Meta Framework for AI-to-AI Interaction (MAI²) in Professional Contexts
Authors/Creators
- 1. 86, 16th C Main, 4th Block, Koramangala, Bangalore 560034, (Karnataka), India.
- 1. 86, 16th C Main, 4th Block, Koramangala, Bangalore 560034, (Karnataka), India.
- 2. Department of Vice-Chairperson, Education, National Institute of Design, Opposite Tagore Hall, Rajnagar Society, Paldi, Ahmedabad, (Gujarat) India.
Description
Abstract: Rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have led to autonomous agents that not only respond to humans but also interact directly with other AI agents. They are not just exchanging information but also making decisions, collaborating, and even competing as they transform several business functions. As a result, the emerging field of AI-to-AI interaction poses significant challenges around how agents collaborate and how their decisions impact business outcomes. Most existing AI agents depend on strict, rule-based communication. This approach falls short when context changes dynamically, new situations emerge, or conflicting priorities arise amongst the agents. Our research addresses these critical gaps identified through a systematic review of multi-agent systems, communication models, and interaction design. Building on the insights from our multiple-case study research on HumanAI interaction, we developed the Meta Framework for AI-to-AI Interaction (MAI²). This framework is devised around six interconnected layers that make AI-to-AI interaction reliable and trustworthy. The aspirational layer of the framework establishes the agents’ goals and values, the cognitive layer supports reasoning and real-world perception, and the strategic layer focuses on planning and execution. The governance layer ensures the system remains accountable through oversight. The synchronisation layer ensures that different agents work together smoothly. The interactional layer handles the nuts-and-bolts of communication. These layers, together, outline how AI agents collaborate, coordinate, and remain aligned with human values and expectations. MAI² is designed to enable AI agents to learn from each other, evolve together, and adapt over time to collaborate responsibly and effectively. This paper aims to advance AI-to-AI interaction by providing a structured starting point while acknowledging the limitations of its validation across diverse professional contexts.
Files
A110906011225.pdf
Files
(816.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ccb2dd1f3af6fdb8de302ed5377278f9
|
816.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.54105/ijainn.A1109.06011225
- EISSN
- 2582-7626
Dates
- Accepted
-
2025-12-15Manuscript received on 15 October 2025 | First Revised Manuscript received on 31 October 2025 | Second Revised Manuscript received on 06 December 2025 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 December 2025 | Manuscript published on 30 December 2025.
References
- Stone, P., & Veloso, M. (2000). Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective. Autonomous Robots, 8(3), 345–383. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008942012299, works remain significant, see the declaration
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson. http://lib.ysu.am/disciplines_bk/efdd4d1d4c2087fe1cbe03d9ced67f34. pdf
- McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., & Hampson, S. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) (Vol. 54). PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html
- Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H., Roff, H., Allen, G. C., Steinhardt, J., Flynn, C., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Beard, S. J., Belfield, H., Farquhar, S., Lyle, C., … Amodei, D. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.07228
- Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608
- Marri, S. (2024). 12 Conversational Archetypes for Human‑AI Interaction. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6*(3), Article 23226. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23226
- Marri, S. (2024). Conceptual Frameworks for Conversational Human-AI Interaction (CHAI) in Professional Contexts. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(10), 7842– 7853. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i10-42