Published November 6, 2025 | Version v1

Comparative Study Between the Turbulent Gravitational Field Theory (TGFT) and the Unified Field Theory (UFT): Differences in Physical Origin, Generation Mechanism, and Experimental Basis

  • 1. Independent Researcher

Description

This paper presents a systematic comparative analysis between the Turbulent Gravitational Field Theory (TGFT) and Zhang Xiangqian’s Unified Field Theory (UFT). Although the two frameworks appear superficially similar in mathematical form, they differ fundamentally in their physical origins, derivation paths, and experimental verifiability.

The UFT is based on the hypothesis of a spacetime-geometry response equation, attempting to interpret gravitation, electromagnetism, quantum interaction, and nuclear force as various manifestations of spacetime inertia geometry. Its representative equation,

represents a hypothetical geometrical correspondence rather than a process derived from experimental physics.

In contrast, TGFT originates from plasma dynamics and high-frequency electromagnetic turbulence experiments. Its governing equation,

is obtained through a multiscale averaging procedure applied to the Maxwell–Plasma system, where κis an experimentally measurable coupling coefficient of turbulent energy flow. TGFT defines gravity as a longitudinal energy-gradient phenomenon generated by plasma turbulence, rather than as spacetime curvature.

The analysis demonstrates that UFT and TGFT belong to two fundamentally distinct theoretical categories: UFT is a formal geometrical unification model, whereas TGFT is an energy-generation model grounded in experimental evidence. By clearly distinguishing between them, this paper formally asserts the independence and priority of TGFT in both physical mechanism and experimental foundation, thereby providing a solid theoretical basis for controllable gravitational phenomena.

本文对湍动引力场理论(Turbulent Gravitational Field Theory, TGFT)与张祥前的统一场论(Unified Field Theory, UFT)进行了系统的比较分析。尽管二者在数学形式上存在表面上的相似性,但在物理起源、推导路径及可验证性方面存在根本性差异。

UFT 基于时空几何响应方程的假设,将引力、电磁力、量子作用及核力都解释为空间惯性几何的不同表现形式。其代表性方程

体现的是一种假设性的几何对应关系,而非来源于实验的物理过程。

相对而言,TGFT 源自等离子体动力学与高频电磁湍动实验。其主方程

是通过 Maxwell–Plasma 方程的多尺度平均化推导而得,其中 κ为可实验测量的湍动能流耦合系数。TGFT 将引力定义为由等离子体湍动能量流产生的纵向能量梯度,而非时空的几何弯曲。

研究表明,UFT 与 TGFT 分别属于两种根本不同的理论范畴:UFT 是一种形式几何统一模型,而 TGFT 是基于实验事实的能量生成模型。通过明确区分两者,本文正式声明 TGFT 在物理机制与实验基础上的独立性与原创优先权,为可控引力现象的理论奠定了坚实基础。

Keywords: Turbulent Gravitational Field Theory (TGFT); Unified Field Theory (UFT); longitudinal wave; plasma turbulence; energy gradient; experimental verification; theoretical independence.

Files

Zhao_Shanhu_TGFT_vs_UFT_Comparative_Research_2025.pdf

Files (336.9 kB)

Name Size
md5:8a8653e265dc5a70aef85d68bf78e4f8
336.9 kB Preview Download