Published November 15, 2025 | Version v1
Preprint Open

One Bit at Every Scale: A Cross- Disciplinary Analysis of Uncertainty Transitions

Authors/Creators

Description

Many physical, biological, and computational systems can be described as transitioning from a probability distribution to a realized state. Using Shannon’s definition of entropy, this paper quantifies the informational content of such transitions across four domains: quantum physics, cosmology, large language models (LLMs), and neural systems. For each domain, we identify a representative elementary transition, derive or extract the relevant probability distribution, and compute its entropy in bits. Across spin measurements, tunneling measurement outcomes, inflationary modes, black-hole area elements, next-token distributions in transformer models, EEG microstates, MEG phase states, and decision-related neural activity, the entropy of an elementary transition consistently falls within a narrow range of approximately one to two bits.

The comparison distinguishes between transitions whose distributions are directly measurable (quantum experiments, cosmological spectra, electrophysiological data) and transitions whose distributions are effective or inferred (internal gating events in LLMs). The resulting numerical regularity therefore reflects similarities in probabilistic structure rather than shared physical mechanisms.

While these systems differ fundamentally in scale and substrate, the convergence in informational scale is empirically robust across independently motivated definitions. Whether this pattern reflects deeper physical constraints or methodological commonalities remains an open question warranting further investigation.

This descriptive informational comparison provides a quantitative reference for cross-domain analysis. Future work may explore whether the informational scale of state transitions supports methodological transfer between fields or reveals deeper structural constraints on how systems reduce uncertainty.

Files

one-bit-at-every-scale_v4.pdf

Files (397.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5c01f2220fbcf80c0822d26b90d7c176
397.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Created
2025-11-15

References

  • 't Hooft, G. (1993). Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. arXiv:gr-qc/9310026.
  • Aharonov, Y., & Vaidman, L. (1991). Complete description of a quantum system at a given time. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 24(10), 2315–2328.
  • Baker, A. P., Brookes, M. J., Rezek, I. A., et al. (2014). Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity. eLife, 3, e01867.
  • Baumann, D. (2009). TASI Lectures on Inflation. arXiv:0907.5424.
  • Bekenstein, J. D. (1973). Black holes and entropy. Physical Review D, 7(8), 2333–2346.
  • Brunton, B. W., Botvinick, M. M., & Brody, C. D. (2013). Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making. Science, 340(6128), 95–98.
  • Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2006). Elements of information theory (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185.
  • Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts. Viking / Penguin.
  • Elhage, N., Nanda, N., Olsson, C., et al. (2021). A mathematical framework for transformer circuits. Anthropic.
  • Gamow, G. (1928). Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes. Zeitschrift für Physik, 51, 204–212.
  • Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 535–574.
  • Hanks, T. D., Kopec, C. D., Brunton, B. W., et al. (2015). Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation. Nature, 520(7546), 220–223.
  • Hawking, S. W. (1975). Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 43(3), 199–220.
  • Hendrycks, D., & Gimpel, K. (2016). Gaussian error linear units (GELUs). arXiv:1606.08415.
  • Holevo, A. S. (1973). Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel. Problems of Information Transmission, 9(3), 177–183.
  • Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M., & Choi, Y. (2020). The curious case of neural text degeneration. ICLR.
  • Huang, K. (1987). Statistical mechanics (2nd ed.). Wiley.
  • Ising, E. (1925). Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik, 31(1), 253–258.
  • Koenig, T., Prichep, L., Lehmann, D., et al. (2002). Millisecond by millisecond, year by year: normative EEG microstates and developmental stages. NeuroImage, 16(1), 41–48.
  • Liddle, A. R., & Lyth, D. H. (2000). Cosmological inflation and large-scale structure. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ma, X.-S., Kofler, J., Qarry, H., et al. (2012). Experimental delayed-choice entanglement swapping. Nature Physics, 8, 479–484.
  • MacKay, D. J. C. (2003). Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
  • Meister, C., Vieira, T., & Cotterell, R. (2020). If beam search is the answer, what was the question? EMNLP, 2173–2185.
  • Merzbacher, E. (1998). Quantum mechanics (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • Michel, C. M., & Koenig, T. (2018). EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks. NeuroImage, 180, 577–593.
  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
  • Mukhanov, V. F., Feldman, H. A., & Brandenberger, R. H. (1992). Theory of cosmological perturbations. Physics Reports, 215(5–6), 203–333.
  • Nair, V., & Hinton, G. E. (2010). Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. ICML, 807–814.
  • Nanda, N., & Chan, L. (2023). Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretability. arXiv:2301.05217.
  • Newman, M. E. J., & Barkema, G. T. (1999). Monte Carlo methods in statistical physics. Oxford University Press.
  • Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2010). Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Neill, G. C., Tewarie, P. K., Vidaurre, D., et al. (2018). Dynamics of large-scale electrophysiological networks: A technical review. NeuroImage, 180, 559–576.
  • Olah, C., Cammarata, N., Schubert, L., Goh, G., Petrov, M., & Carter, S. (2020). Zoom In: An Introduction to Circuits. Distill, 5(3), e00024.001.
  • Page, D. N. (1976a). Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole. Physical Review D, 13(2), 198–206.
  • Page, D. N. (1976b). Particle emission rates from a black hole. II. Massless particles from a rotating hole. Physical Review D, 14(12), 3260-3273.
  • Planck Collaboration. (2018). Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A1.
  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.
  • Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9(5), 347–356.
  • Sakurai, J. J., & Napolitano, J. (2017). Modern quantum mechanics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423; 27(4), 623–656.
  • Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Tishby, N. (2017). Opening the black box of deep neural networks via information. arXiv:1703.00810.
  • Susskind, L. (1995). The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11), 6377–6396.
  • Tishby, N., & Zaslavsky, N. (2015). Deep learning and the information bottleneck. 2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW), 1–5.
  • Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. NeurIPS, 5998–6008.
  • Vidaurre, D., et al. (2017). Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time. PNAS, 114(52), 12827-12832.
  • Vidaurre, D., Hunt, L. T., Quinn, A. J., et al. (2016). Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data. NeuroImage, 126, 81–95.
  • Vul, E., Goodman, N., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014). One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples. Cognitive Science, 38(4), 599–637.
  • Yeomans, J. M. (1992). Statistical mechanics of phase transitions. Oxford University Press.
  • Zanesco, A. P., King, B. G., Maclean, K. A., & Saron, C. D. (2020). Within and between-person correlates of resting-state EEG microstates. NeuroImage, 211, 116631.