Published November 14, 2025 | Version v1
Poster Open

Internal Load Characterization of a Surfing Session: a Case Study

  • 1. Santarém Polytechnic University, School of Sport, Av. Dr. Mário Soares, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal
  • 2. Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, R. Marquês de Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal
  • 3. Research Center in Sport Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Santarém Polytechnic University, Av. Dr. Mário Soares, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal

Description

The activity profile in surfing has been studied by using time-motion analysis, which is a reliable method that uses detailed analysis of video recordings, along with the characterization of the internal load through heart rate (HR). The aim of this study is to characterize the activity profile of a surfing session. A surfing session, lasting 45 minutes, was filmed with a Portuguese athlete (73kg, 1.84m) who has competed at national level in which HR was recorded with a Polar optical HR sensor (“Polar Verity Sense”), placed around the arm on the exterior part, following manufacturer guidelines. Session HR, using the average, maximum and minimum values and percentages of time were used for analysis. Session HR values were: average 116bpm; maximum 138bpm and minimum 91bpm. During the session, the following HR values (average, maximum, minimum, respectively) were found for specific activities: “paddling to return to the lineup” – 116, 135, 91 bpm; “sprint paddle for the wave” – 118, 132, 106 bpm; “general paddle in the lineup” – 118, 138, 93 bpm; “stationary” – 136, 137, 91 bpm; “wave riding” – 115, 128, 106 bpm; “recovery of the surfboard” – 115, 122, 107 bpm. In conclusion, the top three activities in which the surfer spent more time were “paddling to return to the lineup” (19.53%), “general paddle in the lineup” (27,15%) and “stationary” (45,63%). For future studies, using a Global Positioning System and other physiological tests to determine HR intensity zones could provide a better understanding of the surfing modality and the training process to be adopted.

Files

Poster_Internal Load Characterization of a Surfing Session a Case Study.pdf

Additional details

References

  • Barlow, M. J., Gresty, K., Findlay, M., Cooke, C. B., & Davidson, M. A. (2014). The Effect of Wave Conditions and Surfer Ability on Performance and the Physiological Response of Recreational Surfers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(10), 2946–2953. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000491
  • Farley, O. R. L., Abbiss, C. R., & Sheppard, J. M. (2017). Performance Analysis of Surfing: A Review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(1), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001442
  • Farley, O. R. L., Harris, N. K., & Kilding, A. E. (2012). Physiological Demands of Competitive Surfing. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(7), 1887–1896. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392c4b
  • International Surfing Association. (2024, September 20). Who we are: About the International Surfing Association. https://isasurf.org/about-isa/
  • Meir, R., Lowdon, B. J., & Davie, A. (1991). Heart rates and estimated energy expenditure during recreational surfing. The Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.
  • Secomb, J. L., Sheppard, J. M., & Dascombe, B. J. (2015). Time–Motion Analysis of a 2-Hour Surfing Training Session. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 10(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0002