Deterministic Nuclear Structure, Fission, and Fusion from Curvature Dynamics in Trembling Spacetime Relativity
Description
Conventional nuclear models, from liquid-drop parametrizations to shell and density-functional theories, describe many global trends in binding and decay but remain probabilistic and heavily parameterized. They do not explain, from first principles, persistent anomalies such as deep sub-barrier fusion hindrance, odd-even staggering in fission yields, or the long half-life of 14C. This work extends Trembling Spacetime Relativity Theory (TSRT) into the nuclear domain as a deterministic geometric framework for structure, stability, and transformation. In TSRT, each nucleus is a localized trembling-curvature eigenmode whose stability results from sustained suppression of intrinsic spacetime curvature. Decay is a causal relaxation of this suppression and is modeled as curvature reconfiguration rather than a stochastic transition. Binding, fission, fusion, and decay thus emerge from the same geometric dynamics. Using a single global normalization fixed once on 60Co, the TSRT formulation reproduces experimental half-lives across beta decay, alpha decay, and spontaneous fission over more than twenty orders of magnitude, with a mean logarithmic deviation below one part in a million. No shell closures, pairing corrections, empirical preformation factors, or per-nucleus tuning are invoked. The 14C anomaly follows from its geometric beta-path curvature without adjustable hindrance. All Q-values, barrier actions, and emission rates follow deterministically from the spacetime metric and its curvature energy, and TSRT provides a causal mechanism for mass–energy conversion as curvature redistribution. TSRT also reproduces the emergence of neutron magic numbers as geometric minima of the curvature–stiffness map, matching the conventional magic sequence without quantum postulates. Deep sub-barrier fusion hindrance arises from geometric suppression of trembling-mode overlap; odd-even staggering in fission yields originates from phase-locked neck eigenmodes at scission; and electron-screening shifts reflect renormalization of near-field electromagnetic curvature. These effects are consistent with the trembling-spacetime geometry that also underlies atomic structure, photon emission, and gravitational redshift. Quantitatively, TSRT reproduces absolute nuclear half-lives from milliseconds up to about ten quintillion years, with mean logarithmic deviation below one millionth, using only three global constants fixed once per mode. This accuracy surpasses conventional microscopic and empirical models—which typically yield mean logarithmic deviations between one tenth and one hundredth—by roughly ten thousand times, showing that nuclear decay is a deterministic geometric phenomenon rather than a stochastic process. All physical quantities are expressed in absolute SI and nuclear units, with TSRT calibration constants tied to fundamental curvature and lifetime anchors without empirical scaling. TSRT also reproduces absolute fission energetics, yielding a total energy release of 170.0 MeV for thermal-neutron-induced U-235 (n,f) without any per-observable tuning. By deriving nuclear binding, decay, reaction timescales, and mass–energy conversion from a single geometric principle, TSRT establishes a unified, predictive, and reproducible description of nuclear stability and transformation. It bridges microscopic nuclear structure with macroscopic relativistic consistency, showing that mass–energy balance and decay kinetics are natural manifestations of curvature redistribution in trembling spacetime.
