A Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes Around Two Piece Delayed Loaded Implant in One Stage versus Two Stage Implant Surgery Procedure: A Clinico-Radiographic in Vivo Study
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Statement of problem: Various studies have been conducted to compare the soft-tissue changes between one-stage and two-stage implant surgery procedure but the relation of soft tissue and aesthetics with the type of surgical procedure is yet to be studied.
Purpose of study: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the soft-tissue changes around one-stage versus two-stage implants both radiographically and clinically to assess the success of implants.
Material and methods: Twenty edentulous sites for implant placement were selected from patients in the age range of 18- 51 years. They were randomly assigned to two equally sized groups respectively for one-stage and two-stage implant surgery procedure. After placement of implants, all the sites were evaluated for soft-tissue outcome using standardized indices. Patient satisfaction was analyzed using visual analog scale (VAS) and aesthetic outcome was observed by 3 blind observers. All the follow ups were done after implant placement (T0), at 3 months (T1) and 6 months after loading (T2). Any changes in soft tissue dimensions were also assessed on CBCT with the help of a prepared stent.
Results: The collected experimental datasets were compared between one-stage and two-stage implant surgical procedures. Inter-group comparisons of One-stage Vs Two-stage implant surgical procedure among the variables showed a non-significant result. Patient Compliance scores and Aesthetic outcome by blind observers also showed non-significant differences.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that there were no significant differences with respect to soft-tissue outcome, patient compliance and aesthetic outcome
Files
SOUMIK.pdf
Files
(1.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a30a9d980d6ef0c86c5b6054164383ca
|
1.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Gheisari R, Eatemadi H, Alavian A. Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18:272-276. 2. Levine RA. Soft tissue considerations for optimizing implant esthetics. Funct Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;1:54-62. 3. Rajpal J, Gupta KK, Tandon P, Srivastava A, Chandra C. Assessment of hard and soft tissue changes around implants: A clinico-radiographic in vivo study. Journal of Dental Implants. 2014;4:126. 4. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Chew YS, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1‐versus 2‐stage implant placement. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009;3. 5. Geurs NC, Vassilopoulos PJ, Reddy MS. Soft tissue considerations in implant site development. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics. 2010;22:387-405. 6. Mombelli A, Van Oosten MAC, Schürch E, Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2:145–151. 7. Talreja PS, Gayathri GV, Mehta DS. Treatment of an early failing implant by guided bone regeneration using resorbable collagen membrane and bioactive glass. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2013;17:131. 8. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1997;17. 9. Lindeboom JAH, Tjiook Y, Kroon FHM. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: A prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:705-10. 10. Brescovitt RA, Thomé G, Melo AC, Silva RD. Soft tissue behavior around dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and immediately restored in esthetic area: A preliminary short-term evaluation. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. 2017;46:196-202. 11. Dong H, Zhou N, Liu H, Huang H, Yang G, Chen L, Ding M, Mou Y. Satisfaction analysis of patients with single implant treatments based on a questionnaire survey. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019;13:695–704. 12. Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: The pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:639–44. 13. Fuentealba R, Jofré J. Esthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dental Clinics. 2015;59:227-46. 14. Bhoosreddy AR, Bhoosreddy S, Shirsekar VU. Implant imaging. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;3:127–32. 15. Altay MA, Sindel A, Tezerişener HA, Yıldırımyan N, Özarslan MM. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes. International journal of implant dentistry. 2019;5:1-8. 16. DeAngelo SJ, Kumar PS, Beck FM, Tatakis DN, Leblebicioglu B. Early soft tissue healing around one‐stage dental implants: Clinical and microbiologic parameters. Journal of periodontology. 2007;78:1878-86. 17. Chaushu L, Naishlos S, Rosner O, Zenziper E, Glikman A, Lavi D, et al. Changing preference of one-vs. two-stage implant placement in partially edentulous individuals: An 18-year retrospective study. Applied Sciences. 2020;10:7060. 18. Gülay G, Asar NV, Tulunoglu I, Turkyilmaz I, Wang HL, Tözüm TF. Primary stability/mobility of 1-stage and 2-stage dental implants: A comparative in vitro study. Implant Dentistry. 2012;21:461-6. 19. Chang M, Wennstrom JL, Odman P, Andersson B. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth: Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999: 10: 185-94. 20. van Kesteren CJ, Schoolfield J, West J, Oates T. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:562-70. 21. Torkzaban P, Arabi SR, Roshanaei G, Rostami M, Soheilifar S. A comparative study of clinical parameters in submerged and non submerged implants. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2015;9:ZC26. 22. Alfaer AS, Alharbi NY, Alsulami AA, Alharthi SM, Modahi FH, Modahi NH, et al. A comparative review one-stage and two-stage dental implants. Int J Community Med Public Health 2023;10: 3387-91. 23. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged vs. non‐submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20:1307-13.