Published November 30, 2025 | Version v1

Diesel or Jatropha Biodiesel? A life cycle assessment approach for sustainable energy decisions

  • 1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
  • 2. ECROT Department, Faculty of Environmental and Natural Resource Engineering, Zambeze University, Chimoio, Mozambique.

Description

This study compares the environmental and economic performance of diesel and Jatropha biodiesel using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and cost analysis for a functional unit of 1,000 km traveled. Results indicate that Jatropha biodiesel reduces overall environmental impact by approximately 37%, primarily due to net negative CO₂ emissions from carbon sequestration during cultivation, and offers significant improvements in global warming potential, fossil fuel depletion, and particulate matter formation. However, biodiesel requires 111.1 liters versus 100 liters of diesel for the same distance, reflecting its lower energy density (37 MJ/L vs. 43 MJ/L), and incurs a 42.7% higher cost per unit of useful energy (USD 0.157/MJ vs. USD 0.09/MJ), raising the total cost for 1,000 km from USD 136 to USD 225.53. Qualitatively, Jatropha biodiesel emerges as a cleaner alternative with strong climate benefits, but its competitiveness is constrained by higher production costs, land use, and water consumption. These findings highlight the need for technological improvements and policy support to enhance the economic viability of biodiesel while leveraging its environmental advantages.

Files

WJARR-2025-3875.pdf

Files (697.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4cf8d65d837ccb537447ade56719172c
697.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details