Materiality of Memorialization: Mapping Migrant Women's Landmarks in Europe
- 1. Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
- 2. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- 3. Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
- 4. Universidade Lusófona, Lisbon, Portugal
- 5. Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
- 6. University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain
- 7. Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning, Bucharest, Romania
- 8. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 9. University of Turku, Pori, Finland
- 10. Centre de Documentation sur les Migrations Humaines, Dudelange, Luxembourg
- 11. Institute of Political History, Budapest, Hungary
- 12. University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- 13. Institute of National History, Skopje, North Macedonia
- 14. Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
Description
This article investigates the memorialization of migrant women across transcultural landscapes, and analyses results from the Register of Migrant Women Landmarks in Europe (hereinafter RMWLE), central to the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action project "Women on the Move" (CA19112 – WEMov). It serves as reference for subsequent research based on data from this Register, for which data collection is continuing. The RMWLE registers landmarks, such as monuments, plaques, streets and other toponymic infrastructures named after women with a significant history of migration. It honours aspects rarely prioritized in memorialization agendas, which are skewed towards men's stories, and towards the more linear biographies of sedentary figures whose European, national, and regional memorialization have remained uncomplicated by migration. This Deep Data study reveals recurring patterns at the level of Europe in the memorialization of these women migrants. The diversity of stories, the richness and the prominence of landmarks devoted to men compared to women is a subject well-covered in memorialization studies. This unbalance is compounded by the data from our register which shows landmarks on women migrants that are sometime tokenized, often marginalized, and which reproduce the bias towards nurture and care that have besieged the memorialization of women in general. It further shows that the memorialization process and the political and cultural mechanisms of official commemoration often work against the recognition of cross-border careers and stories. The intersectionality of the project, highlighting both gender and migration, uncovers a political landscape of landmarks – and we reflect on how this register can help combat cultural prejudice by recovering migration episodes. The RMWLE helps us reflect on the defining impact of migration episodes, a reality rarely underlined in the biographies of famous women. This article is based on a quantitative content analysis, focused on identifying measurable features and frequencies within the RMLWE dataset, and combines it with a storytelling approach at the interpretation stage, to counter dominant cultural narratives and knowledge practices.
This article is interested in how famous women who have migrated are remembered across European countries in ways that makes their name public and visible, be it through street names, plaques, statues or monuments for example. This article explains the methods, results and difficulties that went into creating the Register of Migrant Women Landmarks in Europe (hereinafter RMWLE), central to the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action project "Women on the Move" (CA19112 – WEMov). Women have long achieved public fame and have built important careers even while migrating, and often thanks to their migration. This article investigates how and where these figures are honoured and given pride of place in European nations, and reflects on their marginal or tokenized presence in European cities. We compare these women migrant landmarks to monuments built for their male counterparts, we trace how migrant women are often bypassed in favour of national figures that have not migrated, and we advocate for a more diverse representation of meaningful female figures to celebrate in European cities.
Files
openreseurope-4-23446.pdf
Files
(4.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:79fcdc046fcbdc40212a48d6d35f3828
|
4.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Andrews M (2007). Shaping history. Narratives of political change. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557859
- Azaryahu M (1996). The power of commemorative street names. Environ Plan D. doi:10.1068/d140311
- Bakas FE (2017). Community resilience through entrepreneurship: the role of gender. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. doi:10.1108/JEC-01-2015-0008
- Bakas FE, Čapská V, Frigren P (2023). NAKALA.
- Bancilhon M, Constantinides M, Bogucka EP (2021). Streetonomics: quantifying culture using street names. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252869
- Bartlová M (2021). Marshal Koněv and the immaculate virgin: some art-historical issued in the Czech politics of memory. Dějiny – Teorie – Kritika / History – Theory – Criticism.
