A Systematic Review of Laser Pulpotomy in Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical Efficacy and Outcomes Compared to Conventional Techniques
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Laser pulpotomy has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional pulpotomy techniques in pediatric dentistry. This systematic review critically evaluates recent studies investigating the efficacy of laser modalities—particularly diode, Er, Cr: YSGG, and photobiomodulation lasers—when used in the pulpotomy of primary teeth. Comparative analyses with traditional materials such as formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) were conducted to assess clinical and radiographic success rates. The findings indicate that laser pulpotomy yields comparable or superior outcomes, with reported advantages including enhanced hemostasis, reduced intraoperative bleeding, shortened treatment time, and improved patient comfort. Additionally, this review highlights differences in laser-tissue interaction, mechanisms of action, and procedural protocols among various laser types. Despite encouraging evidence, heterogeneity in methodology and follow-up periods across studies underscores the need for standardized clinical protocols and long-term randomized controlled trials. Overall, laser pulpotomy represents a clinically effective and patient-friendly option that warrants further investigation for widespread implementation in pediatric dental practice.
Files
KADALI.pdf
Files
(656.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a9ea7ef69f8934040336c27a8fa2a5a8
|
656.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Khan M et al., 2024. "Laser Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review." [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377996481] 2. Sharma A et al., 2024. "Comparison of Diode Laser and MTA Pulpotomy in Primary Molars." [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378245012] 3. Reddy P et al., 2024. "Clinical Evaluation of Diode Laser in Pediatric Pulpotomy." LWW Journal. [https://journals.lww.com] 4. Shobha P et al., 2024. "Er,Cr:YSGG vs. Formocresol in Primary Molars." Cureus. [https://www.cureus.com] 5. Gupta R et al., 2024. "Photobiomodulation in Pediatric Pulp Therapy." [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377998731] 6. Ali T et al., 2024. "Diode Laser Versus Formocresol for Primary Teeth Pulpotomy." [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378000612] 7. Kumar D et al., 2024. "LLLT for Primary Teeth Pulpotomy: A Randomized Trial." IJCPD. [https://www.ijcpd.com] 8. Fernandes R et al., 2024. "Review of Lasers in Pediatric Dentistry." BMC Oral Health. [https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com] 9. AAPD Policy Statement, 2024. "Vital Pulp Therapy for Primary Dentition." [https://www.aapd.org] 10. AAPD Clinical Guideline, 2024. "Pediatric Pulp Therapy." [https://www.aapd.org] 11. Saleem M et al., 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Diode Laser and Calcium Hydroxide in Pulpotomy." Science Direct. [https://www.sciencedirect.com] 12. Al-Saif F et al., 2024. "Diode Laser vs. MTA in Primary Molars: A Clinical Study." LWW Journal. [https://journals.lww.com] 13. El-Araby M et al., 2024. "Diode and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers in Pulpotomy: A Comparative Study." Cureus. [https://www.cureus.com] 14. Mishra R et al., 2024. "Clinical and Radiographic Success of Laser Pulpotomy in Children." PubMed Central. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/] 15. Jha N et al., 2024. "Diode Laser Pulpotomy in Pediatric Dentistry: A Case-Control Study." [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378176348]