There is a newer version of the record available.

Published December 9, 2025 | Version v7

The Golden-Structured Substrate: Emergence of Gravity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chiral Matter from a Single Field

Authors/Creators

Description

This monograph develops a unified framework in which general relativity, quantum me-
chanics, Dirac fermions, and internal symmetry structure emerge from a single nonlinear
substrate governed by a stability selection principle. The central axiom requires that phys-
ically realized configurations avoid resonant self-amplification; under standard Diophantine
conditions, this uniquely selects the golden ratio φ as the equilibrium modulus of the sub-
strate scalar field.
The resulting “golden vacuum” fixes the effective gravitational coupling via a non-
minimal ξϕ2R term, determines the acoustic propagation metric that coarse-grains to Ein-
stein’s equations, and generates Schr¨odinger dynamics through the Madelung hydrodynamic
transform. Topological defects in the complex substrate field yield a Z16 set of angular
vacua, and the associated Jackiw–Rebbi index produces sixteen chiral fermionic zero modes,
matching the 16 of Spin(10), together with a Higgs-like radial excitation.
Golden-ratio monodromy identities further explain the factor of 3 in GR perihelion pre-
cession and generate curvature-induced corrections to the electromagnetic coupling that
reproduce the observed fine-structure constant to ppm accuracy. Together these results
demonstrate that Einstein, Schr¨odinger, Dirac, and quantum-field-theoretic structures ap-
pear not as independent inputs, but as correlated emergent shadows of a single φ-structured
substrate.

Notes

Author Note

I am not a physicist by training, and I have no formal background in theoretical physics.
This work began as an intuitive picture, and I used AI tools to help translate that picture into the standard language of field theory and general relativity, as well as to identify existing concepts that resemble parts of the intuition.
The model is speculative and exploratory.
I welcome correction from experts wherever the mathematics or physical assumptions are incomplete or incorrect.

Several conceptual tensions motivated this work:

  1. General relativity’s factor of three in perihelion precession.
    GR robustly predicts a universal coefficient of 3 in orbital precession, yet most modern frameworks do not explain why this specific number appears so naturally.
    This suggested exploring whether the correction might arise from deeper geometric or dynamical structure in the vacuum.

  2. Dirac quantization working elegantly for U(1) but becoming unnatural for larger gauge groups.
    This has long hinted to me that quantization might originate not purely from group theory, but from topological excitations of a structured vacuum—much like Skyrmions, Hopfions, or soliton-based models where conserved charges arise geometrically.

  3. The possibility that particles are not fundamental points or strings, but soliton-like field excitations.
    Skyrmions in nuclear physics and solitons in nonlinear field theories demonstrate that stable, quantized, particle-like objects can emerge from smooth fields.
    This inspired the idea that “strings” might be better understood as stable soliton trajectories shaped by the vacuum’s topology.

  4. Keplerian orbits may represent the underlying true geometry, with GR corrections acting as a lensing-like effect of the vacuum medium.
    Instead of modifying the orbit itself, the substrate may modify how motion is observed—analogous to optical refraction, acoustic metrics, or effective-index media.
    This viewpoint aligns with analogue-gravity research and helped motivate reinterpreting GR corrections as emerging from the substrate rather than replacing Newtonian geometry.

These motivations led to the assumption that the vacuum might possess both:

  • a bare Planck-state configuration (using measured Planck units), and

  • a dynamically preferred non-resonant equilibrium, mathematically connected to the golden ratio through stability arguments reminiscent of KAM theory.

Under this assumption, many structures familiar from physics—GR’s factor-of-three correction, soliton-like particle excitations, quantized charges, chirality, possible curvature shifts in α, and the organization of modes into discrete sectors—appeared without introducing new mathematical machinery.

This manuscript should not be read as a final theory or complete derivation.
It is an attempt to express a coherent intuitive picture in formal terms and to explore whether a single organizing principle might underlie several otherwise separate phenomena.
If any part of this work is incorrect, I welcome explanation; if any part is useful, I hope those with proper expertise can refine it.

My goal is to participate in the scientific process by offering a clear speculative framework and inviting critique—nothing more.

Files

constants.pdf

Files (880.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f051d53a6cde1e36c229ad0c46cf0208
269.5 kB Preview Download
md5:72b45fc81bf934e2a7a0782532d95403
225.1 kB Preview Download
md5:3e857ecaef0378726309e294b7a4db4e
11.8 kB Download
md5:03c62134656ccbe7e7ee99108056cddf
374.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References