- Bell JD, Domecka M (2018). The transformative potential of migration: Polish migrants' everyday life experiences in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Gend Place Cult. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1372379
- Benson M, O'Reilly K (2009). Lifestyle migration: expectations, aspirations, and experiences. doi:10.4324/9781315592398
- Berg LD, Kearns RA (1996). Naming as norming: 'race', gender, and the identity politics of naming places in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Environ Plan D. doi:10.1068/d140099
- Berg LD, Vuolteenaho J (2016). Critical toponymies: the contested politics of place naming. doi:10.4324/9781315258843
- Berlanstein LR (2004). Historicizing and gendering celebrity culture: famous women in Nineteenth-century France. J Womens Hist. doi:10.1353/jowh.2004.0077
- Boccagni P (2012). Revisiting the "transnational" in migration studies: a sociological understanding. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationals. doi:10.4000/remi.5744
- Boldt TD (2012). Migration biography and ethnic identity: on the discontinuity of biographical experience and how turning points affect the ethnicisation of identity. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847428608.003.0005
- Bond L, Rapson J (2014). The transcultural turn: interrogating memory between and beyond borders. doi:10.1515/9783110337617
- Bostenaru Dan M, Dill A, Gociman CO (2015). Digital architecture history of the first half of the 20th century in Europe. doi:10.54508/978-606-638-120-8
- Calotă I (2010). Prin spaţiul citit al străzilor bucureştene.
- Candela G, Gabriëls N, Chambers S (2023). A checklist to publish collections as data in GLAM institutions. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. doi:10.1108/GKMC-06-2023-0195
- Čapská V (2025). What memory for migrant women in central Europe? Gendered memoryscapes and transcultural histories between pasts and futures. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73982-8_16
- Clerval A, Fleury A, Rebotier J (2015). Espace et rapports de domination. doi:10.4000/books.pur.59225
- Confino A (1997). Collective memory and cultural history: problems of method. Am Hist Rev. doi:10.1086/ahr/102.5.1386
- Corona A, Ferrari L (2023). The gender gap in Europe's street names is here to stay. OBC Transeuropa.
- Cresswell T (2004). Place: a short introduction.
- Domecka M (2019). Biography, gender and migration: reflexivity and transformation in migratory processes. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia LX.
- Doss E (2018). The elephant in the room: prejudicial public art and cultural vandalism. De Arte. doi:10.1080/00043389.2018.1481909
- Entrikin JN (1991). The betweenness of place. Towards a geography of modernity. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-21086-2_2
- (2018). The European qualifications framework: supporting learning work and cross-border mobility. doi:10.2767/385613
- Federici S (2020). Revolution at point zero: housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle.
- Felecan O (2013). Hodonimie românească – între autohtonism şi cosmopolitism.
- García MEDB, Rice JQ (2023). Gender debates on the stage of the urban memorial: glitter, graffiti, and bronze. Landsc Res. doi:10.1080/01426397.2022.2120604
- Gherardi S, Poggio B (2009). Tales of ordinary leadership. A feminist approach to experiential learning. Papers: Revista de Sociologia.
- Gill K, van Hellemondt I, Larsen JK (2020). Towards a culture of care. J Landsc Archit. doi:10.1080/18626033.2020.1852684
- Glick P (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/BF00289761
- Gutiérrez-Mora D, Oto-Peralías D (2022). Gendered cities: studying urban gender bias through street names. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci. doi:10.1177/23998083211068844
- Hackstaff KB (2012). Introduction: advancing the dialogue on turning points. doi:10.2307/j.ctt9qgpjg.4
- Hamilton M, Howard J, Pick D (2008). Editorial. Hist Workshop J. doi:10.1093/hwj/dbn023
- Hayden D (1996). The power of place: urban landscapes as public history.
