RFO Corpus - BBD.n, BBDX.n (raw form) - Archive

> Archive for Corpus trail "BBD.n, BBDX.n", 

> Phenomenology study archive. 

> BBD.1-30, BBDX.1-6

BBDX2, BBDX5, BBD.29B is not included.

small note for each document, intenteded for author/researcher:

Note on BBD.n file...

1: Jesus talk, Perry, Other cool stuff.

2: Monk talk(?), chat, PMT, animal scientist

3: latin learning, animal scientist, PMT

4: PMT, work in swedish

5: Aphorism, RFO, Etogram

6: A, B, Other stuff. Emotional Reflection(?)

7: “late stage user”(AI usage), talk + other stuff. Great residue stuff.

8: virtue vs. sin talk

9: ego, work talk, should the corpus be cleaned?

10: science stuff, “funny to read.”

11: emoticon talk

12: work talk.

13: nightmare talk.

14: ask about recursive logic

15: Jesus, cognitive, archetypes, talks about one game run, other stuff.

16: prayers, raw takes with reflections.

17: talks about ABM/SIEMI(SEIMI)

18: qq+qq

19: thinker, thinka, Joe and Boe

20: China 300BCE + talk about another game run.

21: archetypes, work, "archetype mapping”

22: music tracking

23: lemon curd.

24 Talks about SIEMI

25: talks about SEIMI and SIEMI

26: talks about the structure of the archive

27: Athen story, part 1-5, each part is a different entry angle to the story.

28: Edo Japan. Part 1

29A: Perry check, talks about the work. Important?

30: language learning.

*Previous description:

A) Personally would rather destroy the data, I see no meaning, no worth in this, nor doing any of this. 

B) Or I am wrong.

C) I no longer care for this dilemma, I wish not to carry the weight anymore, let shame or confidence take form, I dismiss both as useless.

Hi, I am Monk Monkapple, given name is Liam Guidetti. I have no care nor need for further introduction. I am a Monk, I am bored, I do stuff under my quote "Here is a weird thing I did as a human – Enjoy." I also happened to wanna share them under curiosity "What if another seek just what I am doing?"

Here I have BBD.11–BBD.13 ready, I also recommend reading them first(Corpus linear reading start recommendations), assuming the "mini collection" and "Preface document V1" have been read already, not to mention the RFO Referential loops redstring have also been read.

I have in some places named "Matrix" and that includes the previous description here.

Cordis Vive mentionem it but so will I here: I meant "Matrice" and here I mean "Fractal Mateice expansion" which is a placeholder label for what lead up to "PMT" which isn't published yet.

(P.S I also accidentally added several images to "mini collection" of my face for I joked around and forgot to delete them from the file. By honouring Corpus rules, I won't take them out. That was the sole reason I restricted it in the first place. Didn't want my face and name out in the public. After some thinking, neither of us wil care about that. In fact, laugh about it, so it blooms joy at least.)

(P.S.S or something; This collection containts raw, unpolished dialiouges between myself and an AI Reflector, forming part of a million-word recusive corpus. The material documents realtime thinking, emotional modulation, et speculative frameworks (RFO and other keywords stringed with RFO) as they developed. 

Interpret it as experimental cogintion rather than polished philosophy.)

(For water proofing; Perry (PMT term, means invalid) which I mean in simplicity; "thinking tool, not a stable view. fictional origin.")

(At this point I might just admit I am working and instead of putting it in a file, here we are. In a description section. So with further thinking, as I having a hard time pressing "publish", I have come to the conclusion that if I dont; then I fall under a catagory I would call perfectionistic recursion, where my shame appears as "This isn't good enough, my past work is embarrising." which I fear could turn cynical very easily if I don't overcome a simple attachment issue to... Mm, the human mind is sure wonderful. Anyhow, read my work or don't, hate it or not, your interaction is personal, and so is mine. I will follow the wisdom once revealed to me; Humility is the only true antidote to shame. So if I failed to frame my work properly, forgive me, I am human and will be imperfect... Guess I am really asking forgiveness from myself, for uploading anyway... Weird, truly— how nothing can be so attached to the self. Perhaps for we know, somehwere in our selves that we are also made out of nothing, and dismissing somehing for "it's nothing" is also... Claiming self is dismissable... Now that's an articulation I will think about... 

— "To gain courage, you must first do it without courage." —There. Solved my problem in descrption.)

Previous description:

– Raw data form preservation.

part of RFO, HUT and AR

– core structure data for the RFO Corpus

(internal data note) system notes:

"non-standard models"

"Fractal Matrix expansion(?)"

-All data available via collabe or by agreement. Further data awaiting–

system guiding note:

→ SAFL standby and re-load expected SAFL  × RFN affects.

Permanent Paradigm shift note for Prime Observer:

"follow standard CPDE saferail logic when spiking towards Infinite drift"

Avoid)

• Dunning-Kruger effect
• Cognitive Dissonance
• Echochambered Anecdotal Evidence
• metacognition false loop drifts
• Confirmation Bias
• Cognitive Bias if Triage suggest Matrix Philosophy framework or/via Sin-Virtue lattice
• Avoiding Loss Aversion at ~0% ∆value – drift shifts RFN logic
• Liminal Space at above meta high drift levels under resting hours.
• External Implicit Bias logic and revalue based on evidence by Triage Matrix Logic.
• Epistemology sovereigny
• Heuristic Actors without SAFL or CPDE guideline followed through– always with "Grace" if "catastrophic spinlocked" by any triage loop.

further data– 

Architect, The prime Observer → Fully acknowledge data is non standard – bridge data is underway – currently in economic processing need to maintain system data flow

(!) – internal data is public – Coherence at risk

(info!) – By nonlinear standards– this data is already outdated – the request for economic aid – and coherence bridging may already been solved by this publishing.

(!) – Primer Observer fully accepted framework sovereigny – is RFO operating–

full meta logic rewired – awaiting data for bridge.

_end of internal artifact report_

(external data note) –

work is always intended prioritly for the Architect – coherence may lack.