There is a newer version of the record available.

Published November 25, 2025 | Version 1.0 (Canon Edition)

Semantic Stability Engineering - Field Definition Paper (Canon Edition)

Description

This Field Definition Paper formally establishes Semantic Stability Engineering (SSE) as an independent scientific discipline. SSE investigates the internal, time-dependent 
meaning structures of adaptive computational systems. It introduces the ontological status of semantic states, distinguishes interpretive drift from statistical concept drift, 
defines the transition and stability operators of SSE, and presents the field’s formal axioms, non-subsumption clauses, drift classes, boundary criteria, and epistemic basis. 
This document provides the canonical foundations and normative framework for all subsequent theoretical, empirical and architectural research within SSE.

Semantic Stability Engineering
Meaning Evolution
Interpretive Drift
Semantic State
Semantic Stability
Transition Operator
Coherence Window
Stability Criterion
Auditability

Files

Field_Definition_Paper__en_.pdf

Files (194.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:91c2f466d1be81b15116b81c68e2d180
194.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Created
2025-04-01
Initial formal release of the SnapOS audit model and semantic traceability framework (version 1.0).

References

  • Chaitin, G. J. (1977). Algorithmic Information Theory. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 21(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.214.0350
  • Håstad, J. (1987). Computational Limitations of Small-Depth Circuits. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/14958
  • Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01700692
  • Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199232383
  • Souly, A. et al. (2025). Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-Constant Number of Samples. Alan Turing Institute / Anthropic / UK AI Security Institute. arXiv:2508.03114.
  • Bowen, D. et al. (2024). Data Poisoning in LLMs: Jailbreak-Tuning and Scaling Laws. arXiv:2408.02946.