Published November 14, 2025 | Version v1

Analysis of excitation functions for alpha particle-induced reactions on stable copper and antimony isotopes up to 80 MeV energy region

  • 1. Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
  • 2. University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Description

This study applies the COMPLET nuclear reaction code to calculate excitation functions for eleven alpha-induced reactions on stable copper (63Cu, 65Cu) and antimony (121Sb, 123Sb) isotopes, aiming to predict production cross-sections for medically significant radionuclides such as 68Ga, 67Ga, 66Ga, 65Zn, 124I, and 123I. Reactions are simulated across an alpha energy range of 10–80 MeV to evaluate excitation functions. Fixed nuclear model parameters, such as an initial exciton number n0 = 4 (2p+2n+0h) and level density parameters ACN/K (K = 10) expressions tied to compound nucleus mass, were used to compute theoretical cross-sections. Model outputs were systematically compared with experimental data obtained from the EXFOR database. Statistical and graphical analyses demonstrated an excellent agreement, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.74 to 0.94. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that variations in exciton numbers and level density parameters significantly influenced the shape and peak positions of the excitation functions, highlighting the importance of accurate parameter selection. These findings validate the COMPLET code as a reliable tool for modeling alpha-induced nuclear reactions, especially when experimental data are scarce. The results contribute to improved nuclear data evaluations and provide critical support for the planning of radionuclide production in medical applications. The study also includes a detailed covariance analysis to minimize discrepancies between model predictions and experimental data, emphasizing the importance of theoretical methods in contemporary nuclear research.

Files

NUCET_article_155986.pdf

Files (876.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a31f2d52a16a88a5927a195867fae506
757.4 kB Preview Download
md5:585e1daba987f208c62faf4a0891b3d7
118.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Akkoyun S, Bayram T, Kara SO (2015) Photonuclear reaction cross sections for gallium isotopes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 590: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/590/1/012047
  • Alhassid Y (2021) 254 Springer Proceedings in Physics Nuclear Level Densities: From Empirical Models to Microscopic Methods, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58082-7_12
  • Artun O, Aytekin H (2017) Investigation of excitation functions of proton-induced reactions on 94; 96; 98; 100Mo targets for production of radioisotopes 94m; 94g; 96m; 96g; 96; 99mTc. Turkish Journal of Physics 41: 295–302. https://doi.org/10.3906/fiz-1612-2
  • Asres YH, Mathuthu M, Birhane MD (2018) Analysis of reaction cross-section production in neutron induced fission reactions on uranium isotope using computer code COMPLET. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 139: 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.04.025
  • Asres YH, Mathuthu M, Ferede YA (2019) Investigation of nuclear reaction mechanisms of nickel isotopes at various energies induced by alpha particles. Journal of Physics Communications 3: 115018. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/ab589f
  • Aydin A, S-arer B, Tel E (2007) New calculation of excitation functions of proton-induced reactions in some medical isotopes of Cu, Zn and Ga, Applied Radiation and Isotopes 65: 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.10.006
  • Baak M, Koopman R, Snoek H, Klous S (2020) A new correlation coefficient between categorical, ordinal and interval variables with Pearson characteristics. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 152: 107043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2020.107043
  • Bhardwaj MK iar and AKC (1994) Alpha-Induced Reactions in Antimony. International journal of Modern Physics E 3: 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301394000103
  • Blann M, Vonach HK (1983) Global test of modified precompound decay models. Physical Review C 28: 1475–1492. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1475
  • Bonesso O, Ozafran MJ, Mosca HO, Vazquez ME, Capurro OA, Nassiff SJ (1991) Study of pre-equilibrium effects on α-induced reactions on copper. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Articles 152: 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042152
