrate animals from the deep basins off southern California. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 22 (2): 69-216.
  • Moore JP (1923) The polychaetous annelids dredged by the U. S. S. " Albatross " off the coast of southern California in 1904. IV. Spionidae to Sabellariidae. Proceedings. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 75: 179–259.
  • Wesenberg-Lund E (1950) Polychaeta. Danish Ingolf-Expedition 4 (14): 1-92.
  • Jimi N, Hookabe N, Woo SP, Fujiwara Y (2025) Taxonomy and ecological insights into Melinnopsis shinkaiae sp. nov., a polychaete with a vertical tube from the Daiichi-Kashima seamount (Northwest Pacific). Plankton & Benthos Research 20 (1): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.3800/pbr.20.29
  • Uschakov PV (1957) [On the polychaete worms fauna (Polychaeta) of the Arctic and Antarctic]. K faune mnogoshchetinkovikh chervei (Polychaeta) Arkitki i Antarktiki. Zoologicheskii jurnal [Journal of Zoology] 36 (11): 1659-1672.
  • Treadwell AL (1906) Polychaetous annelids of the Hawaiian Islands collected by the steamer Albatross in 1902. Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission 23 (3): 1145-1181.
  • Imajima M (2001) Deep-sea benthic polychaetous annelids of Tosa Bay, southwestern Japan. National Science Museum Monographs 20: 31-100.
  • OBIS (2025) Ocean Biodiversity In formation System. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO. https://obis.org [accessed 15 October 2025]
  • Olu K, Cannat M, Arnaud-Haond S, Rabouille C, Lallier F, Blandin J, Cambon-Bonavita M, Justiniano J, Sarradin P, Fouquet Y, Fabri M, Gillet H, Soubigou O, Menot L, Cotten C (2025) Biological samples from the French oceanographic fleet's deep-sea cruises. Version 1.3. IFREMER - French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea. Sampling event dataset. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.ey5ub5