Prosthodontic Rehabilitation with Telescopic Overdenture: An Alternative for Severely Compromised Teeth
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Background: Loss of teeth continues to be a significant challenge in geriatric and compromised dental patients. While complete dentures have long been used to restore function and esthetics in edentulous patients, their limitations in stability and bone preservation are well documented. In cases where teeth remain but are severely compromised, extractions followed by complete dentures or implant-supported prostheses are often considered. However, complete dentures accelerate alveolar resorption, while implants may be limited by systemic health, economic constraints, or inadequate bone volume. Telescopic overdentures, utilizing a system of primary and secondary copings, provide an alternative strategy that maximizes the utility of remaining teeth and improves prosthesis stability.
Objective: This article reviews the role of telescopic overdentures in prosthodontic rehabilitation for patients with severely compromised teeth, examining their biomechanical principles, clinical indications, advantages, limitations, and future prospects.
Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, focusing on telescopic overdentures, compromised dentition, and prosthodontic rehabilitation strategies. Articles published between 1990 and 2024 were considered.
Results and Discussion: Telescopic overdentures distribute occlusal loads axially, preserve residual dentition, and enhance retention compared to conventional dentures. They improve patient satisfaction by maintaining proprioception, esthetics, and stability. However, they are technique-sensitive, time-consuming, and require meticulous hygiene maintenance. Their success largely depends on accurate fabrication and patient compliance.
Conclusion: Telescopic overdentures represent a valuable alternative for patients with severely compromised teeth when implants are not feasible. Advances in digital dentistry and biomaterials are expected to further enhance their clinical applicability and long-term outcomes.
Files
ZEBA.pdf
Files
(774.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:adbeec42c8caba42be196deff61f7ec6
|
774.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Aesthetic and occlusal rehabilitation using a telescopic denture. Yee A, Chui Ling G. Cureus. 2020;12:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2. Periodontal considerations for removable prosthesis. Abrams L, Feder M. Alpha Omegan. 1962;55:123–136. [Google Scholar] 3. Telescopic overdenture and implant supported fixed partial denture: a pragmatic treatment approach. Dede DÖ, Cenk Durmuşlar M, Şahın O, Köroğlu A, İşısağ Ö. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:392397. doi: 10.1155/2015/392397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 4. Singer F, Schön F. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1966. Partial dentures: a textbook for the practitioner. [Google Scholar] 5. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:10–92. doi: 10.1016/ j.prosdent. 2005. 03. 013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 6. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. Isaacson GO. J Prosthet Dent. 1969; 22: 436–448. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(69) 90211-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 7. Telescopic overdenture: a case report. Shruthi CS, Poojya R, Ram S, Anupama Anupama. http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422644/pdf/IJBS-13-43.pdf. Int J Biomed Sci. 2017;13:43–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8. Removable partial denture production in western Germany. Owall G, Bieniek KW, Spiekermann H. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:621–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9. Telescopic overdenture for oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous patient. Verma M, Mutneja P, Gupta R, Gill S. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30:468–471. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_69_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 10. Full mouth rehabilitation using telescopic removable prosthesis. Alhammadi SH. Case Rep Dent. 2022;2022:9536443. doi: 10.1155/ 2022/ 95364 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 11. Telescope retainers and their clinical application. Langer A. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;44:516–522. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 12. Double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications. Schwindling FS, Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:488–493. doi: 10.1016/ j. prosdent.2014.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13. Telescopic denture. Hakkoum MA, Wazir G. Open Dent J. 2018;12:246–254. doi: 10.2174/ 18742106 01812010246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 14. Telescopic partial dentures-concealed technology. Bhagat TV, Walke AN. http:// www.ispcd.org/ userfiles/rishabh/V7I9/V7I9A29.pdf. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:143–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15. Prognosis of double crown-retained removable dental prostheses compared with clasp-retained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study. Ishida K, Nogawa T, Takayama Y, Saito M, Yokoyama A. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61:268–275. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpor.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16. Retention force of removable partial dentures with CAD-CAM-fabricated telescopic crowns. Arnold C, Schweyen R, Boeckler A, Hey J. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:3228. doi: 10.3390/ma13143228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17. Randomized trial investigating zirconia electroplated telescopic retainers: quality of life outcomes. Schwindling FS, Deisenhofer UK, Séché AC, Lehmann F, Rammelsberg P, Stober T. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1157–1163. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1869-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]