Published February 24, 2025 | Version v1
Publication Open

Association between electronic cigarette use and respiratory outcomes among people with no established smoking history: a comprehensive review and critical appraisal

  • 1. Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico San Marco

Description

Nicotine consumption in many countries is shifting away from combustible cigarettes and toward electronic cigarettes (ECs). Understanding the overall population-level impact requires weighing their possible benefits (e.g., for smoking cessation/switching) vs harms (e.g., long-term health risks). However, current evidence on health risks is limited by the absence of long-term data and confounding by prior cigarette smoking history. Focusing on short- to medium-term respiratory outcomes associated with EC use among people who never smoked (PWNS) is informative. We perform a narrative review and critical appraisal of studies examining the prospective association between exclusive EC use and respiratory outcomes among PWNS (either true never-smoking or never-established smoking). We included 12 studies with prospective designs that examine a range of respiratory outcomes subsequent to EC use among PWNS. Eight studies did not find statistically significant differences in respiratory risk associated with baseline EC use. The remaining five studies reported a significant association in at least one analysis, but in four of these studies, associations were not robust across models. Limitations included overreliance on data from the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health, uncertain directionality (i.e., pre-existing respiratory conditions were not always ruled out), confounding by other combustible tobacco use, and small sample sizes. All but one study lacked clear and statistically significant evidence of self-reported respiratory diagnoses associated with EC use among PWNS, or showed a tenuous association with mild respiratory symptoms. This has favorable implications for ECs’ population health impact; however, small sample sizes and statistical biases limit this evidence. A formal systematic review on this topic is forthcoming.

Notes

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Catania within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The author(s) received no financial support for this article with the exception of the contribution from Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine at the University of Catania to cover publication fees (UPB 6C725202048/2024).

Files

s11739-025-03894-7.pdf

Files (807.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c15049fa0a17c741071bfa63f9949e38
807.2 kB Preview Download