Published November 30, 2025 | Version v1
Preprint Open

Why We Must Move Beyond the Cycle of Violence: Introducing Escalation Pattern Analysis (EPA)

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Women's Safety Initiative

Description

Lenore Walker’s Cycle of Violence marked an early conceptual milestone in understanding intimate partner violence, yet its explanatory power has been eclipsed by contemporary theoretical developments. The model’s cyclical, incident-bound formulation fails to accommodate the relational, patterned, and structurally embedded nature of coercive control, as articulated by Stark (2007) and subsequent scholars. Moreover, the cycle’s episodic logic is inconsistent with empirical findings on escalation trajectories, lethality markers, and the temporal compression of harm identified in modern femicide research. These limitations position the Cycle of Violence as an important historical artefact rather than a viable analytical framework for present-day scholarship. This paper addresses that theoretical gap by advancing Escalation Pattern Analysis (EPA): a behaviorally anchored, tri-axis model designed specifically to interpret IPV as an evolving trajectory rather than a repetitive loop. EPA uniquely offers an operationalized mechanism, evaluating Frequency, Intensity, and Inhibitory Decline, that precisely tracks escalation over time. This capability enables a structured and quantifiable method for risk assessment and intervention, distinguishing EPA from traditional cycles. By clarifying the nature and stages of escalation, EPA delivers practical and analytical advantages for practitioners aiming to intervene before high-harm or lethal outcomes. Incorporating recent scholarship on coercive control, economic control, stalking, technological abuse, and homicide progression, this paper demonstrates that modern IPV requires models that capture progression and change. EPA provides a distinctive, empirically grounded lens for understanding how abuse transitions from control to high-harm and lethality, setting it apart from earlier models.

Keywords: intimate partner violence, coercive control, Escalation Pattern Analysis (EPA), lethality assessment, femicide, risk assessment, patterned abusive behaviors, domestic abuse dynamics

Files

Why We Must Move Beyond the Cycle of Violence - Introducing Escalation Pattern Analysis (EPA).pdf

Files (375.7 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Bejenaru, A. (2011). Battered women: Victims or survivors? Social Change Review, 9(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2016-0016
  • Campbell, J. C., Webster, D. W., & Glass, N. (2009). The Danger Assessment: Validation of a Lethality Risk Assessment Instrument for Intimate Partner Femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 653-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317180
  • Dichter, M. E., Thomas, K. A., Crits-Christoph, P., Ogden, S. N., & Rhodes, K. V. (2018). Coercive control in intimate partner violence: Relationship with women's experience of violence, use of violence, and danger. Psychology of Violence, 8(5), 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000158
  • Dobash, R. P. (2004). Women's Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle. British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324-349. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh026
  • Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., & Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341
  • Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11-12), 743-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6
  • Futures Without Violence. (2020). The cycle of violence: Why it is no longer widely used to understand domestic violence. https://promising.futureswithoutviolence.org/the-cycle-of-domestic-violence/
  • Glass, N., Laughon, K., Campbell, J., Block, C. R., Hanson, G., Sharps, P. W., & Taliaferro, E. (2008). Non-fatal Strangulation is an Important Risk Factor for Homicide of Women. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35(3), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.065
  • Hardesty, J. L., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2020). A Socioecological Perspective on Intimate Partner Violence Research: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 454-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12652
  • Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Choice Reviews Online, 46(11), 46-6509-46-6509. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-6509
  • Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). DIFFERENTIATION AMONG TYPES OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: RESEARCH UPDATE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x
  • McLeod, D. A., Pharris, A., Boyles, E., Winkles, R., & Stafford, W. (2021). The model of systemic relational violence: Conceptualizing IPV as a method of continual and enforced domination. Trauma Care, 1(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare1020009
  • Monckton-Smith, J. (2020). Intimate Partner Femicide: Using Foucauldian Analysis to Track an Eight Stage Progression to Homicide. Violence Against Women, 26(11), 1267-1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219863876
  • Myhill, A. (2015). Measuring coercive control: What can we learn from national population surveys? Violence Against Women, 21(3), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214568032
  • Myhill, A., & Hohl, K. (2019). The "golden thread": Coercive control and risk assessment for domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(21–22), 4477–4497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516675464
  • Serrata, J. (2017). Cycles of Abuse. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384269.n136
  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Wilcox, P. (2006). Surviving Domestic Violence. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506183
  • Woodlock, D. (2017). The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216646277