Discrete 3D+3D Temporal Geometry: A Unified Framework for Galactic Dynamics, Cosmology, and Quantum Coherence

How I Built a Unified Physical Theory… and Why I'm Asking the Scientific Community to Validate It
My name is Simone Calzighetti. I am not a professor, nor a university researcher. I don't have a PhD, nor a laboratory. I am a theoretical physics enthusiast — and I had an intuition that has evolved into a complete theoretical framework.
I have developed a geometric theory of spacetime with six dimensions: three spatial and three temporal (3D+3D). Two temporal dimensions are compactified at galactic scales (L₂ ≈ 9.5 light-years, L₃ ≈ 6.0 light-years), generating emergent gravitational effects that could explain phenomena attributed to dark matter — without exotic particles, through pure geometry.
The Work Done
With the help of artificial intelligence (particularly Claude, whom I've nicknamed "Lucy"), I have developed:
10 academic papers (~500 pages, ~650 equations) covering mathematical foundations, galactic dynamics, gravitational lensing, cosmic structure, 6D thermodynamics, quantum decoherence, black holes, and chronology protection
Empirical validation on real data:
175 SPARC galaxies: 33 km/s RMS with zero free parameters per galaxy (vs 190 km/s for ΛCDM)
NANOGrav pulsar timing: 30-year and 19-year periodicities confirmed at 23σ
85 SLACS lensing systems: Einstein radius deficit predicted and observed
Solar System constraints: compatibility with Cassini, Lunar Laser Ranging, Mercury perihelion precession
Rigorous UV completion via asymptotic safety: fixed point with only 2 relevant operators, making the theory maximally predictive
Derivation of quantum entanglement from extra temporal dimensions: Einstein's "spooky action at a distance" emerges as causal propagation through (τ₂, τ₃)
Pre-registered predictions for future surveys (Euclid 2026, DESI): characteristic scale λ₁₃ = 0.856 ± 0.030 Mpc in the cosmic web, derived with zero free parameters
Why I Cannot Validate It Alone
I lack the academic credentials to guarantee absolute mathematical correctness of every step. I have no access to experimental instruments for independent tests. I have worked in isolation, with AI as my only collaborator — which introduces risks of systematic biases that might escape my notice.
What I Am Asking
I explicitly request the scientific community to:
Verify the mathematical derivations
Criticize the physical assumptions
Refute the predictions with data
Improve the framework where necessary
I have uploaded all documents, codes, simulations, and predictions. Every claim is accompanied by explicit formulas and verifiable data. Key predictions were deposited on Zenodo BEFORE the release of observational data, to avoid post-hoc fitting.
I am not seeking confirmation: I am seeking truth.
If this theory is wrong, I want to know why — and learn from the mistake. If it is correct, I want it to be rigorously tested. If it is partially valid, I want it to be refined by minds more expert than mine.
Science is not certainty. It is openness, dialogue, falsifiability. This is my contribution — offered in complete transparency, with humility, and with the hope that someone with the appropriate expertise will take a look.
Simone Calzighetti
Abbiategrasso, Italy
November 2025