Files
2025-11-21_Declercq_Nuclear_Structure.pdf
Files
(4.7 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ece83496f98eff615736312e125f039d
|
4.7 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- [1] Richard S. Westfall. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press, 1980. [2] Isaac Newton. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Joseph Streater, London, 1687. [3] Roger Highfield and Paul Carter. The Private Lives of Albert Einstein. Faber & Faber, 1993. [4] Abraham Pais. Subtle is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press, 1982. [5] Albert Einstein. Ist die trägheit eines körpers von seinem energieinhalt abhängig? Annalen der Physik, 323(13):639–641, 1905. doi:10.1002/andp.19053231314. [6] Ruth Lewin Sime. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1996. [7] Martin J. Sherwin. A World Destroyed: Hiroshima and Its Legacies. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 3rd edition, 2003. [8] Alvin M. Weinberg. The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer. American Institute of Physics, 1994. [9] ITER Organization. Iter: The world's largest fusion experiment. https://www.iter.org, 2023. Accessed: 2023-11-01. [10] Jr. V. E. Viola and Glenn T. Seaborg. Nuclear systematics of the heavy elements—ii lifetimes for alpha, beta and spontaneous fission decay. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 28(4):741–761, apr 1966. doi:10.1016/0022-1902(66)80412-8. [11] P. Möller, A. J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, H. Sagawa, et al. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 109-110:1–204, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002. [12] Nico F. Declercq. A unified geometric theory of trembling spacetime relativity. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15360946. [13] Nico F. Declercq. Corpuscular light in trembling spacetime: A geometric foun- dation for planck's radiation law and the limits of temperature. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15586864. [14] Nico F. Declercq. A geometric theory of atomic structure without quantum postulates. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15682930. [15] Nico F. Declercq. Causal entanglement from deterministic geodesic correlation in trembling spacetime. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15490040. [16] Nico F. Declercq. Emergence of 4d spacetime and cosmic expansion from causal geometry. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16656746. [17] Nico F. Declercq. The geometric origin and finite classification of fundamental particles in trembling spacetime. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15830692. [18] Nico F. Declercq. Beyond superposition and collapse: Double-slit interference from trem- bling spacetime geodesics. Zenodo, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15425854. [19] N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo. Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys., 79(11):116301, 2016. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301. [20] S. Goriely, Y. Sirois, A. Van Lauwe, and S. Hilaire. Systematic study of the odd-even staggering of fission fragments. Eur. Phys. J. A, 58(5):87, 2022. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00736-4. [21] E. G. Adelberger et al. Solar fusion. II. Proton-proton chain and cno cycles. Reviews of Modern Physics, 83(1):195–246, Feb 2011. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.195. [22] Niels Bohr and Fritz Kalckar. On the transmutation of atomic nuclei by impact of material particles. i. general theoretical remarks. Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., 14(10), 1936. [23] Niels Bohr and John Archibald Wheeler. The mechanism of nuclear fission. Phys. Rev., 56:426–450, 1939. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.426. [24] Maria Goeppert-Mayer. On closed shells in nuclei. Phys. Rev., 75(12):1969–1970, 1949. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1969. [25] Otto Haxel, J. Hans D. Jensen, and Hans E. Suess. On the "magic numbers" in nuclear structure. Phys. Rev., 75:1766, 1949. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.75.1766. [26] Michael Bender, Paul-Henri Heenen, and Paul-Gerhard Reinhard. Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75(1):121–180, 2003. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121. [27] D. Vretenar, A. V. Afanasjev, G. A. Lalazissis, and P. Ring. Relativistic hartree– bogoliubov theory: static and dynamic aspects of exotic nuclear structure. Phys. Rep., 409(3-4):101–259, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.001. [28] R. J. Furnstahl and K. Hebeler. New applications of renormalization group methods in nuclear physics. Rep. Prog. Phys., 76(12):126301, 2013. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/12/126301. [29] H.