Published October 27, 2025 | Version v4.1b

Global Regularity of the Navier–Stokes Equations via the PBFD–Ω Framework (v4.1b)

  • 1. RehaBrain Development Center

Description

Navier–Stokes Existence and Smoothness through the PBFD–Ω Framework (v4.1b)

A Structural–Analytic Proof and Open Verification Study

This upload presents the complete analytic framework and proof structure of the PBFD–Ω (Prime-Based Force Dispersion and Ω-Regularity) program, which addresses the existence and smoothness problem for the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations.  
It consolidates three key stages of the project as follows:

1. Navier_Stokes_Existence_and_Smoothness_Skeleton.pdf
   Provides the foundational structure outlining the Φ–Δ–Ω hierarchy and the initial formulation of the regularity hypothesis.

2. 3.2b_Navier_Stokes_Existence_and_Smoothness__PBFD_LES_and_Dimensional_Expansion_Framework.pdf
   Develops the dimensional-expansion and Large-Eddy-Simulation (LES) reduction framework that defines the PBFD dynamic operator basis and prime-indexed energy coupling.

3. PBFD_Omega_v4_1_FullIntegrated.pdf
   Contains the full analytic completion (v4.1b), the coercivity inequality (A2), residual-control lemmas, the time-averaged regularity theorem, and Appendices A–C describing the Open Verification Integration protocol.  
   This document formalizes a reproducible analytic pathway that allows independent verification of the results via numerical flux calibration and residual-energy evaluation.

 

Together, these works form a coherent and fully reproducible analytic program demonstrating that forced antisymmetric energy dispersion, inherent in the PBFD–Ω framework, ensures global regularity for all Leray–Hopf weak solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations.

Files

PBFD_Omega_v4_1_FullIntegrated.pdf

Additional details

Additional titles

Subtitle
A Deterministic Analytic Proof with Open Verification Protocols

References

  • Leray, J. (1934). Essai sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace. Acta Mathematica, 63, 193–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547354
  • Constantin, P., & Foias, C. (1988). Navier–Stokes Equations. University of Chicago Press.
  • Tao, T. (2016). Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 29(3), 601–674. https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/844
  • Doering, C. R., & Gibbon, J. D. (1995). Applied Analysis of the Navier–Stokes Equations. Cambridge University Press.
  • Foias, C., Manley, O. P., Rosa, R., & Temam, R. (2001). Navier–StokesFoias, C., Manley, O. P., Rosa, R., & Temam, R. (2001). Navier–Stokes Equations and Turbulence. Cambridge University Press. Equations and Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
  • Fefferman, C. L. (2006). Existence and Smoothness of the Navier–Stokes Equation. Clay Mathematics Institute Millennium Problem Statement. https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/navierstokes.pdf
  • Moon, K.-U. (2025). Navier–Stokes Regularity via the PBFD–Ω Framework (v4.1b). RehaBrain Development Center / Zenodo Preprint. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17453109
  • Moon, K.-U. (2025). Dimensional Expansion and Prime-Based Dispersion in the Navier–Stokes Equations. Zenodo Preprint.