- Hilmar T (2020). Links to the past, bridges for the present?: Recognition among memory organizations in a European network. doi:10.1515/9781789206951-014
- Hintermann C, Pichler H (2015). Gendered spaces in the city: critical topography in geography education. GI_FORUM-Journal for Geographic Information Science. doi:10.1553/giscience2015s287
- Hofmann ET (2014). Does gender ideology matter in migration? Evidence from the Republic of Georgia. Int J Sociol. doi:10.2753/IJS0020-7659440302
- Jaroslav D (2011). Commemorative place names - their specificity and problems. Names A Journal of Onomastics. doi:10.1179/002777311X13082331190074
- Johnson N (1995). Cast in stone: monuments, geography, and nationalism. Environ Plan D. doi:10.1068/d130051
- Krippendorff K (2019). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. doi:10.4135/9781071878781
- Levitt P, Glick-Schiller N (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: a transnational social field perspective on society. Int Migr Rev. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
- Lukes S (2005). Power: a radical view.
- Manning P (2006). Cross-community migration: a distinctive human pattern. Soc Evol Hist.
- Maurantonio N (2014). The politics of memory. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.026
- McGinnis L (2022). Memorializing masculinity? Gendering the iconography of French colonialism and anticolonial resistance in Martinique and Guadeloupe. Interventions. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2022.2054006
- Middle SA (2023). Documentation checklist for (Linked) humanities data. Int J Digit Humanities. doi:10.1007/s42803-023-00072-z
- Miyamoto B, Ruiz M (2021). Art and migration: revisioning the borders of community. doi:10.7765/9781526149718
- Novas Ferradás M (2018). Commemorative urban practices and gender equality: the case of Santiago de Compostela City's urban toponymy. Hábitat y Sociedad. doi:10.12795/HABITATYSOCIEDAD.2018.I11.07
- Ojala-Fulwood M, Miyamoto B, Ruiz M (2024). Memorializing women on the move: a register of migrant women landmarks in Europe [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. Open Res Eur. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.17052.1
- Ouali N, Lannoy P, Desamoury V (2021). Women in Brussels' street names. Bruss Stud. doi:10.4000/brussels.5433
- Parry K (2020). Quantitative content analysis of the visual.
- Peres OM, Polidori MC, Tomiello F (2015). Patrimonio cultural y SIG: escalas de visualización y preservación. Ciencias Espaciales. doi:10.5377/ce.v8i2.2095
- Posso-Yépez MA, Godoy-Guevara GL, Posso-Astudillo ÁM (2025). Female public sculptures: visibly invisible. Soc Sci. doi:10.3390/socsci14090516
- Räsänen P (2019). Laura Fransiska Elvira Bono.
- Reeder M (2018). Monuments to notable women: increasing female representation in public space. Trinity Women's Review.
- Ristovska-Josifovska B (2020). The movement of population - An indicator and driver of the Macedonian historical processes.
- Romero C, Álvarez G, Baselga C (2010). La Zaragoza de las Mujeres.
- Rose-Redwood R, Alderman D, Azaryahu M (2010). Geographies of toponymic inscription: new directions in critical place-name studies. Prog Hum Geogr. doi:10.1177/0309132509351042
- Rusu MS (2024). "No woman's land?" The gendered patterning of urban street names in Romania. Womens Stud Int Forum. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102909
- Rutkowski M (2023). Street names as the stuff of "banal patriotism". Prace Językoznawcze. doi:10.31648/pj.9187
- Scholl S (2020). A Genève, un mur des revendications.
- Schwarzbach AF (2014). Entwurfsbeschreibung [Enthüllung der Figur].
- Sèbe B (2020). Colonial heroes. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620665.003.0027
- Smith K (2006). Uses of heritage. doi:10.4324/9780203602263
- Smith K (2017). Women, asylum and resistance: a feminist narrative approach to making sense of stories. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-48568-7_8
- Stish J (2023). Acceptable activists, absence, and antifeminists: a feminist historical critique of national statuary hall.
- Štular B, Belak M (2022). Deep data example: Zbiva, early medieval data set for the Eastern Alps. Res Data J Humanit Soc Sci.
- (2019). The UNESCO recommendation on the historic urban landscape: report of the second consultation on its implementation by member states.
- Widrich M (2020). Performative materials and activist commemoration. CAP - Pub Art J. doi:10.48619/cap.v2i1.297
- Yin RK (2003). Case study research: design and methods.