-W. Hammer, Sebastian König, and U. van Kolck. Nuclear effective field theory: status and perspectives. Rev. Mod. Phys., 92(2):025004, 2020. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.025004. [30] M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, N. Rowley, and A. M. Stefanini. Beyond the coherent cou- pled channels description of nuclear fusion. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82(7):1395–1398, 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1395. [31] C. L. Jiang et al. Systematic examination of the fusion hindrance in light and medium-mass systems. Phys. Rev. C, 99(5):054603, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054603. [32] C. Schmitt et al. Scission configuration and fission-fragment properties in the brownian shape-motion model. Nucl. Phys. A, 945:1–20, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.09.011. [33] F. Raiola et al. Enhanced electron screening in d(d,p)t for deuterated metals. Phys. Lett. B, 547(3-4):193–198, 2002. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02772-6. [34] A. Tumino et al. An increase in the 12C+12C fusion rate from resonances at astrophysical energies. Nature, 600(7889):250–254, 2021. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04133-7. [35] Nico F. Declercq. Tsrt nuclear data and reproducibility bundle, 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17637889. [36] Meng Wang, W.J. Huang, F.G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi. The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (ii). tables, graphs and references. Chinese Physics C, 45(3):030003, 2021. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf. [37] C. F. von Weizsäcker. Zur theorie der kernmassen. Zeitschrift für Physik, 96(7-8):431–458, 1935. doi:10.1007/BF01337700. [38] A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson. Collective and individual-particle aspects of nuclear structure. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Matematisk-Fysiske Meddelelser, 27(16):1–174, 1953. [39] V. M. Strutinsky. Shell effects in nuclear masses and deformation energies. Nucl. Phys. A, 95(2):420–442, 1967. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(67)90510-6. [40] V. M. Strutinsky. "shells" in deformed nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A, 122(1):1–33, 1968. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(68)90699-4. [41] John Bardeen, Leon N. Cooper, and J. Robert Schrieffer. Theory of superconductivity. Physical Review, 108(5):1175–1204, dec 1957. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175. [42] Leon N. Cooper. Bound electron pairs in a degenerate fermi gas. Physical Review, 104(4):1189–1190, nov 1956. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.104.1189. [43] J. Robert Schrieffer. Theory of Superconductivity. Benjamin, New York, 1964. [44] H. J. Lipkin. Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model. Annals of Physics, 9(2):272–291, 1960. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(60)90039-0. [45] Y. Nogami. Improved bcs method and its application to a model of superconductivity. Physical Review, 134(2B):B313–B317, apr 1964. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.134.B313. [46] W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki. Average nuclear properties. Annals of Physics, 55(3):395–505, 1969. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(69)90202-4. [47] R. D. Woods and D. S. Saxon. Diffuse surface optical model for nucleon-nuclei scattering. Physical Review, 95(2):577–578, 1954. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.577. [48] H. J. Specht. Nuclear fission. Reviews of Modern Physics, 46(4):773–787, 1974. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.46.773. [49] C. W. Reich. Historical note: How the double-humped fission barrier was discovered. Nuclear Physics News, 24(4):25–30, 2014. doi:10.1080/10619127.2014.964221. [50] Arnold Sommerfeld. Atombau und Spektrallinien, Band 2: Wellenmechanik. Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, 1939. This is the definitive German edition where the Coulomb wave functions and the parameter are thoroughly treated. [51] G. Gamow. Zur quantentheorie des atomkernes. Z. Phys., 51(3):204–212, 1928. doi:10.1007/BF01343196. [52] C. D. Ellis and W. A. Wooster. The average energy of disintegration of radium E. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 117(778):109–123, 1927. doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0172. [53] Wolfgang Pauli. Offener brief an die gruppe der radioaktiven bei der gau-vereinigung zu tübingen. Die Naturwissenschaften, 19(37):741–743, 1931. doi:10.1007/BF01521530. [54] F. Reines and C. L. Cowan, Jr. The neutrino. Nature, 178:446–449, 1956. doi:10.1038/178446a0. [55] Paul A. M. Dirac. The quantum theory of the emission and absorption of radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 114(767):243–265, 1927. [56] Enrico Fermi. Nuclear Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1950. A course of lectures by Enrico Fermi. Revised edition. See particularly the discussion of transition probabilities. [57] K. Langanke and G. Martínez-Pinedo. Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75(3):819–862, 2003. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.819. [58] J. Metzinger and R. Klapisch. Systematics of beta-strength functions. Phys. Rev. C, 38(4):3817–3829, 1988. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.38.3817. [59] B. T. Cleveland et al. Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector. Astrophys. J., 496(1):505–526, 1998. doi:10.1086/305343. [60] Y. Fukuda and others (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration). Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos. Physical Review Letters, 81:1562–1567, 1998. Definitive evidence for neutrino oscillations. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562. [61] H. Yukawa. On the interaction of elementary particles. i. Proc. Phys.-Math. Soc. Jpn., 17:48–57, 1935. URL: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ppms1912/17/0/17_0_48/_pdf. [62]David J. Gross and Frank Wilczek. Ultraviolet behavior of non- abelian gauge theories. Physical Review Letters, 30(26):1343–1346, 1973. arXiv:https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343. [63] Sheldon L. Glashow. Partial symmetries of weak interactions. Nuclear Physics, 22:579–588, 1961. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2. [64] Steven Weinberg. The quantum theory of fields: Foundations and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys., 68(1):1–9, 1996. This is a summary of his textbooks, which are the definitive treatise on the subject. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1. [65] Sven G. Nilsson. Binding states of individual nucleons in strongly deformed nuclei. Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk., 29(16):1–69, 1955. [66] John D. Huxley. Nuclear Reaction Rates in Hot Plasmas. Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1980. [67] William A. Fowler, Georgeanne R. Caughlan, and Barbara A. Zimmerman. Thermonu- clear reaction rates, II. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13:69–112, 1975. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.13.090175.000441. [68] E. Fermi. Possible production of elements of atomic number higher than 92. Nature, 133(3372):898–899, 06 1934. doi:10.1038/133898a0. [69] Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann. Über den nachweis und das verhalten der bei der be- strahlung des urans mittels neutronen entstehenden erdalkalimetalle. Naturwissenschaften, 27(1):11–15, 1939. doi:10.1007/BF01488241. [70] O. R. Frisch. Physical evidence for the division of heavy nuclei under neutron bombard- ment. Nature, 143(3616):276–276, 1939. doi:10.1038/143276a0. [71] H. L. Anderson. Assisting fermi at the dawn of the nuclear age. Physics Today, 25(7):40–47, 1972. doi:10.1063/1.3070928. [72] M. Arnould, S. Goriely, and K. Takahashi. The r-process of stellar nucleosynthesis: Astro- physics and nuclear physics achievements and mysteries. Physics Reports, 450(4):97–213, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.06.002. [73] A. N. Andreyev, K. Nishio, and K.-H. Schmidt. Nuclear fission: a review of exper- imental advances and phenomenology. Rep. Prog. Phys., 81(1):016301, 2018. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa82eb, doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa82eb. [74] U. Brosa, S. Grossmann, and A. Müller. Nuclear scission. Physics Reports, 197(4):167–262, 1990. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(90)90114-H. [75] Lise Meitner and Otto R. Frisch. Disintegration of uranium by neutrons: a new type of nuclear reaction. Nature, 143:239–240, 1939. doi:10.1038/143239a0. [76] Frédéric Joliot. Preuve expérimentale de la rupture explosive des noyaux d'uranium et de thorium sous l'action des neutrons. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 208:341–343, 1939. [77] H. L. Anderson, E. T. Booth, J. R. Dunning, E. Fermi, G. N. Glasoe, and F. G. Slack. The fission of uranium. Phys. Rev., 55(5):511–512, 1939. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.511.2. [78] R. M. Spector. Photofission of the heavy elements. Phys. Rev., 140(4B):B1034–B1042, 1965. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.B1034. [79] J. R. Nix. Calculation of fission barriers for heavy and superheavy nuclei. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci., 22:65–120, 1972. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.22.120172.000433. [80] Enrico Fermi. The development of the first chain reacting pile. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 90(1):20–24, 1946. