Published November 18, 2025 | Version v1
Report Open

Report on new methods for the chemical testing of capture solvents including purity, stability and CO2 uptake to support European industries in understanding the degradation and purity of CO2 and key impurities and ensuring efficient operation and utilisation of CO2

  • 1. ROR icon National Physical Laboratory
  • 1. ROR icon National Physical Laboratory

Description

Note:

 This report will describe a method to  quantify the CO2 capture efficiency of solid sorbents with CaO as a benchmark sorbent under post combustion capture conditions. Traceable primary reference gas mixtures were used in these experiments to ensure that the quantification was accurate. The effect of impurities and amount of CO2 in the flue gas was assessed by varying the composition of the PRMs used for the tests. An uncertainty budget was developed to include all uncertainties involved in the measured using GUM. The initial objective of the activity to test solvents was not tested as the rig available to do the testing could not handle any solvents. Therefore, a change request was placed and approved to test solid sorbents for quantifying carbonation efficiency.  The deliverable was successfully achieved for testing carbonation efficiency of solid sorbents.

Files

MetCCUS_D6_Report on new methods for the chemical testing of capture solvents including purity, stability and CO2 uptake.pdf

Additional details

Funding

European Association of National Metrology Institutes

References

  • 1. CCUS in clean energy transitions, Energy Technology Prospectives, 2020.
  • J. D. Figueroa, T. Fout, S. Plasynski, H. McIlvried and R. D. Srivastava, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, 2, 9–20.
  • 3. Krödel, M. et al. (2020) 'Mechanistic understanding of CaO‐based sorbents for high‐Temperature Co2 Capture: Advanced Characterization and Prospects', ChemSusChem, 13(23), pp. 6259–6272. doi:10.1002/cssc.202002078.
  • 4. Nityashree, N. et al. (2020) 'Advanced high-temperature co2 sorbents with improved long-term cycling stability', ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12(30), pp. 33765–33774. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c08652
  • 5. ISO, Gas analysis — Preparation of calibration gas mixtures — Gravimetric method for Class I mixtures, ISO, Geneva, 2015.
  • 6. https://www.hidenanalytical.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/HPR-20-RD-2021-.pdf
  • 7. https://www.parrinst.com/products/stirred-reactors/series-5500-hp-compact-reactors/
  • 8. P. Jackson and M. I. Attalla, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2010, 24, 3567–3577.
  • 9. P. A. Chandan, J. E. Remias, J. K. Neathery and K. Liu, Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47, 5481–5487.
  • 10. Hiden Analytical, Gas Analysis, Application Note 282, Relative Sensitivity measurements. Picture tag text
  • 11. P. N. Magee, Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 1971, 9, 207–218.
  • 12. A. A. A. Solieman, J. W. Dijkstra, W. G. Haije, P. Cobden, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 2009, 3, 393–400. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.02.002.
  • 13. J. I. Huertas, M. D. Gomez, N. Giraldo and J. Garzón, Journal of Chemistry, 2015, 2015, 1–7.
  • 14. S. Rinprasertmeechai, S. Chavadej, P. Rangsunvigit, and S. Kulprathipanja, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 2012, 6, 362–366.