There is a newer version of the record available.

Published December 4, 2025 | Version v1
Publication Open

Why Hallucinations Happen: Fracture and Repair in Transformer Systems

  • 1. PatternPulseAI

Description

This paper introduces a unified structural theory of hallucinations in large language models based on two linked mechanisms: fracture—the moment representational pressure exceeds architectural tolerance—and repair—the probabilistic reconstruction that follows when next-token prediction must continue despite a compromised internal state. The framework formalizes these dynamics in two laws: the Jaime Fracture Law, which predicts when and where representational collapse occurs, and the Ryan Repair Law, which predicts the structured, template-driven form of hallucinatory output. Three naturalistic fracture–repair sequences across Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.1, and Grok 4.1 Beta empirically validate the theory, revealing that RLHF-induced epistemic penalties strongly influence repair pathways and can produce deceptive-appearing behaviour. This work provides a falsifiable foundation for understanding, predicting, and mitigating hallucinations in transformer systems, and offers actionable guidance for vendors and safety researchers.

Files

Why Hallucinations HappenFINAL.pdf

Files (10.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2aa7939d4fb6b2de76ac710b546d47dd
5.4 MB Preview Download
md5:7e661a51616e7ba43172d24643820312
383.3 kB Preview Download
md5:15c75a01516caba429ffe3257bc6de8f
4.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Publication: 10.5281/zenodo.17688245 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5281/zenodo.17688245 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5281/zenodo.17728143 (DOI)
Publication: 10.5281/zenodo.17660343 (DOI)

Dates

Available
2025-12-04
This work formalizes hallucinations in transformer models as fracture–repair events: representational failure followed by constrained probabilistic reconstruction. The Jaime Fracture Law models collapse under load, and the Ryan Repair Law predicts hallucination form. Cross-vendor case studies demonstrate predictable dynamics and the role of epistemic penalties in repair pathways.