  • Braghirolli AMS, Waissmann W, Da Silva JB, Dos Santos GR (2014) Production of iodine-124 and its applications in nuclear medicine. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 90: 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.03.026
  • Bryant EA, Cochran DRF, Knight JD (1963) Excitation functions of reactions of 7- to 24-MeV He³ ions with Cu-63 and Cu-65. Physical Review 130(4): 1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.1375
  • Cascini GL, Niccoli Asabella A, Notaristefano A, Restuccia A, Ferrari C, Rubini D, Altini C, Rubini G (2014) 124Iodine: A longer-life positron emitter isotope - New opportunities in molecular imaging. BioMed Research International 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/672094
  • Cherie Sisay M, Teshagre Aklie M (2023) Pre-equilibrium Effects on Alpha Particle Induced Reactions on Niobium Isotope from Threshold upto 100MeV using the Computer Code COMPLET. International Journal of Physics Research and Applications 6: 180–184. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.ijpra.1001069
  • Degu Belete G, Asres YH, Zegeye SM, Alemu YE (2024) Analysis of the excitation function of deuteron induced nuclear reaction on Neon-20 using COMPLET code. Nuclear Energy and Technology 10: 259–265. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.10.135254
  • Dupont E, Koning AJ, Otuka N (2011) Exploratory data analysis of the EXFOR database. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 59: 1333–1336. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.59.1333
  • Ejerso AB, Etefa HF, Dejene FB (2023) Excitation function of neutron induced reaction on isotopes of cadmium (106Cd, 108Cd &110Cd) in the energy range of 13–15 MeV. International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology 5: 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jandt.2023.12.001
  • Elmaghraby EK (2008) Initial exciton configuration in (p,n) pre-equilibrium emission reactions. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics 78: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014601
  • Escher JE, Burke JT, Dietrich FS, Scielzo ND, Thompson IJ, Younes W (2012) Compound-nuclear reaction cross sections from surrogate measurements. Reviews of Modern Physics 84: 353–397. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.353
  • Furutachi N, Minato F, Iwamoto O (2019) Phenomenological level density model with hybrid parameterization of deformed and spherical state densities. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 56: 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2019.1588801
  • Green MA (1991) Gallium and Copper Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, Purdue University, A.M. Emran. Plenum Press. New York, 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0626-7_14
  • Hassan KF, Qaim SM, Saleh ZA, Coenen HH (2006) Alpha-particle induced reactions on natsb and 121sb with particular reference to the production of the medically interesting radionuclide 124i. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 64: 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.07.007
  • Hermanne A, Adam Rebeles R, Tárkányi F, Takács S (2015) Alpha particle induced reactions on natCr up to 39 MeV: Experimental cross-sections, comparison with theoretical calculations and thick target yields for medically relevant 52gFe production. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 356–357: 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.04.025
  • Hilaire S, Bauge E, Huu-Tai PC, Dupuis M, Péru S, Roig O, Romain P, Goriely S (2018) Potential sources of uncertainties in nuclear reaction modeling. EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies 4: 16. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018014
  • Hodgson PE, Field GM, Gruppelaar H, Nagel P (1986) Pre-equilibrium processes in nuclear reactions. Radiation Effects 95: 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00337578608208667
  • IAEA Nuclear Data Section (1994) Nuclear data services. IAEA-NDS Documentation Series. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
  • Ismail M (1990) Measurement and analysis of the excitation function for alpha-induced reactions on Ga and Sb isotopes. Physical Review C 41: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.41.87
  • Jalilian AR, Rowshanfarzad P, Sabet M, Rahiminejad-Kisomi A, Rajamand AA (2006) Development of [66Ga]oxine complex; a possible PET tracer. Nukleonika 51: 155–159.
