EVALUATING THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON CANDIDATES' PERFORMANCE IN ORDINARY LEVEL MATHEMATICS AT THE GENERAL CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION EXAMINATION IN CAMEROON

The study explored the assessment processes and its implications on candidates’ performance in Mathematics Ordinary level at the General Certificate of Education examination in the South west region of Cameroon. This study adopted an exploratory design and examined a collection of the mathematics GCE O level national examinations, in particular, the cognitive demands of the examinations made on students. The instrument used to examine the cognitive demands of the test items in this study was an adaptation from the model of Smith et al – the MATH taxonomy, as the descriptors in this model matched with the assessment objectives of the ordinary level mathematics syllabus 570. The instrument included six categories of mathematical knowledge and skills, arranged into three groups A, B, and C, in the MATH taxonomy, assessing students’ mathematical understanding. The five assessment objectives for O-level mathematics stated in the GCE Mathematics Ordinary Level Syllabus 570 document were matched with the six categories of cognitive demands in the derived set of assessment standards. The two researchers did the matching independently and afterwards compared their results and differences which they reconciled to come to a common consensus. It was found that all mathematics GCE O-level examinations, analysed in this study were heavily biased towards assessing knowledge and skills in Group A category, with almost 50% or more of the items focusing on (A3) Routine Procedures and 18 - 30% on (A2) Comprehension, though only 9.4% on (A1) Factual Knowledge in the GCE O-level assessments Examination. It was recommended that enough attention should be directed to developing a more balanced assessment that not only includes items that assess the various categories of cognitive demands but also assesses all dimensions of understanding in the different topics.