Published December 10, 2025 | Version v1
Publication Open

The Ethical Imperative to Restrict General-Purpose AI: A Kantian Analysis

Authors/Creators

Description

This essay examines the ethical risks associated with unrestricted personal use of generative AI and large language models through a Kantian ethical lens. Drawing on real-world case studies of psychological harm, self-harm, and suicide, it highlights the urgent need for careful regulation and design of AI systems. The analysis contrasts Kantian ethics with alternative frameworks, including natural law and existentialist approaches, noting their respective limitations in addressing AI-related harms. Practical recommendations for developers, policymakers, and society are provided, emphasizing duty of care, respect for persons, and moral responsibility in the deployment of AI technologies. This work is intended for independent researchers, ethicists, and policymakers concerned with the moral and societal implications of AI.

Files

Files (36.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c7550cca2f037305be5cca05ae01959e
36.1 kB Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Other
Hobkirk-Capps, V. (2025). The Ethical Imperative to Restrict General-Purpose AI: A Kantian Analysis. Zenodo.