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3301034. [81] J. F. Berger, M. Girod, and D. Gogny. Time-dependent quantum collec- tive dynamics applied to nuclear fission. Nuclear Physics A, 428:23–36, 1984. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(84)90240-9. [82] C.GolabekandC.Simenel.Inducedfissionof240puwithinareal-timemean-fieldapproach. Physical Review Letters, 103(4):042701, 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.042701. [83] Robley D. Evans. The Atomic Nucleus. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955. [84] J. Rayford Nix. Theory of fission nucleus dynamics and collective motion. Phys. Rev. C, 5(4):1262–1265, 1972. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.5.1262. [85] T. R. England and B. F. Rider. Evaluation and compilation of fission prod- uct yields. LA LA-UR-94-3106, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1994. URL: https://www-nds.iaea.org/publications/indc/nds-213/. [86] OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Endf/b-viii.0: U-235 isotope. Evaluated nuclear data file, National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2018. Accession Number: 13939. URL: https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/endf/b8.0/. [87] Niels Bohr. Neutron capture and nuclear constitution. Nature, 137:344–348, 1936. doi:10.1038/137344a0. [88] R. d'E. Atkinson and F. G. Houtermans. Zur frage der aufbaumöglichkeit der elemente in sternen. Z. Phys., 54(9):656–665, 1929. doi:10.1007/BF01341595. [89] Arthur S. Eddington. The internal constitution of the stars. The Observatory, 43:341–358, 1920. URL: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1920Obs....43..341E. [90] H. A. Bethe. Energy production in stars. Physical Review, 55(5):434–456, Mar 1939. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.434. [91] J. Chadwick. The existence of a neutron. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 136(830):692–708, 1932. doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0112. [92] E. U. Condon. Quantum mechanics and radioactive disintegration. Phys. Rev., 31(6):891– 894, 1928. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.31.891. [93] R. W. Gurney and E. U. Condon. Quantum mechanics and radioactive disintegration. Phys. Rev., 33(2):127–140, 1929. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.33.127. [94] Max Born. Zur quantenmechanik der stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik, 37(12):863–867, 1926. doi:10.1007/BF01397477. [95] Georgeanne R. Caughlan and William A. Fowler. Thermonuclear reaction rates v. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 40(2):283–334, 1988. doi:10.1016/0092-640X(88)90009-5. [96] Niels Bohr. The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature, 121:580–590, 1928. [97] David J. Griffiths. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995. [98] John M. Blatt and Victor F. Weisskopf. Theoretical Nuclear Physics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1952. [99] H. A. Bethe. Nuclear physics B. nuclear dynamics, theoretical. Rev. Mod. Phys., 9(2):69– 244, 1937. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.9.69. [100] V. F. Weisskopf. Statistics and nuclear reactions. Phys. Rev., 52(4):295–303, 1937. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.52.295. [101] I. J. Thompson. Coupled-channel methods for nuclear physics. Comput. Phys. Rep., 7(4):167–212, 1988. doi:10.1016/0167-7977(88)90005-6. [102] Meng Wang et al. The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (i). evaluation of input data, and adjustment procedures. Chin. Phys. C, 45(3):030003, 2021. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddb0. [103] Particle Data Group. Review of particle physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022:083C01, 2022. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097. [104] H. A. Bethe and C. L. Critchfield. The formation of deuterons by proton combination. Phys. Rev., 54(10):862–862, 1938. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.862.2. [105] Donald D. Clayton. Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983. [106] E. Margaret Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, William A. Fowler, and F. Hoyle. Syn- thesis of the elements in stars. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29(4):547–650, 1957. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547. [107] Ken Freeman and J. Bland-Hawthorn. The new galaxy: Signatures of its formation. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 40:487–537, 2002. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840. [108] Q. R. Ahmad et al. Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral- current interactions in the sudbury neutrino observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89(1):011301, 2002. arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301. [109] S. Fukuda et al. Solar 8B and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of super- kamiokande data. