Empowering sustainability assessment of energy storage
Authors/Creators
-
Ersoy, Hüseyin
(Researcher)1
-
Baumann, Manuel
(Researcher)1
-
Erakca, Merve
(Researcher)1
-
Jasper, Friedrich
(Researcher)1
- Ferraro, Marco (Researcher)2
-
Pechancova, Viera
(Researcher)3
- Stuhm, Patrick (Researcher)1
- Cellura, Maurizio (Researcher)4
- Longo, Sonia (Researcher)4
- Maniscalo, Manfredi Picciotto (Researcher)2
-
Hischier, Roland
(Researcher)5
- Busto, Chiara6
- Tacca, Alessandra6
- Dickler, Sebastian7
- Zapp, Petra8
-
Wulf, Christina8
-
Lechón, Yolanda9
- Haase, Martina1
-
Weil, Marcel1
- Ramos, Tomas B.10, 11, 12, 13
-
Passerini, Stefano
-
1.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
-
2.
Institute for Advanced Energy Technologies
-
3.
Tomas Bata University in Zlín
-
4.
University of Palermo
-
5.
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
- 6. ENI S.p.A., Italy
- 7. Institut NOWUM-Energy, Fachhochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany
-
8.
Forschungszentrum Jülich
-
9.
Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas
- 10. CENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research
- 11. CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute
- 12. NOVA School of Science and Technology
- 13. NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal
Description
Energy storage (ES) plays a vital role in decarbonizing energy systems, yet its sustainability implications remain critical during its rapid deployment across mobile and stationary applications. This study presents the first systematic literature review focused on the assessment methods applied to ES systems in the sustainability context, by analyzing 205 peer-reviewed studies from the past five years. The review identifies Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as the most commonly employed methods, with a strong technological focus on hydrogen-based systems and batteries. In contrast, a limited number of studies consider social aspects in the sustainability context. An increasing trend toward integrated economic and environmental assessments is observed, though their coherence is often limited due to the absence of a standardized methodological framework. Most studies apply narrow system boundaries, frequently omitting critical life cycle stages such as the use phase and end-of-life. This paper provides a methodological overview of applied approaches, summarizes key indicators and gaps, and offers recommendations to enhance the comprehensiveness of ES sustainability assessments. Additionally, targeted suggestions are delivered for practitioners, method developers and policy actors to improve the quality and applicability of future assessment practices.
Files
Huseyin_article.pdf
Files
(2.6 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:2956849680ee77f899a234abbf8ba81b
|
2.6 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Funding
Dates
- Accepted
-
2025-09-22