Published December 8, 2025 | Version v1
Preprint Open

A Novel Reformulation of Gravity as Spatial Flow under Curvature Constraints Reinterpreted by Amar's Modified Agile River Model Theory

Authors/Creators

Description

Amar's Modified Agile River (AMAR) model theory reinterprets Gravity not as a curvature of space but as a dynamic inward flow of co-ordinate space toward massive objects. This flow halts acceleration upon reaching the Universal Speed Limit (c), implying a finite gravitational potential and introducing the concept of a Universal Gravity Limit (UGL). Consequently, this model challenges the traditional notion of singularities within black holes, predicting instead a core with Finite and Uniform Gravity. The theory offers an alternative that retains the relativistic framework but proposes a Maximum Gravitational Potential, replacing singularities with a stable core. This paper proposes a comprehensive observational campaign using next-generation instruments to test the predictions of this theory, especially in strong-field regimes such as near black holes and in the solar system. This theory also proposes a conceptual bridge between Gravity and Quantum Field Theory in deeper level.

 

Files

Files (218.2 kB)

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2025-12-08

References

  • Ashtekar, A., & Bojowald, M. (2006). Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/2/008
  • Amati, L., et al. (2018). The LISA Pathfinder mission: Testing general relativity in space. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(9), 094001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aab0f3
  • Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration. (2019). First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875(1), L1. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7
  • Galilei, G. (1632). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (S. Drake, Trans., 1967). University of California Press.
  • Hamilton, A. J. S., & Lisle, J. P. (2008). The river model of black holes. American Journal of Physics, 76(6), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2830526
  • Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large-Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press.
  • Visser, M. (1999). The holographic principle and the river model of black holes.
  • S. Chandrasekhar, "The Maximum Mass of Ideal White Dwarfs," Astrophysical Journal, 74, 81 (1931). DOI: 10.1086/143324.
  • S. Chandrasekhar, "The Highly Collapsed Configurations of a Stellar Mass," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 95, 207–225 (1935). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/95.3.207.L. D. Landau, "On the Theory of Stars," Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 1, 285 (1932). (Early precursor to the Chandrasekhar limit.
  • L. D. Landau, "On the Theory of Stars," Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 1, 285 (1932). (Early precursor to the Chandrasekhar limit.)
  • R. C. Tolman, "Static Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations for Spheres of Fluid," Physical Review, 55, 364–373 (1939). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.55.364.
  • J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, "On Massive Neutron Cores," Physical Review, 55, 374–381 (1939). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.55.374.
  • S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, "Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects," Wiley-Interscience (1983). Standard textbook reference for Chandrasekhar and TOV limits.
  • P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev, "Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure," Springer (2007). Modern treatment of TOV equations and neutron-star structure.
  • J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, "Neutron Star Structure and the Equation of State," Astrophysical Journal, 550, 426–442 (2001). DOI: 10.1086/319702