The Ethical Imperative to Restrict General-Purpose AI: A Kantian Analysis
Authors/Creators
Description
This essay examines the ethical risks associated with unrestricted personal use of generative AI and large language models through a Kantian ethical lens. Drawing on real-world case studies of psychological harm, self-harm, and suicide, it highlights the urgent need for careful regulation and design of AI systems. The analysis contrasts Kantian ethics with alternative frameworks, including natural law and existentialist approaches, noting their respective limitations in addressing AI-related harms. Practical recommendations for developers, policymakers, and society are provided, emphasizing duty of care, respect for persons, and moral responsibility in the deployment of AI technologies. This work is intended for independent researchers, ethicists, and policymakers concerned with the moral and societal implications of AI.
Files
Files
(36.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c7550cca2f037305be5cca05ae01959e
|
36.1 kB | Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- Other
- Hobkirk-Capps, V. (2025). The Ethical Imperative to Restrict General-Purpose AI: A Kantian Analysis. Zenodo.