Published September 11, 2025 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Application of the DIBR II - TOPSIS hybrid model in the selection of a form of manoeuvre in urban offensive operations

Authors/Creators

  • 1. ROR icon University of Defence
  • 2. University of Defence in Belgrade, Military Academy

Description

Modern military operations are characterized by high dynamism and uncertainty, demanding rapid decision-making that accounts for numerous complex factors. Urban offensive operations, in particular, present unique challenges due to dense terrain, the presence of civilians, and the fluid nature of combat dynamics. Selecting the optimal form of maneuver is a critical component in developing a course of action (COA) and requires the balancing of multiple, often conflicting, criteria. This paper presents a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model that integrates the DIBR II (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods to support informed and structured decisionmaking at the tactical level. DIBR II is used to determine the relative importance of criteria, while TOPSIS identifies the most suitable form of maneuver based on proximity to an ideal solution. The model is applied to a simulated urban operation scenario, evaluating maneuver forms against expertdefined criteria. This approach reduces subjectivity and enhances decision efficiency by providing a transparent and replicable framework. Universal criteria for maneuver selection, as proposed by military experts, are incorporated. Beyond maneuver selection, the model demonstrates potential applicability to other aspects of operational planning, such as risk assessment and target prioritization. 

Files

M33 VojNa 2025-2.pdf

Files (7.9 MB)

Name Size
md5:e0bb9575d82bc5a153322c5b2c777046
7.9 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Ardil, C. (2019). Fighter Aircraft Selection Using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Analysis. Engineering and Technology International Journal of Transport and Vehicle Engineering, 13 (10).
  • Božanić, D. & Pamučar, D. (2023). Overview of the Method Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II and Its Application in Multi-criteria Decision-Making. In: Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., Yazdani, M., Panchal, D. (eds) Computational Intelligence for Engineering and Management Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 984. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8493-8_64
  • Božanić, D., Epler, I., Puška, A., Biswas, S., Marinković, D., & Koprivica, S. (2024) Application of the DIBR II– rough MABAC decision-making model for ranking methods and techniques of lean organization systems management in the process of technical maintenance. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 22(1), 101-123
  • Chen S. J. , Hwang C. L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Berlin, Springer Verlag
  • Department of the Army. (2019). ADP 3-90: Offense and defense. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Department of the Army. (2022a). FM 3-0: Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army
  • Department of the Army. (2022b). ATP 3-06/MCTP 12-10B: Urban operations. Headquarters, Department of the Army, and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.
  • Department of the Army. (2023). FM 3-90: Tactics. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Department of the Army. (2024a). FM 5-0: Planning and Orders Production. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army
  • Department of the Army. (2024b). ATP 3-06.11: Brigade Combat Team Urban Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army
  • Esfandiari, M., & Rizvandi, M. (2014). An application of TOPSIS method for ranking different strategic planning methodology. Management Science Letters, 4(7), 1445-1448
  • Generalštab Vojske Srbije. (2017). Uputstvo za operativno planiranje i rad komandi u Vojsci Srbije, Beograd
  • Hamurcu, M., & Eren, T. (2020). Selection of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles by Using Multicriteria Decision‐Making for Defence. Journal of Mathematics, 2020(1), 4308756
  • Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1982). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications – A State of Art Survey, Berlin, Springer Verlag
  • Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., Đorović, B. (2011). Fuzzy logic in decision making process in the Armed Forces of Serbia. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing & Co. KG
  • Pamučar, D. S., Božanić, D. I., & Kurtov, D. V. (2016). Fuzzification of the Saaty's scale and a presentation of the hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model: an example of the selection of a Brigade Artillery Group firing position in a defensive operation. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 64(4), 966-986.
  • Qu, S., Zheng, Y., Yan, H., Deng, W., & Liu, T. (2021, May). Operational effectiveness evaluation of antimissile early warning based on combination weighted TOPSIS. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1927, No. 1, p. 012007). IOP Publishing
  • Radovanović, M., Petrovski, A., Behlić, A., Perišić, M., Samopjan, M., & Lakanović, B. (2023b). Application model of MCDM for selection of automatic rifle. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 185– 196. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10011102023r
  • Radovanović, M., Petrovski, A., Cirkin, E., Behlić, A., Jokić, Ž., Chemezov, D., Hashimov, E. G., Bouraima, M. B., & Jana, C. (2024). Application of the new hybrid model LMAW-G-EDAS multi-criteria decision-making when choosing an assault rifle for the needs of the army. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 4(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10021012024r
  • Slavković, R. V., Šipka, B. B., & Jukić, J. K. (2018). Manevar u napadnoj operaciji snaga kopnene vojske. Vojno delo, 70(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo1802277S
  • Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Radovanović, M., & Petrovski, A. (2023а). Optimising Assault Boat Selection for Military Operations: An Application of the DIBR II-BM-CoCoSo MCDM Model. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 2 (4), pp 160-171. DOI:10.56578/jimd020401.
  • Tešić, D., Božanić, D. And Milić, A. (2023b). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model for pontoon bridge selection: An application of the DIBR II-NWBM-FF MAIRCA approach. Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 2(4), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse020403
  • Tešić, D. Z., Božanić, D. I., & Puška, A. (2024). Application of multi-criteria decision making for the selection of a location for crossing a water obstacle by fording in a defense operation. Vojnotehnički glasnik, 72(3), 1120-1146. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg72-51249
  • Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Miljković, B., & Puška, A. (2025). MCDM model for the selection of network planning techniques in the army for the purposes of performing engineering works when overcoming water obstacles. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 5(1), 70– 86. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10006062025t
  • Yıldızbası, A., & Gür, L. (2020). A decision support model for unmanned aerial vehicles assisted disaster response using AHP-TOPSIS method. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (20), 56-66
  • Žnidaršič V., Dojić K.V., Milić N.L. (2024). Selection of Landing Site for Infantry River Crossing Using Aluminum Boat M70: Application of DIBR and Topsis Method. International conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, 2024, № 1, p. 193-200. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2024-0027