Published November 12, 2025 | Version v1

Capoeta

Description

Capoeta, a genus of hybrid origin?

It has long been suspected that the relationship of Capoeta is with the Oriental algae scrapers of the genera Onychostoma, Semiplotus, and Scaphiodonichthys. Since, mitochondrial molecular markers have demonstrated that Capoeta is closely related to the genera Aulopyge, Barbus and Luciobarbus. All mitochondrial phylogenetic analyses indicate that Capoeta is nested within Luciobarbus. As is the case with the majority of Palearctic barbels, all Luciobarbus studied are tetraploid, with 100 chromosomes. Conversely, all Capoeta studied are hexaploid, with 150 chromosomes. The shift from tetraploidy to hexaploidy is a pivotal event in the evolution of Capoeta. Polyploidisation in fish is often associated with hybridisation, and it can be postulated that this was also the case in the origin of Capoeta. If a tetraploid mother (chromosomes in the egg: n = 2) and a diploid father (chromosome in the sperm cell: n = 1) (or vice versa) hybridise, the offspring is triploid (n = 3) and is likely to be sterile. It can be postulated that triploids cannot produce viable gametes.

It is plausible that these hybrids were sufficiently abundant in a certain situation to mate with each other and were occasionally able to produce mitotic gametes, i.e., gametes without meiotic division. These eggs and sperm should have been triploid (n = 3), and after fertilisation, a new fish with an even number of chromosomes, here six, would result. This hexaploid fish could then spawn normally with the other hexaploid hybrids, which might have constituted the initial step of the new lineage, the genus Capoeta. Support for this hybridisation event is further strengthened by nuclear DNA evidence from the RAG1 gene which, together with mitochondrial markers, suggests a biparental genomic contribution. While the mitochondrial data confirm Luciobarbus as the maternal source, the RAG1 tree indicates a mixed ancestry, consistent with an ancient Cyprinion-like paternal lineage, and reinforces the role of polyploidisation in the evolution of Capoeta. These hybridisation and polyploidisation events may have enabled the hybrids to occupy a different ecological niche than their parents, resulting in the evolution of reproductive isolation from their parents.

Further reading. Yang et al. 2015 (hybrid origin).

Notes

Published as part of Freyhof, Jörg, Yoğurtçuoğlu, Baran, Jouladeh-Roudbar, Arash & Kaya, Cüneyt, 2025, Handbook of Freshwater Fishes of West Asia, GmbH, Berlin / Boston :De Gruyter on pages 121-122, DOI: 10.1515/9783111677811, http://zenodo.org/record/17881367

Files

Files (2.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:64de7b7fafc3673bd11dc4ec0063bd18
2.8 kB Download

System files (10.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bd74fb536c1848d7a032305ddba9658f
10.8 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Cypriniformes
Family
Cyprinidae
Genus
Capoeta
Taxon rank
genus

References

  • Yang, L., T. Sado, M. Vincent Hirt, E. Pasco-Viel, M. Arunachalam, J. Li, X. Wang, J. Freyhof, K. Saito, A M. Simons, M. Miya, S. He & R. L. Mayden. 2015. Phylogeny and polyploidy: Resolving the classification of cyprinine fishes (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 85: 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.01.014