Morphological and Chemical Characterization of Conventional MTA versus Bacterial Cellulose-Reinforced MTA Using TEM and EDX
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the morphological and elemental characteristics of conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Bacterial Cellulose-Reinforced MTA (BC-MTA) using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX).
Materials and Methods: Cylindrical molds (6 mm in diameter × 4 mm in height) were fabricated from plexiglass in accordance with ASTM E385 standards using CNC laser cutting. Two groups were evaluated: Group 1 comprised conventional MTA (MTA Plus™), and Group 2 comprised BC-MTA (Vedayukt India Pvt. Ltd.). The prepared samples were incubated under fully saturated conditions at 37°C for 24 hours. Following incubation, samples underwent morphological evaluation using TEM and elemental analysis using EDX. Statistical analysis was conducted using Student’s t-test, with results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A p-value < 0.0001 was considered highly statistically significant (α = 0.05).
Results: TEM imaging revealed distinct structural differences between MTA and BC-MTA, with BC-MTA exhibiting a more aggregated nanoparticle morphology. EDX analysis demonstrated statistically significant differences in elemental composition between the two groups (p < 0.0001), confirming the influence of bacterial cellulose incorporation on the physiochemical properties of MTA.
Conclusion: The incorporation of bacterial cellulose into MTA resulted in notable structural and elemental modifications, potentially enhancing its mechanical strength and bioactivity. These findings suggest that BC-MTA holds promise as an improved bioactive material in pediatric endodontic and restorative applications. Further clinical studies are warranted to assess its long-term efficacy and biocompatibility.
Files
V LALITHA.pdf
Files
(900.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:9d18c5c29a1e683fed5155a916a9d53a
|
900.1 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Acharya, s. Et al. (2024) 'bioactive biosilicate cements in pediatric dentistry – a review of the latest materials', journal of pharmacy and bioallied sciences, 16(suppl 2). Doi:10.4103/jpbs. jpbs_ 1235_23. 2. Abu Hasna A et al. (2022) Biological and chemical properties of five mineral oxides and of mineral trioxide aggregate repair high plasticity: an in vitro study. Scientific Reports,12(1):14123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17854-0 3. Lee, s.-j., monsef, m. And torabinejad, m. (1993) 'sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations', journal of endodontics, 19(11), pp. 541–544. Doi:10.1016/ s0099-2399(06)81282-3. 4. Fuks AB. (2002) Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. European journal of paediatric dentistry ;3(3):115-120. 5. Tawil PZ et al. (2015) MTA: A clinical review. The Compendium on continuing education in general dentistry;36(4):247-264. 6. Dawood AE et al. (2015) Calcium silicate-based cements: composition, properties, and clinical applications. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry;8(2): e12195. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ jicd.12195 7. Jain AS et al. (2018). Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial activity of two biocompatible materials i.e. bio-dentine and MTA when used as a direct pulp capping agent against Streptococcus mutans and enterococcus faecalis-an in vitro study. Endodontology;30:666.https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_66_17 8. Cruz Hondares T et al. (2024) Antibacterial, biocompatible, and mineralization‐inducing properties of calcium silicate‐based cements. International journal of paediatric dentistry;34 (6):84352. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13185 9. Pushpalatha C et al. (2022) Modified Mineral Trioxide Aggregate—A Versatile Dental Material: An Insight on Applications and Newer Advancements. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology 10:941826.https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.941826 10. V, l.p. And ramar, k. (2024) 'comparative evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate vs. Bacterial cellulose nano crystal-reinforced mineral trioxide aggregate: An in vitro study', cureus [preprint]. Doi:10. 7759/ cureus.63632. 11. Mohammadi N et al. (2022). Nano-cellulose Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorations: An In Vitro study. International journal of dentistry 73:243-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.013 12. Brown AJ (1886). Dalton (Cambridge, England) 49:4329.https://doi.org/10.1039/ct8864900432 13. Yamada, y. (2014) 'transfer of gluconacetobacter kakiaceti, gluconacetobacter medellinensis and gluconacetobacter maltaceti to the genus komagataeibacter as komagataeibacter kakiaceti comb. Nov., komagataeibacter medellinensis comb. Nov. And komagataeibacter maltaceti comb. Nov..', international journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 64(pt_5), pp. 1670–1672. Doi:10. 1099/ijs.0.054494-0. 14. Klemm, d. Et al. (2011) 'nanocelluloses: A new family of nature‐based materials', angewandte chemie international edition, 50(24), pp. 5438–5466. Doi:10.1002/anie.201001273. 15. Chen, s.-q. Et al. (2018) 'mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose synthesised by diverse strains of the genus komagataeibacter', food hydrocolloids, 81, pp. 87–95. Doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.031. 16. Shi, z. Et al. (2014) 'utilization of bacterial cellulose in food', food hydrocolloids, 35, pp. 539–545. Doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.012. 17. Jinga, s.i. Et al. (2014) 'biocellulose nanowhiskers cement composites for endodontic use ', digest journal of nanomaterials and biostructures , 9(2), pp. 543–550. 18. Koutroulis, a. Et al. (2019) 'the role of calcium ion release on biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties of hydraulic cements', scientific reports, 9(1). Doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55288-3. 19. Rocha, a.c. Et al. (2015) 'physicochemical analysis of mta angelus® and biodentine® conducted with x ray difraction, dispersive energy spectrometry, x ray fluorescence, scanning electron microscope and infra red spectroscopy', revista odontológica mexicana, 19(3). Doi:10.1016/ j.rodmex.2016. 02. 023.