  • Jalilian AR, Beiki D, Hassanzadeh-Rad A, Eftekhari A, Geramifar P, Eftekhari M (2016) Production and clinical applications of radiopharmaceuticals and medical radioisotopes in Iran. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 46: 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.01.006
  • Karpuz Demir N, Çetin B, Akkurt I, Noori SS (2017) Calculations of double differential cross sections on 56Fe, 63Cu and 90Zr neutron emission in proton induced reactions. Acta Physica Polonica A 132: 1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.1181
  • Kolos K, Sobes V, Vogt R, Romano CE, Smith MS, Bernstein LA, Brown DA, Burkey MT, Danon Y, Elsawi MA, Goldblum BL, Heilbronn LH, Hogle SL, Hutchinson J, Loer B, McCutchan EA, Mumpower MR, O'Brien EM, Percher C, Peplowski PN, Ressler JJ, Schunck N, Thompson NW, Voyles AS, Wieselquist W, Zerkle M (2022) Current nuclear data needs for applications. Physical Review Research 4: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.021001
  • Korkulu Z, Özkan N et al. (2018) Investigation of α -induced reactions on Sb isotopes relevant to the astrophysical γ process. Physical Review C 97: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.045803
  • Leonte RA, Cocioabǎ D, Chilug LE, Bǎruţǎ SI, Eşanu TR, Burghelea B, Chiriacescu A, Crǎciun LS, Niculae D (2020) Process validation for production of copper radioisotopes in a TR-19 variable energy cyclotron. AIP Conference Proceedings 2295: 020022. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0031538
  • Levkovskii VN, Reutov VF, Botvin KV (1984) Helium accumulation in molybdenum irradiated by protons in the 15–30 mev energy region. Radiation Effects 80: 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00337578408216465
  • Mekonen CS, Rao AVM (2023) Analysis of Proton Induced Reactions on Yttrium Isotope Using Computer Code COMPLET. International Journal of High Energy Physics 10(2): 22–26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhep.20231002.12
  • Mekonen CS, Rao AVM, Dessie YA (2025) Dataset underpinning analysis of excitation functions of alpha particle induced reactions on stable copper and antimony isotopes up to 80 MeV energy region [Data set]. Zenodo. Nuclear Energy and Technology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17202575 (version 1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17202576)
  • Morrison DL, Porile NT (1959) Absence of isomerism in gallium-65. Physical Review 113: 289–290. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.113.289
  • Najm SA, Salloum AD (2025) Effect of Exciton Number on One-Component and Two-Component Partial Level Density Formulae. Baghdad Science Journal 22: 170–176. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2024.9267
  • Navin A, Tripathi V, Blumenfeld Y, Nanal V, Simenel C, Casandjian JM, de France G, Raabe R, Bazin D, Chatterjee A, Dasgupta M, Kailas S, Lemmon RC, Mahata K, Pillay RG, Pollacco EC, Ramachandran K, Rejmund M, Shrivastava A, Sida JL, Tryggestad E (2004) Direct and compound reactions induced by unstable helium beams near the Coulomb barrier. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics 70: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044601
  • Noori S (2025) Optimizing 66Ga Yields: Evaluating Production Routes via Proton, 3He and Alpha particles Bombardment of Copper and Zinc Isotopes. Kirkuk Journal of Science 20: 23–34. https://doi.org/10.32894/kujss.2025.156644.1192
  • Otuka N, Dupont E, Semkova V, Pritychenko B, Blokhin AI, Aikawa M, Babykina S, Bossant M, Chen G, Dunaeva S, Forrest RA, Fukahori T, Furutachi N, Ganesan S, Ge Z, Gritzay OO, Herman M, Hlavač S, Katō K, Lalremruata B, Zhuang Y (2014) Towards a More complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR): International collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC). Nuclear Data Sheets 120: 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.065
  • Porile NT, Morrison DL (1959) Reactions of Cu-63 and Cu-65 with alpha particles. Physical Review 116(5): 1362–1365. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.1362
  • Pneumaticos SG, Chatziioannou SN, Moore WH, Johnson M (2001) The role of radionuclides in primary musculoskeletal tumors beyond the "bone scan. " Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 37: 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(00)00106-2
  • Pritychenko B (2023) 75 Years of Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Compilations. EPJ Web of Conferences 284: 14002. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328414002
  • Qaim SM (2017) Nuclear data for production and medical application of radionuclides: Present status and future needs. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 44: 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.08.016
  • Qaim SM, Hussain M, Spahn I, Neumaier B (2021) Continuing Nuclear Data Research for Production of Accelerator-Based Novel Radionuclides for Medical Use: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Physics 9: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.639290
  • Rao AVM, Mukherjee S, Rao JR (1991) Alpha particle induced reactions on copper and tantalum. Pramana Journal of Physics 36: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846495
  • Resongles E, Freydier R, Casiot C, Viers J, Chmeleff J, Elbaz-Poulichet F (2015) Antimony isotopic composition in river waters affected by ancient mining activity. Talanta 144: 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.013
  • Rizvi IA, Ansari MA, Chaubey AK, Gautam RP, Singh RKY, Gautam RP, Singh RKY (1987) Excitation Function Studies of (α, xpyn) Reactions for 63, 65Cu and Pre-Equilibrium Effect. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 56: 3135–3144. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.56.3135
  • Sabet M, Rowshanfarzad P, Jalilian AR, Ensaf MR, Rajamand AA (2006) Production and quality control of66Ga radionuclide. Nukleonika 51: 147–154.
