Published August 30, 2025 | Version v1

From Scan to Surgery: A Review of Computer-Assisted Imaging in Dental Implant Planning

  • 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)

Description

Abstract

Computer-assisted imaging has become integral to modern implant dentistry, enhancing precision, safety, and predictability in surgical outcomes. Central to this digital workflow are Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files, which provide complementary datasets for comprehensive treatment planning. CBCT offers detailed three-dimensional visualization of hard tissues, enabling accurate assessment of bone volume, anatomical landmarks, and proximity to vital structures. STL files, derived from intraoral or desktop scanners, represent the surface morphology of teeth and soft tissues with high resolution. In static navigation systems, these datasets are merged to design and fabricate surgical guides using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. These guides facilitate precise osteotomy preparation and implant placement based on a pre-defined virtual plan. On the other hand, dynamic navigation systems utilize real-time tracking technologies, integrating CBCT-derived anatomical data with STL surface scans to allow intraoperative adjustments and visual guidance without the need for a physical guide.  The integration of CBCT and STL data thus bridges diagnostic accuracy with operational precision, enabling minimally invasive procedures and improving both aesthetic and functional outcomes. As the field continues to evolve with innovations such as artificial intelligence and robotics, mastering the use of these digital tools is essential for clinicians seeking to deliver evidence-based, patient-centered care.

Files

SURYAKANTH.pdf

Files (744.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f1e5902cc7bf7e7bf831f6f53f492cdd
744.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60:72 -84. 2. Rubio NA. Computer-assisted imaging for virtual implant planning. Clinical Dentistry Reviewed 2022:19:6:4. 3. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC oral health 2017: 12:17:149. 4. Revilla-León M, Jiang P, Sadeghpour M, et al. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124:575-80. 5. Kaya G, Bilmenoglu C. Accuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2022; 14:388-98. 6. Harris D, Horner K, Grondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, Bornstein MM, Dawood A, Quirynen M. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:1243-53. 7. Bornstein M, Scarfe W, Vaugh V, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 55-77. 8. Horner K, O'Malley L, Taylor K, Glenny AM. Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44:20140225. 9. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, Van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2007; 22: 446-54. 10. Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140224. 11. Januário AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 366-73. 12. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hilde bolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113: 817-29. 13. Gulati M, Anand V, Salaria SK, Jain N, Gupta S. Computerized implant-dentistry: Advances toward automation. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015; 19:5-10.