Published April 16, 2026 | Version v7
Preprint Restricted

HBP | Main | 1.1 • Mittag–Leffler for Helson Zeta via Blur

Authors/Creators

Description

We develop a six-part blur/packet program for a Helson-Mittag-Leffler theory built from fresh dyadic prime blocks, boundary guards, and packet exhaustion, under the standing no-small-primes convention
\[
\chi(p)=1 \qquad (p\le P_0).
\]

The final outcome is a constructive prescribed-divisor theorem for Helson zeta-functions above any fixed left boundary \(\sigma_-<1\). The special case \(\sigma_-=1/2\) is the one used later in the blur program.

Paper I (Blueprint)  
States the revised architecture of the program. The key finite step is the finite signed packet theorem; the global completion is nested packet exhaustion.

Paper II (Endpoints)  
Packages the short complex-analytic consequences: factorization, divisor readout, and the passage from a constructed Helson zeta to the final prescribed-divisor statement.

Paper III (Local controllability)  
Proves the one-window actuator: inside one far-out smooth log-window of primes, one can realize finite target data while keeping finitely many frozen constraints small.

Paper IV (Boundary transfer)  
Develops the geometric side: boundary blur, deblurring, logarithmic Rouché, and the transfer from boundary overlap to actual divisor control.

Paper V (Finite signed packets)  
Proves the local finite signed packet theorem in the thin-packet regime. Old-boundary constraints and packet-site constraints are handled simultaneously by one augmented finite-dimensional collocation problem. This yields one signed packet insertion, then finitely many by induction.

Paper VI (Global exhaustion)  
Passes from the finite theorem to a locally finite divisor theorem above \(\sigma_-<1\). Using disjoint packet discs, summable guard budgets, and a diagonal exhaustion, one obtains a meromorphic Helson zeta with exactly the prescribed divisor.

In short: the final program shows that the natural ambient for the Helson-Mittag-Leffler problem is the dyadic Euler side itself. Blur remains essential, but as a geometric control and read-out mechanism rather than as a replacement for the arithmetic engine.

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Additional details

Related works

Is required by
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.17162608 (DOI)

References

  • H. Helson, Compact groups and Dirichlet series, Ark. Mat. 8 (1969), 139–143.
  • J. Andersson, Mittag–Leffler type theorems for Helson zeta-functions, arXiv:2408.15713 [math.NT], 2024.
  • K. Seip, Universality and distribution of zeros and poles of some zeta functions, J. Anal. Math. 141 (2020), 331–381.
  • I. Bochkov and R. Romanov, On zeroes and poles of Helson zeta functions, J. Funct. Anal. 282 (2022), 109398.
  • N. U. Arakelyan, Uniform and tangential approximations by analytic functions, Izv. Akad. Nauk Arm. SSR, Mat. 3 (1968), 273–286.
  • E. M. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Princeton Lectures in Analysis, Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, 2003.
  • J. B. Conway, Functions of One Complex Variable I, 2nd ed., Springer, 1978.
  • B. Ya. Levin, Distribution of Zeros of Entire Functions, American Mathematical Society, 1980.