  • Schwerer O, Obložinský P (2001) Overview of nuclear data libraries and online services. Radiochimica Acta 89: 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2001.89.4-5.197
  • Schwerer O, DEFRA , Suchopár M, ei.al. (2003) Production of 55 Co via the 54 Fe (d , n) -process and excitation functions of 54 Fe (d , t) 53 Fe and 54 Fe (d , α) 52m Mn reactions from threshold. Guidance Document 108: 105–108. www.defra.gov.uk%5Cnwww.defra.gov.uk/environment/policy/permits
  • Semkova V, Pritychenko B (2014) Summary Report of the Workshop on The Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Database. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/1174124
  • Singh BP, Bhardwaj' ARPHD (1991) A study of pre-equilibrium emission in a-induced reactions on 1217'23. Canadian Journal of Physics 69: 1–23.
  • Singh BP, Sharma MK, Musthafa MM, Bhardwaj HD, Prasad R (2006) A study of pre-equilibrium emission in some proton- and alpha-induced reactions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 562: 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.02.030
  • Singh NL, Patel BJ, Somayajulu DRS, Chintalapudi SN (1994) Analysis of the excitation functions of (α, xnyp) reactions on natural copper. Pramana Journal of Physics 42(4): 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02847306
  • Szelecsényi F, Kovács Z, Nagatsu K, Fukumura K, Suzuki K, Mukai K (2012) Investigation of direct production of 68Ga with low energy multiparticle accelerator. Radiochimica Acta 100: 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2011.1896
  • Tel E, Aydin A, Kaplan A, Şarer B (2008) New calculation method for initial exciton numbers on nucleon induced pre-equilibrium reactions. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics 77: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.054605
  • Tiguaded Y, Amanuel FK (2024) Theoretical model predictions for production of medically used radionuclides on alpha induced reactions with Cobalt-59 at energies of 25–172 MeV. East African Journal of Biophysical and Computational Sciences 5(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4314/eajbcs.v5i1.1S
  • Uddin MS, Scholten B (2016) Excitation functions of alpha particle induced reactions on natTi up to 40 MeV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 380: 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2016.05.005
  • Uddin MS, Scholten B, Hermanne A, Sudár S, Coenen HH, Qaim SM (2010) Radiochemical determination of cross sections of α-particle induced reactions on 192Os for the production of the therapeutic radionuclide 193mPt. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 68: 2001–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.05.002
  • Weisskopf VF, Ewing DH (1940) On the yield of nuclear reactions with heavy elements. Physical Review 57: 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.57.472
  • Wen B, Zhou J, Zhou A, Liu C, Li L (2018) A review of antimony (Sb) isotopes analytical methods and application in environmental systems. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 128: 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.008
  • Yiğit M (2018) Analysis of (n,p) cross sections near 14 MeV. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 135: 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.01.029
  • Yiǧit M, Tel E (2014) Nuclear model calculation for production of 18F, 22Na, 44,46Sc, 54Mn, 64Cu, 68Ga, 76Br and 90Y radionuclides used in medical applications. Annals of Nuclear Energy 69: 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.01.036
  • Zerkin V V., Pritychenko B (2018) The experimental nuclear reaction data (EXFOR): Extended computer database and Web retrieval system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 888: 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.045
  • Zweit J, Sharma H, Downey S (1987) Production of gallium-66, a short-lived, positron emitting radionuclide. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part 38: 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-2889(87)90194-8