Published November 20, 2025 | Version v1

Nasutixalus microdiscus Boruah & Deepak & Das 2025, nov. comb.

  • 1. Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India
  • 2. Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Natural History Collections, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany & The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, South Kensington, SW 7 5 BD London, United Kingdom & Newcastle University, Newcastle NE 1 7 RU, United Kingdom

Description

Nasutixalus microdiscus (Annandale, 1912) nov. comb.

Chresonymy.

Rhacophorus microdiscus Annandale, 1912: 114.

Rhacophorus (Rhacophorus) microdiscus — Ahl (1931): 57, 121.

Philautus (Kirtixalus) microdiscus — Dubois (1987): 73.

Philautus (Philautus) microdiscus — Bossuyt and Dubois (2001): 40.

Philautus microdiscus — Ahmed et al. (2009): 16.

Comments on taxonomic status.

What is currently known under Philautus microdiscus (Fig. 9) was originally described by Annandale (1912), based on a single specimen (ZSI 16924), as Rhacophorus microdiscus from Kobo in the foothills of Abor (now in Assam; Fig. 1 A). This species has never been reported since its description. Gorham (1974) synonymized this species with Rhacophorus jerdonii (now Nasutixalus jerdonii) but this was not followed by Dubois (1987) and Bossuyt and Dubois (2001). Gorham (1974) was only followed by Sarkar and Ray (2006). Dubois (1987) placed this species in the genus Philautus under the subgenus Kirtixalus. Later, Bossuyt and Dubois (2001) transferred it to the nominotypical subgenus Philautus. However, Garg et al. (2021) questioned the placement of this species in the genus Philautus. Based on molecular data of bush frogs collected from across northeast India, we argue that there are no species of the genus Philautus (sensu stricto) present in this region.

After a review of Annandale’s original description and examination of the holotype (ZSI 16924) we provide the following characters for the holotype: small body size (28.7 mm); presence of vomerine teeth; presence of rudimentary webbing on hand; presence of discs on digits. Annandale (1912) mentioned that the disc on the third finger is less than half of the tympanic diameter, but this may be because the specimen was in a dehydrated state as seen on the sketch provided in the original description); granular abdomen and thighs; subtriangular marking on head; concave stripes on dorsum; crossbars on dorsal surface of limbs (Fig. 9); lateral sides of thighs reddish (based on original description).

The holotype being a small bodied frog (28.7 mm) with a comparatively short rounded snout and discs on the fingers and toes (as with species in Nasutixalus, Philautus, Pseudophilautus, and Raorchestes), from northeast India (as we argue only with Nasutixalus and Raorchestes) with vomerine teeth (absent in Raorchestes) strongly suggests that “ P. microdiscus ” belongs to the genus Nasutixalus Jiang et al., 2016. Species of the genus Nasutixalus (e. g., N. medogensis) are known to occur in the Adi (= Abor) Hills of Arunachal Pradesh (Biju et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2018). During our field surveys over the past five years we recorded several populations of Nasutixalus in the upper reaches of the Adi Hills and throughout the State of Arunachal Pradesh. These recorded specimens partially match Annandale’s description by the following set of characters: dorsally rounded and laterally nearly truncate snout shape, distinct canthus rostralis, presence of vomerine teeth, distinct tympanum, presence of dorsal stripes, presence of dark bar on inter-upper eyelid space, crossbars on limbs, granular belly, discs on fingers, webbing on foot. Thus, we formally transfer Philautus microdiscus to Nasutixalus microdiscus nov. comb. but acknowledge that further studies involving collecting specimens from the type locality or near the type locality of N. microdiscus and including molecular data for phylogenetic comparisons will be necessary to confirm the identity of these records. In addition, the type localities of N. microdiscus and N. medogensis are 90 km apart. Therefore in the light of these new findings, the identity of N. medogensis needs to be verified. Morphometric measurements of holotype of N. microdiscus taken in this study are provided in Table S 11.

Distribution.

In the original description, the type locality was given as “ Kobo, at the base of Abor foothills ”. However, species of the genus Nasutixalus are known to occur above 1000 m elevation, while the elevation of Kobo (present day) is below 150 m a. s. l. (Bossuyt and Dubois 2001). It is possible that the specimens were collected from the hills immediately above Kobo in Adi Hills. Fresh material from the area or DNA from the type specimen will help to resolve the true identity of this species.

Notes

Published as part of Boruah, Bitupan, Deepak, V. & Das, Abhijit, 2025, Revision of bush frogs, Raorchestes and Philautus (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the northeast Indian biodiversity hotspot with description of thirteen new species, pp. 517-625 in Vertebrate Zoology 75 on pages 517-625, DOI: 10.3897/vz.75.e148133

Files

Files (5.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4e4b4589215fec8c38cbe0e12362c51f
5.1 kB Download

System files (30.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1ded7fc9e950c6bfb91bfe71c18d64a1
30.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Boruah & Deepak & Das
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Anura
Family
Rhacophoridae
Genus
Nasutixalus
Species
microdiscus
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic status
comb. nov.
Taxonomic concept label
Nasutixalus microdiscus (Annandale, 1912) sec. Boruah, Deepak & Das, 2025

References

  • Annandale N (1912) Zoological results of the Abor expedition, 1911 - 1912. I. Batrachia. Records of the Indian Museum 8: 7-36.
  • Ahl E (1931) Amphibia: Anura III (Polypedatidae). Das Tierreich 55: 1–477.
  • Dubois A (1987) Miscellanea taxinomica batrachologica (II). Alytes 6: 1–9.
  • Bossuyt F, Dubois A (2001) A review of the frog genus Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae, Rhacophorinae). Zeylanica 6: 1–112.
  • Ahmed MF, Das A, Dutta SK (2009) Amphibians and Reptiles of Northeast India: A Photographic Guide. Aaranyak, Guwahati, 170 pp.
  • Annandale N (1912) Zoological results of the Abor expedition, 1911–1912. I. Batrachia. Records of the Indian Museum 8: 7–36.
  • Gorham SW (1974) Checklist of World Amphibians up to January 1, 1970. New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, 173 pp.
  • Sarkar AK, Ray S (2006) Amphibia. In: Alfred JRB (Ed.) Fauna of Arunachal Pradesh, State Fauna Series 13 (Part I). Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 285–316.
  • Garg S, Suyesh R, Das S, Bee MA, Biju SD (2021) An integrative approach to infer systematic relationships and define species groups in the shrub frog genus Raorchestes, with description of five new species from the Western Ghats, India. PeerJ 9: e 10791. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10791
  • Jiang K, Yan F, Wang K, Zou DH, Li C, Che J (2016) A new genus and species of treefrog from Medog, southeastern Tibet, China (Anura, Rhacophoridae). Zoological Research 37: 15–20.
  • Biju SD, Senevirathne G, Garg S, Mahony S, Kamei RG, Thomas A, Shouche Y, Raxworthy CJ, Meegaskumbura M, Bocxlaer IV (2016) Frankixalus, a new rhacophorid genus of tree hole breeding frogs with oophagous tadpoles. PloS One 11: e 0145727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145727
  • Yang JH, Chan BPL (2018) A new phytotelm-breeding treefrog of the genus Nasutixalus (Rhacophoridae) from western Yunnan of China. Zootaxa 4388: 191-206. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4388.2.3