To Compare and Evaluate The Efficacy and Effect on Dimensional Accuracy of the Different Disinfection Techniques on Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material When Exposed To Commonly Occurring Oral Micro Flora
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy of the different disinfection techniques on polyvinyl siloxane impression material when exposed to commonly occurring oral micro flora.
Materials And Methods: The impressions were divided into five groups (fifteen samples per group) and subjected to a spray disinfection with 2% glutaraldehyde (Group I), UV light (Group II), freshly prepared electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) with different pH values - acidic (Group III a), alkali (Group III B) and neutral (Group III C).The samples were examined pre and post-immersion under 2x magnification for surface detail reproduction, stereovision microscope for measurement of dimensional stability and surface profilometer for evaluation of surface texture. A standardized master die was fabricated and seventy-five PVS test samples were made. The samples were subjected to immersion disinfection and studied for surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and surface texture. Post hoc test and ANOVA were used to analyze dimensional stability statistically both within and between the test groups.
Results: The surface detail reproduction was satisfactory with both pre and post-immersion test samples. A statistically significant difference was observed on inter group comparison in group II and group III C whereas group III, group III B and groupI showed non significant dimensional changes. There was a negligible change in surface roughness post-immersion in Groups I, III a, III b, III c test samples with a slight increase in surface roughness post-immersion in Group I samples. All disinfectants showed statistically significant values for efficacy with highest 4log10 reduction in gluteraldehyde.
Conclusion: In this study, all the test disinfectants produced satisfactory surface detail reproduction on PVS impressions. Except UV light and electrolysed water neutral which showed statistically significant dimensional changes others disinfectants showed non significant changes on polyvinyl silixone impression material surface. All the samples showed decrease in surface roughness except the surface disinfected with gluteraldehyde which increased the surface roughness values. Statistically significant values of efficacy was observed for all five disinfecting agent i.e gluteraldehyde, UV light and electrolysed water acidic, electrolysed water basic, electrolysed water neutral. Gluteraldehyde showed highest efficacy and electrolysed water neutral showed lowest amount on comparison within these 5 disinfecting agent.
Files
YOGESH.pdf
Files
(732.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:83c5ad881e99a30e31299c75e12aeda0
|
732.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Terezhalmy GT, Gitto CA. Today's minimal requirements for a practical dental office infection control and exposure control program. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42(4):629-642 2. Samaranayke D et al. Principles of infection control. In: Essential Microbiology for Dentistry. L. P. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone pg 317-320. 3. Minagi S, Yano N, Koshida K, Tsuru H. Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. II: disinfection method for hydrophilic impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58:462-5. 4. Wakefield C.W. Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses. J. Prosthet Dent. 1980; 44:143–146. 5. Powell, G.L., Runnells, R.D., Saxon, B.A., Whisenant, B.K. The presence and identification of organisms transmitted to dental laboratories. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1990; 64: 235–237. 6. Debattista, N., Zarb, M., Portelli, J. Bacterial cross contamination between the dental clinic and laboratory during prosthetic treatment. Malta Med. J. 2010; 22:17–19 7. Denyer SP. Mechanisms of action of antibacterial biocides. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1995; 36:227–245 8. Gerhardt DE, Williams HN. Factors affecting the stability of sodium hypochlorite solutions used to disinfect dental impressions. Quintessence lnt. 1991; 22: 587-591 9. Donovan T.E., Chee W.W. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48 :(vi‑vii): 445‑70. 10. Mandikos M.N. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: An update on clinical use. Aust Dent J 1998; 43:428‑34. 11. Drennon, D., Johnson, G. and Powell, G., The accuracy and efficacy of disinfection by spray atomization on elastomeric impressions. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1989: 62(4): pg .468-475. 12. Martin N, Martin MV, Jedynakiewicz NM. The dimensional stability of dental impression materials following immersion in disinfecting solutions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(6):760-8. 13. Egusa H, Watamoto T, Matsumoto T, Abe K, Kobayashi M, Akashi Y, Yatani H. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of removing microorganisms to disinfect patient-derived dental impressions. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(6):531-8. 14. Szymańska, J. Microbiological risk factors in dentistry. Current status of knowledge. Ann agric environ med.,2005;12(2): 157-163. 15. Mehta R, Wadhwa S, Duggal N, Kumar A, Goel M, Pandey S. Influence of Repeat Pours of Addition Silicone Impressions on the Dimensional Accuracy of Casts. J Interdiscipl Med Dent Sci. 2014; 2: 108. 16. Lepe X, Johnson GH, Berg JC. Surface characteristics of polyether and addition silicone impression materials afterlong-term disinfection. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 74:181–6. 17. Mahalakshmi AS, Jeyapalan V, Mahadevan V, Krishnan CS, Azhagarasan NS, Ramakrishnan H. Comparative evaluation of the effect of electrolyzed oxidizing water on surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and surface texture of poly vinyl siloxane impressions. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019; 19:33-41. 18. Wu G, Yu X, Gu Z. Ultrasonically nebulised electrolysed oxidising water: a promising new infection control programme for impressions, metals and gypsum casts used in dental hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2008 ;68(4):348-54. 19. Nagamatsu, Y, Chen K. K, Nagamatsu H, Kozono Y, & Shimizu H. Application of neutral electrolyzed water to disinfection of alginate impression. Dental materials journal, 2016; 35(2), 270–277. 20. Jnanadev KR, Satish Babu CL, Shilpa Shetty S, Surendra Kumar GP, Sheetal HS. Disinfecting the acrylic resin plate using electrolyzed acid water and 2% glutaraldehyde: a comparative microbiological study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011;11(1):36-44. 21. Jeyapalan V, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Azhagarasan NS, Krishnan M. Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Three Immersion Chemical Disinfectants on Clinically Derived Poly(Vinyl Siloxane) Impressions. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(5):469-475.