Evolutionary Predicament of Human Societal Governance and the Feasibility of Non-Anthropomorphic Computational Systems as a Sustainable Trajectory

DISCLAIMER AND STATEMENT OF ANALYTICAL SCOPE

This paper, titled "Evolutionary Predicament of Human Societal Governance and the Feasibility of Non-Anthropomorphic Computational Systems as a Sustainable Trajectory," presents a formal analysis grounded in system dynamics, evolutionary game theory, and computational complexity.

1.      Objective and Value-Neutrality: The conclusions presented regarding the long-term convergence of the Global Civilization System (GCS) and Global Social System (GSS) toward "Self-Destruction" or "Eternal Totalitarianism" are derived purely from an analysis of the structural, mathematical, and evolutionary constraints inherent in high-complexity, multi-agent systems with exponential technological growth and sub-exponential coordination capacity. This study is conducted with strict value-neutrality. It is an engineering assessment of systemic fragility, not a moral judgment, political manifesto, or ideological argument.

2.      Scope of Analysis (Prediction vs. Prescription): The identification of the two terminal states—the Self-Destruction probability attractor and the Global Stability Trap (Eternal Totalitarianism) attractor—is intended for the sole purpose of theoretical modeling, academic discourse, and risk mitigation in long-term governance strategy. This paper does not endorse, advocate for, or call for the establishment of any specific political system. Its findings should not be interpreted as a justification for any particular political action or ideology.

3.      Warning Against Misinterpretation: The authors explicitly warn against the misinterpretation or weaponization of these findings for political discourse or policy advocacy. The analysis focuses on systemic inevitability under current, non-remediated parameters, which is meant to inform the urgent search for a paradigm shift in global governance, not to despair over present conditions or to provide a philosophical basis for fatalism. The responsibility for addressing and avoiding these predicted systemic failures remains with global political actors and civil society.