Early Orthodontic Treatment
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Early orthodontic treatment focuses on correcting developing skeletal, dentoalveolar, and muscular imbalances to create a favorable environment for normal facial growth. Initiating treatment during childhood can reduce the need for complex procedures like tooth extraction or jaw surgery in adolescence. Increased awareness among parents and professionals has led to growing interest in early intervention. While not all early treatments are effective, when properly timed and planned, they can address habits (e.g., thumb sucking), guide tooth eruption, maintain space, and correct crossbites. Early correction of functional issues can prevent them from developing into skeletal problems. However, poorly planned treatment may lead to prolonged care, higher costs, and patient fatigue. A thorough understanding of craniofacial development is essential for clinicians to deliver effective, efficient early interventions and reduce the severity of future orthodontic needs. Systematically planned interceptive treatment in the mixed dentition might contribute to a significant reduction in treatment need between the ages of 8 and 12 years. But in some instances early intervention does not change appreciably the environment for dentofacial development and permanent tooth eruption. In such instances, early treatment may serve only to increase time and cost and may result in patient burnout. So every effort must be made to time the treatment appropriately so as to maximize the treatment benefit in the shortest period of time.
Files
SHUCHI.pdf
Files
(683.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a2454641d8b4cce01c4adc5c473ee2d4
|
683.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Moyers, R.E., 1988. Handbook of Orthodontics. 4th ed. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., pp. 343–348. 2. McNamara, J.A. Jr. and Brudon, W.L., 1993. Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition. Needham Press, pp. 95–117. 3. Carlson, D.S., 2002. Biological rationale for early treatment of dentofacial deformities. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 121(6), pp. 554–558. 4. Subtelny, J.D., 2000. Early Orthodontic Treatment. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 3–40. 5. Tulloch, J.F., 1997. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 111(4), pp. 391–400. 6. Ghafari, J., Shofer, F.S., Hunt, J.U., Markowitz, D.L. and Laster, L.L., 1998. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113(1), pp. 51–61. 7. Tulloch, J.F.C., Phillips, C. and Proffit, W.F., 1998. Benefits of early Class II treatment – Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113(1), pp. 62–72. 8. Lund, D.I. and Sandler, P.J., 1998. The effects of Twin Block Appliance: A prospective controlled study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113(1), pp. 104–110. 9. Illing, H.M., Morris, D.O. and Lee, R.T., 1998. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I – the hard tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics, 20(5), pp. 501–516. 10. Sergl, H.G. and Zentner, A., 1998. A comparative assessment of acceptance of different types of functional appliances. European Journal of Orthodontics, 20(5), pp. 517–524. 11. Morris, D.O., Illing, H.M. and Lee, R.T., 1998. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II – the soft tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics, 20(6), pp. 663–684. 12. Ruf, S. and Pancherz, H., 1999. TMJ remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal MRI and cephalometric radiographic investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 115(6), pp. 607–618. 13. Ruf, S. and Pancherz, H., 2000. Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients. Angle Orthodontist, 70(3), pp. 183–199. 14. Voudouris, J.C. and Kuftinec, M.M., 2000. Improved clinical use of Twin-Block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long term retention: Growth relativity. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 117(3), pp. 247–266. 15. Klocke, A., Nanda, R.S. and Ghosh, J., 2000. Muscle activity with the mandibular lip bumper. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 117(4), pp. 384–390. 16. Hiyama, S., Ono, T., Ishiwata, Y., Kuroda, T. and McNamara, J.A., 2000. Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations following mandibular forward positioning induced by the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthodontist, 70(6), pp. 442–453. 17. Leung, D.K. and Hägg, U., 2001. An electromyographic investigation of the first six months of progressive mandibular advancement of the Herbst appliance in adolescents. Angle Orthodontist, 71(3), pp. 177–184. 18. Rabie, A.B.M., Zhao, Z., Shen, G., Hägg, U. and Robinson, W., 2001. Osteogenesis in the glenoid fossa in response to mandibular advancement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 119(4), pp. 390–400. 19. Rabie, A.B.M., Leung, F.Y.C., Chayanupatkul, A. and Hägg, U., 2002. The correlation between neovascularization and bone formation in the condyle during forward mandibular positioning. Angle Orthodontist, 72(5), pp. 431–438. 20. Pancherz, H., 2002. Treatment timing and outcome. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 121(6), p. 559. 21. Rabie, A.B.M., She, T.T. and Hägg, U., 2003. Functional appliance therapy accelerates and enhances condylar growth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123(1), pp. 40–48. 22. Kulbersh, V.P., Berger, J.L., Chermak, D.S., Kaczynski, R., Simon, E.S. and Haerian, A., 2003. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123(3), pp.286-295. 23. Cevidanes, L.H.S., Franco, A.A., Scanavini, M.A., Vigorito, J.W., Enlow, D.H. and Proffit, W.R., 2003. Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123(4), pp.379-387. 24. Voudouris, J.C., Woodside, D.G., Altuna, G., Kuftinec, M.M., Angelopoulos, G. and Bourque, P.J., 2003. Condyle-Fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst Treatment, Part 1. New technological methods. