Published October 30, 2025 | Version v1

Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lignocaine with 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline Among Smokers and Non-Smokers During Intra-Alveolar Mandibular Posterior Teeth Extraction

  • 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)

Description

Abstract

Introduction: Tooth extraction is one of the most frequently performed procedures by oral surgeons, and it cannot be successfully carried out without achieving adequate anesthesia. A patient-related factor hypothesized to affect anaesthetic efficacy is cigarette smoking. However, whether the anaesthetic effect of lignocaine is truly altered by cigarette smoking remains unclear. This uncertainty prompted us to evaluate the efficiency of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline in both smokers and non-smokers during the extraction of mandibular posterior teeth.

Methods: This study included patients requiring extraction of mandibular posterior teeth. It was a single-blinded, prospective observational case-control study with a total sample size of 176 patients. Participants were categorized into two groups: the study group (Group A), comprising patients with a history of cigarette smoking, and the control group (Group B), consisting of patients with no history of smoking. Data collected included past medical history, personal history (including smoking history), the volume of local anesthetic administered (in milliliters), the onset time of local anesthesia (in minutes), and pain scores.

Results: Of the 176 patients included in the study, the mean age of the patients in the study and control groups were 39 and 42 years, respectively. The mean time of onset of anesthesia in Group A and Group B was 3.53 ± 1.18 and 2.98 ± 1.006 minutes respectively. The mean volume of anaesthetic administered in Group A and Group B was 3.49 mL and 2.58 mL, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the time of onset of anesthesia between both the groups (p < 0.05), with smokers exhibiting a prolonged duration. Smokers report significantly higher pain scores compared to non-smokers (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates an altered onset of action, increased volume requirement, and elevated pain scores indicative of reduction in the efficacy of local anesthetic utilised among individuals who are smokers. Additionally, histological studies are necessary to elucidate the findings of this study and to clarify the specific effects of lignocaine in smoker versus non-smoker populations.

Files

VISHAL.pdf

Files (807.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ee4645b7e08768d7ee2d9601bdb76efe
807.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Somuri AV, Rai AB, Pillai M. Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery. 2013 Jun;12:130-2. 2. Singh P. An emphasis on the wide usage and important role of local anesthesia in dentistry: A strategic review. Dental research journal. 2012 Mar;9(2):127. 3. Locker D. Smoking and oral health in older adults. Canadian journal of public health= Revue canadienne de sante publique. 1992 Nov 1;83(6):429-32. 4. Sbaraglia M, Turnbull RS, Locker D. Risk Indicators for Periodontal Disease in a Remote Canadian Community—a Dental Practice‐based Study. Journal of public health dentistry. 2002 Mar;62(1):51-6. 5. Johnson GK, Hill M. Cigarette smoking and the periodontal patient. Journal of periodontology. 2004 Feb;75(2):196-209. 6. Furtado RD. Smoking and anesthetic implications. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 2002;52:354-67. 7. Miller LG. Recent developments in the study of the effects of cigarette smoking on clinical pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacodynamics. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1989 Aug;17(2):90-108. 8. Rodgman A, Perfetti TA. The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. CRC press; 2008 Dec 22. 9. Winn DM. Tobacco use and oral disease. Journal of dental education. 2001 Apr;65(4):306-12. 10. Jacob 3rd P, Yu L, Shulgin AT, Benowitz NL. Minor tobacco alkaloids as biomarkers for tobacco use: comparison of users of cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, cigars, and pipes. American journal of public health. 1999 May;89(5):731-6. 11. Benowitz NL, Hukkanen J, Jacob III P. Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. Nicotine psychopharmacology. 2009 Jan 1:29-60. 12. Sayhan H, Beyaz SG, Çeliktaş A. The local anesthetic and pain relief activity of alkaloids. Intech Open. 2017 Jul 12:57-84. 13. Bigiani A. Nicotine and the taste allure for salty food. Science Proceedings. 2016;3:1133. 14. Al-Noori NM, Ibraheem NS, Abdulmunem MM. The impact of cigarette smoking on the efficiency of local anesthesia during simple tooth extraction. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2021 Nov 1;33(7):674-8. 15. Shuler RL. Effect of cigarette smoking on the circulation of the oral mucosa. Journal of dental research. 1968 Nov;47(6):910-5. 16. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Subbiya A, Vivekanandhan P, Sharma V, Sharma R, Prakash V, Geethapriya N. Effect of preoperative pain on inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesthesia Progress. 2015;62(4):135.