Published May 31, 2023 | Version v1

Architectural Patterns for High-Performance Data Warehousing in the Cloud

Authors/Creators

Description

Cloud based data warehousing has emerged as a foundational pillar for modern analytics platforms as organizations increasingly rely on elastic, scalable, and globally distributed infrastructure to support large scale data processing. Despite substantial progress in commercial cloud data warehouse systems, achieving consistently high performance remains challenging due to heterogeneous workloads, dynamic resource requirements, semi structured data growth, and stringent latency expectations. This paper systematically examines architectural patterns that enable high performance data warehousing in cloud environments. I analyze key design approaches, including separation of compute and storage, massively parallel processing (MPP), hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) extensions, data lakehouse convergence, multi-tier cache acceleration, and microservices driven ingestion pipelines. I further evaluate workload isolation techniques, autoscaling strategies, and cost performance optimization mechanisms across leading cloud platforms. Comparative analysis and real-world implementation examples demonstrate how these architectural patterns influence throughput, query latency, and operational efficiency. This paper highlights emerging advancements such as serverless data warehousing, adaptive query optimization, vectorized execution engines, and AI-enabled workload orchestration. The findings offer actionable guidance for architects and engineers designing next generation analytical systems, and identify future research directions to advance performance aware cloud data warehousing at scale.

Files

EJAET-10-5-132-137.pdf

Files (419.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cc094602bf757844339e7ec0111ec086
419.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1]. A. Abadi et al., "Big data analytics: Opportunities and challenges," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 252–272, Feb. 2021.
  • [2]. M. Stonebraker and P. Brown, "The case for shared-nothing," IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Mar. 2018.
  • [3]. M. Stonebraker, D. Abadi, K. Birman et al., "The end of an architectural era (it's time for a complete rewrite)," Proc. VLDB, pp. 1150–1160, 2007.
  • [4]. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, "MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters," Communications of the ACM, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 107–113, Jan. 2008.
  • [5]. M. Armbrust et al., "Delta Lake: High-performance ACID table storage over cloud object stores," Proc. VLDB, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3411–3424, Aug. 2020.
  • [6]. S. Melnik et al., "Dremel: Interactive analysis of web-scale datasets," Proc. VLDB, pp. 330–339, 2010.
  • [7]. D. J. Abadi, "Query execution in column-oriented database systems," Proc. VLDB, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2408–2419, 2012.
  • [8]. M. Zaharia et al., "Resilient distributed datasets: A fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing," Proc. NSDI, pp. 15–28, 2012.
  • [9]. L. Wang et al., "A survey of serverless computing," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 48–57, Jan. 2021.
  • [10]. B. Dageville et al., "The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse," Proc. SIGMOD, pp. 215–226, 2016.
  • [11]. M. Armbrust et al., "Spark SQL: Relational Data Processing in Spark," Proc. SIGMOD, pp. 1383–1394, 2015.
  • [12]. M. J. Franklin et al., "Presto: SQL on Everything," Proc. IEEE Big Data, pp. 1802–1811, 2019.
  • [13]. M. Armbrust et al., "Delta Lake: High-Performance ACID Table Storage over Cloud Object Stores," Proc. VLDB, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3411–3424, 2020.
  • [14]. S. Melnik et al., "Dremel: Interactive analysis of web-scale datasets," Proc. VLDB, pp. 330–339, 2010.
  • [15]. Amazon Web Services, Amazon Redshift Spectrum: Extending data warehousing to your data lake, AWS Technical Whitepaper, 2017.
  • [16]. Snowflake Inc., Snowflake Architecture Guide, Technical Whitepaper, 2020.
  • [17]. Microsoft, Azure Synapse Analytics: Technical Overview, Microsoft Whitepaper, 2020.
  • [18]. J. Duggan et al., "The BigDAWG Polystore System," SIGMOD Record, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 11–16, 2015.
  • [19]. S. Harizopoulos, D. Abadi, S. Madden, and M. Stonebraker, "OLTP through the looking glass, and what we found there," Proc. SIGMOD, pp. 981–992, 2008.
  • [20]. A. Pavlo et al., "Self-Driving Database Management Systems," CIDR, pp. 1–13, 2017.
  • [21]. H. Ballani et al., "Towards predictable datacenter networks," Proc. SIGCOMM, pp. 242–253, 2011.
  • [22]. E. Jonas et al., "Cloud programming simplified: A Berkeley view on serverless computing," Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 54-62, 2020.
  • [23]. T. Kraska et al., "The case for learned index structures," Proc. SIGMOD, pp. 489-504, 2018.
  • [24]. R. Xin et al., "Apache Iceberg: High-performance table format for large analytic datasets," Proc. VLDB, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3083-3096, 2022.