An in-Vitro Study Comparing The Shear Bond Strength of Four Commercially Available Bonding Materials
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Bonding adhesives are orthodontically crucial to establish stability and counter masticatory forces during the treatment period. In this research, the shear bond strength (SBS) of four light-cured orthodontal bonding agents—Transbond XT, D-Tech Light Cure, Vericom U Composite, and Orthofix Light Cure—was evaluated under in vitro test conditions with primer application. Eighty non-carious fresh maxillary premolars were divided into four groups (n = 20), embedded in plaster blocks, and bonded with metal brackets. All bond failure of SBS was evaluated with an Instron Universal Testing Machine under force application. ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) between adhesives. Transbond XT demonstrates the highest shear bond strength of 1063.05 MPa, which suggests that, although the bond is strong enough, it could also cause enamel damage. D-tech light cure is least apt to be used for applications requiring high bond strength with a shear strength of bond 225.53 MPa. Vericom U Composite (367.41 MPa) and Orthofix Light Cure (585.43 MPa) were shown to possess an intermediate value of shear bond strength between adhesive strength and enamel safety .Results call for the type of adhesive that should be drawn up according to clinical requirements because high-shear bond strength adhesives provide increased stability but higher risk for the damage of enamel, while the moderate shear bond strengths will ensure safer debonding. Future studies will need to be conducted on the long-term durability of SBS and the effect of debonding forces on enamel integrity.
Files
PAVITHRA.pdf
Files
(863.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d36c46c0176687bbae6d775e74268909
|
863.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Buonocore MG. A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces. Journal of Dental Research. 1955 Dec;34(6):849–53 https:// doi.org/ 10.1177/ 00220 345550340060801. 2. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8. 3. Newman GV. Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachments. Am J Orthod. 1969;56(6):573–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90193-6. 4. Zhu JJ, Tang AT, Matinlinna JP, Hägg U. Acid etching of human enamel in clinical applications: a systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2014 Aug 1;112(2):122-35.https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.024 5. Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:350–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80328-2. 6. Thadathil Varghese, J., Raju, R., Farrar, P., Prentice, L. and Prusty, B. (2024), Comparative analysis of self-cure and dual cure-dental composites on their physico-mechanical behaviour. Aust Dent J, 69: 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.13004 7. Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Hosier MJ. Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:302–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70025-0. 8. Mohammed OK, Younis MT, Dawood AE. The effect of light curing time and intensity on the bond strength and fracture resistance of orthodontic adhesive. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2023;17:23–7. https://doi.org/ 10.34172/ joddd. 2023.36990. 9. Eser I, Cicek O, Ozkalayci N, Yetmez M, Erener H. Effect of different types of adhesive agents on orthodontic bracket shear bond strength: A cyclic loading study. Materials (Basel) 2023;16:724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020724. 10. Youssefinia S, Mortezai O. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic color change adhesive with traditional adhesive. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:690–2. https://doi.org/ 10.4103/ ijdr. IJDR_ 780_16. 11. Paolone, G., Mandurino, M., Baldani, S., Paolone, M. G., Goracci, C., Scolavino, S., Gherlone, E., Cantatore, G., & Gastaldi, G. (2023). Quantitative Volumetric Enamel Loss after Orthodontic Debracketing/Debonding and Clean-Up Procedures: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5369. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095369 12. Kiryk S, Kiryk J, Matys J, Dobrzyński M. The Influence of Resin Infiltration on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(1):32. Published 2025 Jan 17. doi:10.3390/ jfb16010032 13. Prasad RR, Rai S, Jain AK, Sahu A, Lall R, Thakur S. A comparative study of shear bond strength of four different light cure orthodontic adhesives: An in vitro study. Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics 2022;6:94–9.https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2022.018. 14. Mittal N, Mangla R, Bhatnagar D, Bhullar MK, Ahuja G, Devi A. Evaluation of in vivo efficacy and in vitro shear bond strength of fluoride-releasing orthodontic composite and fluoride varnish. Cureus 2025;17:e77823. https://doi.org/ 10.7759/ cureus. 77823. 15. Woś P, Kiryk S, Dyl T, Kiryk J, Horodniczy T, Szablińska M, et al. Laser applications in metal orthodontic bracket debonding: A systematic review. Appl Sci (Basel) 2025;15:927. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/app15020927. 16. Šimunović L, Stojanović J, Tečić K, Zadravec D, Meštrović S. The effect of MRI exposure on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of different bracket types. Dent J 2025;13:108. https:// doi.org/10.3390/dj13030108. 17. Sayed ME. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of aesthetic orthodontic brackets bonded to aged composite restorative resin materials. Polymers (Basel) 2025;17. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ polym 17050621. 18. Alayyash, Afnan & Shqaidef, Abedalrahman & Almaslamani, Manal & Alam, Mohammad. (2025). Effect of Various Orthodontic Adhesives on Shear Bond Strength After Thermal Cycling.. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 73-77. 10.3329/ bjms. v24i10.79159. 19. Kazlauskaitė G, Vaitiekūnas R, Lopatienė K, Jutas A, Palesik B, Smailienė D. The impact of temperature on the shear bond strength of conventional multi-step and self-adhesive orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2025;25:189. https://doi.org/ 10. 1186/s12903-025-05515-3. 20. Sen Yilmaz B, Yildirim ZB, Seker ED, OzdenF, Kurt G. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesiveswith integrated primer: A comparative study. APOS Trends Orthod, doi:10.25259/APOS_218_2022 (PDF) Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives with integrated primer: A comparative study. Available from:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368942024_Evaluation_of_shear_bond_strength_of_orthodontic_adhesives_with_integrated_primer_A_comparative_study [accessed Mar 27 2025]. 21. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 1980;77:269–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90082-2. 22. King L, Smith RT, Wendt SL Jr, Behrents RG. Bond strengths of lingual orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured composite resins cured by transillumination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:312–5. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0889-5406 (87)90172-7. 23. Alomar MH, Massoud N, Hajeer MY, Kharma H, Jomah DH. Evaluation of the conventional acid-etching system and the self-etching primer in bonding metallic orthodontic brackets: An in-vitro and in-vivo study. Cureus 2024;16:e72226. https:// doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72226 24. Naji SM, Mohammad MH, Enan ET, Tawfik MA. Different Wire Surface Treatments on Adhesion Efficacy of Orthodontic Fixed Retainer: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25:677–83. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3726. 25. Khalid, A. R., & Al Jwary, E. T. (2024). The shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets after surface conditioning of Zirconia, Ceramic and E. max models. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(3),387–398.https://doi.org/10. 55214/ 25768484.v8i3.1664 26. Gonçalves CM, Silva VR da, Pecorari VGA, Martins LRM, Santos ECA. Shear bond strength of different orthodontic bracket bonding systems on saliva- contaminated enamel: In vitro. J Media Crit [Internet]. 2024 Dec 9 [cited 2025 Mar 22];10(26):e142. Available from: https:// journal mediacritiques.com/index.php/jmc/article/view/142 27. Alam el deen, A. E. M., Dehis, H., ElAbbasy, D. Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Conventional Metal Brackets To Enamel Using Two Different Orthodontic Composites And Adhesive Systems: An In-Vitro Study. Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 2025; 28(1): 149-157. doi: 10.21608/ ajdsm. 2024. 346839.1594