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(25):5651–5655, 2001. arXiv:hep-ex/0103032, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5651. [110] Philip Morrison, Phylis Morrison, the Office of Charles, and Ray Eames. Powers of Ten: A Book About the Relative Size of Things in the Universe and the Effect of Adding Another Zero. Scientific American Library, New York, 1982. A seminal work based on the famous film, exploring the universe across 40 orders of magnitude. [111] Gerard 't Hooft. In het kielzog van de deeltjes. Contact, Amsterdam, 1984. Translated into English as "In Search of the Ultimate Building Blocks" by Cambridge University Press (1997). This is the original Dutch edition the author encountered. [112] F. Raiola et al. Enhanced electron screening in d(d,p)t for deuterated metals. Eur. Phys. J. A, 13(3):377–382, 2002. doi:10.1140/epja/i2001-10252-6. [113] H. J. Assenbaum, K. Langanke, and C. Rolfs. Effects of electron screening on low-energy fusion cross sections. Z. Phys. A, 327(4):461–468, 1987. doi:10.1007/BF01289572. [114] Henri Becquerel. Sur les radiations émises par phosphorescence. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 122:420–421, 1896. [115] R. W. Gurney and E. U. Condon. Quantum mechanics and radioactive disintegration. Nature, 122(3073):439, 1928. doi:10.1038/122439a0. [116] J. Hans D. Jensen and Maria Goeppert Mayer. Elementary theory of nuclear shell struc- ture. Phys. Rev., 98(5):1476–1476, 1955. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.98.1476. [117] C. A. Bertulani and M. S. Hussein. Tunneling of the quantum decay of the com- pact cold 9be nucleus in the 197au coulomb field. Physical Review C, 103(6):064612, 2021. A modern perspective discussing the limitations of the standard tunneling picture. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.064612. [118] H. A. Bethe and R. F. Bacher. Nuclear physics A. stationary states of nuclei. Reviews of Modern Physics, 8(2):82–229, 1936. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.8.82. [119] A. E. S. Green. The liquid drop model and nuclear moments. Physical Review, 99(3):1016– 1026, 1955. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.99.1016. [120] W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki. Nuclear masses and deformations. Nuclear Physics, 81(1):1–60, 1966. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(66)90639-0. [121] Hans E. Suess. On the interpretation of the magic numbers in the structure of atomic nuclei. Die Naturwissenschaften, 36(6):213–214, 1949. doi:10.1007/BF00590147. [122] Eugene Feenberg and K. C. Hammack. The shell model of the nucleus. Reviews of Modern Physics, 27(1):1–17, 1955. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.27.1. [123] J. Bartel, P. Quentin, M. Brack, C. Guet, and H. B. Håkansson. Towards a better parametrisation of Skyrme-like effective forces: A critical study of the SkM force. Nucl. Phys. A, 386(1):79–100, 1982. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(82)90403-1. [124] G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean. Coupled- cluster computations of atomic nuclei. Rep. Prog. Phys., 77(9):096302, 2014. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302. [125] B. R. Barrett, P. Navrátil, and J. P. Vary. Ab initio no core shell model. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 69:131–181, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.003. [126] Christian Iliadis. Nuclear Physics of Stars. Wiley-VCH, 2007. [127] C. L. Jiang et al. Unexpected behavior of heavy-ion fusion cross sec- tions at extreme sub-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:052701, Jul 2002. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.052701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.052701. [128] C. L. Jiang et al. Systematic examination of the fusion hindrance in heavy element syn- thesis. Eur. Phys. J. A, 55(7):116, 2019. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12798-x. [129] F. Raiola et al. Enhanced electron screening in d(d,p)t for deuterated metals. Eur. Phys. J. A, 13(3):377–382, 2002. doi:10.1140/epja1335-0. [130] J. P. McCarten, R. G. Helmer, C. W. Reich, D. R. Tilley, and H. K. Carter. Nuclear data sheets for A=156. Nucl. Data Sheets, 109(1):1–196, 2008. ENSDF evaluation; 156Gd 2+! → 0+ E2 standard. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2008.01.001. [131] T. Kib'edi, T. W. Burrows, M. B. Trzhaskovskaya, P. M. Davidson, and Jr. C. W. Nestor. Evaluation of theoretical conversion coefficients using bricc. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 589(2):202–229, 2008. BrIcc v2.3 ICC; used for αICC confirmation. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.02.051.