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 123(6), pp.604-613. 25. Voudouris, J.C., Woodside, D.G., Altuna, G., Angelopoulos, G., Bourque, P.J., Lacouture, C.Y. and Kuftinec, M.M., 2003. Condyle-Fossa modification and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 2. Results and Conclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 124(1), pp.13-29. 26. Faltin, K., Faltin, R., Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., Ghiozzi, B. and McNamara, J.A., 2003. Long term effects and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthodontist, 73(3), pp.221-230. 27. Pancherz, H. and Fischer, S., 2003. Amount and direction of TMJ growth changes in Herbst treatment: A cephalometric long term investigation. Angle Orthodontist, 73, pp.493-501. 28. Du, X. and Hägg, U., 2003. Muscular adaptation to gradual advancement of the mandible. Angle Orthodontist, 73, pp.525-531. 29. O'Brien, K., Wright, J., Conboy, F., Sanjre, Y.W., Mandall, N. and Chadwick, S., 2003. Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin Block Appliance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 124(2), pp.128-137. 30. Rabie, A.B.M., Tsai, M.J.M., Hägg, U., Du, X. and Chou, B.W., 2003. Correlation of replicating cells and osteogenesis in the condyle during stepwise advancement. Angle Orthodontist, 73, pp.457-465. 31. Tulloch, J.F.C., Proffit, W.R. and Phillips, C., 2004. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 125(6), pp.657-667. 32. Schaefer, A.T., McNamara, J.A., Franchi, L. and Baccetti, T., 2004. A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 126(1), pp.7-15. 33. Negan, P.W., Hagg, U., Yiu, C. and Wei, S.H.Y., 1997. Treatment Response and Long-Term Dentofacial Adaptations to Maxillary Expansion and Protraction. Seminars in Orthodontics, 3, pp.255-264. 34. Deguchi, T. and McNamara, J.A., 1999. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chin cup therapy in Class III patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 115(2), pp.175-182. 35. Franchi, L., Baccetti, T. and McNamara, J.A., 2004. Post pubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 126(11), pp.555-568. 36. Cozza, P., Marino, A. and Mucedero, M.N., 2004. An orthodontic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition. European Journal of Orthodontics, 26, pp.191-199. 37. Iida, Y., Deguchi, T. Sr and Kageyama, T., 2005. Chin Cup Treatment Outcomes in Skeletal Class III Dolicho- Versus Nondolichofacial Patients. Angle Orthodontist, 75, pp.502-509. 38. McNamara, J.A., 2002. Early intervention in the transverse Dimension. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 121(6), pp.572-574. 39. Proffit, W.R. and Fields, H.W., 2007. Orthodontic treatment planning: limitations, controversies and special problems. In Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, pp.284. 40. Little, R.M., 2002. Stability and relapse: Early treatment of arch Length deficiency. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 121(6), pp.578-581. 41. Little, R., 1999. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment. Seminars in Orthodontics, 5, pp.191-204. 42. Sinclair, P. and Little, R., 1983. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. American Journal of Orthodontics, 83(2), pp.114-123. 43. Little, R. and Riedel, R., 1989. Post retention evaluation of stability and relapse: mandibular arches with generalized spacing. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 95(1), pp.37-41. 44. Little, R., Riedel, R. and Stein, A., 1990. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: post retention evaluation of stability and relapse. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 97(5), pp.393-404. 45. Little, R., Riedel, R. and Artun, J., 1988. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post retention. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 93(6), pp.423–428. 46. Nance, H., 1947. The limitations of orthodontic treatment. I. Mixed dentition diagnosis and treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery, 33, pp.177–223. 47. Dugoni, S., Lee, J., Varela, J. and Dugoni, A., 1995. Early mixed dentition treatment: post retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthodontist, 65, pp.311–320. 48. McNamara, J.A., Brudon, W.L. and Kokich, V.G., 1999. Textbook of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Needham Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 49. Mitanni, H., 2002. Early application of chincap therapy to skeletal Class III malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 121(6), pp.584–585. 50. Subtelny, J.D., 2000. Early Orthodontic treatment. In: Early Orthodontic Treatment. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., pp.161–174. 51. Kokich, V.G. and Crabill, K.E., 2006. Managing the patient with missing or malformed maxillary central incisors. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 129(4), pp.S55–S64. 52. Kluemper, G.T., Beeman, C.S. and Hicks, P., 2000. Early Orthodontic Treatment: What are the Imperatives? Journal of the American Dental Association, 131(5), pp.613–620. 53. Keeling, S.D., Wheeler, T.T., King, G.J., et al., 1998. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionator and headgear. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113(1), pp.40–50. 54. Proffit, W.R. and Fields, H.W., 2000. Orthodontic treatment planning: limitations, controversies and special problems. In: Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, pp.271. 55. Proffit, W.R. and Fields, H.W., 2000. Skeletal problems. In: Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, pp.257, 508–515. 56. Johnston, L.E. Jr., 1996. Functional appliances: a mortgage on mandibular position. Australian Orthodontic Journal, 14(3), pp.154–157. 57. Turpin, D.L., 2007. The long-awaited Cochrane review of 2-phase treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 132(4), pp.423–424. 58. Nguyen, Q.V., Bezemer, P.D., Habets, L. and Prahl-Andersen, B., 1999. A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries. European Journal of Orthodontics, 21 (5), pp.503–515