Published December 18, 2025
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Comparing Digital Flashcards and Contextual Instruction for L2 Vocabulary Retention
Description
This quasi-experimental study compared the effects of digital flashcards and traditional contextual instruction on the retention of L2 vocabulary. The setting was a preparatory program at a Turkish university where English is taught as a foreign language. At the beginning of the 2023-2024 academic year, the students in this institution were grouped according to their proficiency levels, and two of these groups at the A2 proficiency level were assigned as the experimental and control groups for the current study (total n=30). During the eight-week intervention, the experimental group studied 110 target words using digital flashcards on Quizlet, a web-based learning platform, and the control group studied the same target words in contextual settings through reading activities. ANCOVA calculations for the posttest and delayed posttest (4 weeks later) indicated that both groups made notable progress during the intervention, and the short-term effects of digital flashcard learning and contextual instruction were similar. However, it was clear that the long-term impacts of contextual instruction on retention were significantly better. These findings suggest that learning vocabulary through digital flashcards is as effective as contextual instruction in the short term, both in basic recognition and contextual application of the target words; however, contextual instruction is significantly more effective in the long term in both aspects.
Files
21. Ünaldı, İ. & Üstün, B. & Irgatoğlu, A. & Tanrıkulu, L. & Demirci, E. (2025). Comparing Digital.pdf
Additional details
References
- 1) Alghamdi, H. H. (2019). Exploring second language vocabulary learning in ESL classes. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p78 2) Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. 3) Ashcroft, R. J., Cvitkovic, R., & Praver, M. (2018). Digital flashcard L2 vocabulary learning outperforms traditional flashcards at lower proficiency levels: A mixed-methods study of 139 Japanese university students. The EuroCALL Review, 26(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2018.7881 4) Bahari, A., Eamer, A., & Hughes, J. (2022). An analysis of current research on computer-assisted L2 vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 39(3), 257–280. 5) Bećirović, S., Brdarević-Čeljo, A., & Delić, H. (2021). The use of digital technology in foreign language learning. SN Social Sciences, 1(10), 246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00254-y 6) Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. 7) Butler, Y. G. (2022). Teaching vocabulary to young second- or foreign-language learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 4, 4–33. 8) Chang, M., & Hung, H. (2019). Effects of technology-enhanced language learning on second language acquisition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 1–17. 9) Daly, N. (2022). Investigating learner autonomy and vocabulary learning efficiency with MALL. Language Learning and Technology, 26(1). 10) Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. 11) Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 12) Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. 13) Ghafar, Z. N., & Mohamedamin, A. A. (2022). Vocabulary acquisition techniques to learn second language English speakers: A literature review. International Journal of Middle Eastern Research, 1(1), 17–24. 14) Goldstein, E. B., & Hale, R. G. (2024). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. 15) González-Estrada, E., & Cosmes, W. (2019). Shapiro–Wilk test for skew normal distributions based on data transformations. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 89(17), 3258–3272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2019.1658763 16) Hamer, W., & Rohimajaya, N. A. (2018). Using flash card as instructional media to enrich the students' vocabulary mastery in learning English. Journal of English Language Studies, 3(2), 167–177. 17) Hilton, H. (2022). Enseigner les langues avec les apports des sciences cognitives. Hachette Éducation. 18) Hung, H.-T. (2015). Intentional vocabulary learning using digital flashcards. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 107–112. 19) Ji, P., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2021). A systematic review of vocabulary learning with mobile-assisted learning platforms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 1503–1521. 20) Khan, R. M. I. (2022). The use of flashcards in teaching EFL vocabulary in online learning. Register Journal, 15(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i1.109-125 21) Kim, M., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Lexical sophistication as a multidimensional phenomenon: Relations to second language lexical proficiency, development, and writing quality. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12447 22) Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x 23) Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1 24) Li, P., & Lan, Y.-J. (2022). Digital language learning (DLL): Insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000353 25) McLean, S., & Kramer, B. (2015). The creation of a new vocabulary levels test. Shiken, 19(2). 26) Mulder, E., Van de Ven, M., Segers, E., & Verhoven, L. (2018). Context, word, and student predictors in second language vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 137–166. 27) Nation, I. S. P. (2018). Keeping it practical and keeping it simple. Language Teaching, 51(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000349 28) Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 29) Pascual, L. C., Dionisio, G., & Ilustre, R. (2022). Vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in second language learning: A review paper. International Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), 58–62. 30) Rice, C. A., & Tokowicz, N. (2020). A review of laboratory studies of adult second language vocabulary training. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 439–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000500 31) Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921 32) Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. 33) Sousa, D. A. (2011). How the brain learns (4th ed). Corwin Press. 34) Supriatin, T., & Rizkilillah, V. P. (2018). Teaching vocabulary using flashcard. Professional Journal of English Education, 1(4), 479–484. 35) Ünaldı, İ. (2023). Flipped vocabulary instruction experience with adult language learners. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 3(3), 1014–1031. 36) Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245. 37) Wi, I., & Boers, F. (2025). A synthesis of research on L2 vocabulary learning through audiovisual input and on-screen text. Digital Applied Linguistics, 3, 102774. https://doi.org/10.29140/dal.v3.102774 38) Yudintseva, A. (2015). Game-enhanced second language vocabulary acquisition strategies: A systematic review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 03(10), 101–109. 39) Zhang, P. (2006). An overview of second language vocabulary acquisition research in China. Foreign Language and Their Teaching, 207, 21–26. 40) Zhu, T., Zhang, Y., & Irwin, D. (2024). Second and foreign language vocabulary learning through digital reading: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 4531–4563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11969-1 41) Zou, D., Huang, Y., & Xie, H. (2019). Digital game-based vocabulary learning: Where are we and where are we going? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640745