Published October 31, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Photovoltage in c-Si/mc-Si Solar Cells: Grain Size, Base Thickness, and Illumination Mode: A Mathcad-Based Analytical Model

Description

We present a three-dimensional diffusion–recombination model that yields closed-form expressions for the photovoltage Vph of crystalline-silicon (c-Si/mc-Si) solar cells under front, rear, and dual illumination. The framework solves the minority-carrier continuity equation in (x,y,z) with finite lateral dimensions (gx, gy), explicitly retaining geometric eigenmodes and boundary conditions, and parameterizes microstructure through a grain size g and device geometry through the base thickness H. We introduce carrier-collection velocity (CCV) at the junction as the operating-point knob connecting transport to the diode relation for voltage. The analysis clarifies three regimes:

      i.     a low-CCV extraction-limited regime (open-circuit-like for current),

    ii.     a transition regime where the slope of Vph versus CCV diminishes, and

  iii.     a high-CCV efficient-collection regime (short-circuit-like current plateau), in which Vph is lowest for a given generation level.

Parametric results show that Vph decreases with increasing CCV, consistent with the reduction of steady-state excess density and quasi-Fermi-level splitting. Larger grains systematically increase Vph by lowering grain-boundary recombination, while thinner bases shorten transport paths and curb bulk SRH losses. Front illumination is weakly sensitive to H (generation near the junction); rear illumination shows a strong dependence on H (longer diffusion paths); and dual illumination raises the voltage baseline and mitigates thickness penalties by shortening average collection distances. At fixed CCV near open-circuit, the voltage generally increases monotonically with grain size across illumination modes; in dual illumination we observe “blockwise” grouping by H, consistent with enhanced generation and reduced path lengths.

Design guidance follows directly: prioritize large grains (g0.01 cm), moderate H (≈ 150 µm) unless superior passivation is available, and dual illumination when applicable. Low-J0, low-SRV passivating contacts lift the entire Vph-CCV characteristic. The model’s closed-form nature enables rapid exploration of geometry, microstructure, operation couplings and provides physically transparent targets for bifacial c-Si optimization.

Files

EJAET-12-10-37-46.pdf

Files (857.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e6259e20fbbcb0f784009d911c17a4fc
857.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • [1]. Rodríguez-Gallegos, C. D.; Liu, H.; Gandhi, O.; Singh, J. P.; Reindl, T.; Buonassisi, T.; Peters, I. M. Global Techno-Economic Performance of Bifacial and Tracking Photovoltaic Systems. Joule 4(7), 1514–1541 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.005. ADS
  • [2]. Ghafiri, S.; Darnon, M.; Davigny, A.; Trovão, J. P. F.; Abbes, D. A comprehensive performance evaluation of bifacial photovoltaic modules (year-long study, Canada). EPJ Photovoltaics 15, 28 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2024025 EPJ PV+1
  • [3]. Marion, B.; MacAlpine, S.; Deline, C.; Asgharzadeh, A.; Toor, F.; Riley, D.; Stein, J.; Hansen, C. A Practical Irradiance Model for Bifacial PV Modules. In: Proc. 44th IEEE PVSC, Washington, DC 2017. DOI: 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366322. NREL+1
  • [4]. Vogt, M. R.; Chan, N. L. A.; Santbergen, R.; et al. Developing an energy rating for bifacial photovoltaic modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 31(7), 814–829 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3678. Wiley Online Library+1
  • [5]. Allen, T. G.; Bullock, J.; Yang, X.; Javey, A.; De Wolf, S. Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. Nature Energy 4, 914–928 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0463-6. Nature+1
  • [6]. Limodio, G.; Yang, G.; De Groot, Y.; Procel, P.; Mazzarella, L.; Weber, A. W.; Isabella, O.; Zeman, M. Implantation-based passivating contacts for crystalline silicon front/rear contacted solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 28(12), 1314–1327 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3250. Wiley Online Library+1
  • [7]. Kang, D.; Phua, E. J.; Wu, F.; et al. Long-term stability study of the passivation quality of polysilicon-based passivation layers for silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 215, 110691 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110691. ADS
  • [8]. Usami, N.; Yamakoshi, K.; Kutsukake, K.; et al. Multicrystalline informatics: advancing multicrystalline silicon for solar cells. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 2024. DOI:10.1080/14686996.2024.2396272. Tandfonline+1
  • [9]. Richter, A.; Glunz, S. W.; Werner, F.; Schmidt, J.; Cuevas, A. Improved quantitative description of Auger recombination in crystalline silicon. Physical Review B 86(16), 165202 2012. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.165202
  • [10]. Kopecek, R.; Libal, J. Bifacial Photovoltaics 2021: Status, Opportunities and Challenges. Energies 14 (2021) 2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082076
  • [11]. Allen, T. G.; Bullock, J.; Yang, X.; Javey, A.; De Wolf, S. Passivating Contacts for Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells: An Historical Perspective and Review. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202304338
  • [12]. Yu, P. Y.; Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties (4th ed.). Springer, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00710-1 https://sci-hub.mk/10.1007/978-3-642-00710-1
  • [13]. Lundstrom, M. Fundamentals of Carrier Transport (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2000. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618611.
  • [14]. Reidt, S.; Pieters, B. E. Analytical modelling for p-i-n structured semiconductor devices. AIP Advances 9 2019 025102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5045090
  • [15]. Schinke, C.; et al. Uncertainty analysis for the coefficient of band-to-band absorption of crystalline silicon. AIP Advances 5 2015 067168. DOI:10.1063/1.4923379
  • [16]. Le, A. H. T.; Nie, S.; Ochoa, E. P.; et al. Determination of Temperature- and Carrier-Dependent Surface Recombination in Silicon. Solar RRL 8 2024 2400191. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202400191
  • [17]. Sze, S. M.; Ng, K. K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices (3ᵉ éd.). Wiley, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/0470068329. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/0470068329
  • [18]. Fukuda, Y.; Kutsukake, K.; Kojima, T.; Usami, N. Electrical activity of grain boundaries in silicon via systematic control of structural parameters. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 132, 025102. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0094876
  • [19]. Yakubu, R. O.; Ustun, T. S.; Ozsoy, E.; et al. A systematic literature review of the bifacial photovoltaic technology. IET Energy Systems Integration 2024. https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12421
  • [20]. Sze, S. M.; Ng, K. K. ibid. (transport/collection framework). DOI: 10.1002/0470068329. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/0470068329