MODERN ENGLISH DISCOURSE AND THE PRAGMATICS OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION: EMOJI, IRONY, AND CONTEXTUAL MEANING
Authors/Creators
Description
This article explores modern English discourse and the pragmatics of digital communication, focusing on the use of emoji, irony, and contextual meaning. It examines how digital interlocutors employ emojis and ironic expressions to convey nuanced emotional and social cues, and how context shapes interpretation in online interactions. The study highlights the dynamic relationship between language, technology, and meaning-making, showing how digital communication strategies influence understanding, social engagement, and pragmatic competence in English.
Files
1872-1877.pdf
Files
(220.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8f89b337a3e1061c6a9c7fa49c44574a
|
220.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1.Danesi, M. (2016). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the Internet. Bloomsbury Academic. 2.Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge. 3.Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x 4.Walther, J. B., & D'Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307 5.Zappavigna, M. (2018). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. Bloomsbury Academic. 6.Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. R. (2017). "Oh so ironic": Emoji and irony in computer-mediated communication. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 135–154). Wiley. 7.Tagg, C. (2015). Digital discourse: Linguistic analysis in online contexts. Routledge.