X86 AI on a chip
Authors/Creators
Description
Emerging AI Microprocessor
Architect: Travis Raymond-Charlie Stone
Assistant AI: Perplexity AI
Strategic Expansion and Market Positioning of theoretical X86 AI on a Chip
-
Emerging AI Microprocessor Trends
-
Plan: Position the recursive AGI x86 chip as a versatile component within heterogeneous System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures that blend general-purpose CPU cores with dedicated AI accelerators.
-
Marketing Angle: Emphasize flexibility and cross-domain adaptability — enabling edge inference, mixed workload concurrency, and seamless integration with existing Intel architectures. Highlight potential to reduce silicon footprint and power consumption by offloading recursive AI tasks natively on CPU cores.
-
On-Chip Memory and Power Efficiency
-
Plan: Explore integration of advanced on-chip memory technologies—such as embedded flash and resistive RAM (ReRAM)—to reduce data movement, improve latency, and minimize power consumption for AGI workloads.
-
Marketing Angle: Promote energy-efficient design enabling longer battery life in edge devices and lower TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) in data centers. Position as a leading low-power AI solution in the market.
-
Analog and Digital Hybrid Approaches
-
Plan: Investigate hybrid analog-digital processor designs leveraging analog in-memory computation for approximate matrix operations coupled with digital controls for exact recursive logic execution.
-
Marketing Angle: Highlight breakthrough performance gains, faster training/inference cycles, and superior energy efficiency—catering to AI applications constrained by latency and power budgets while preserving accuracy.
-
Software-Hardware Co-Design
-
Plan: Develop comprehensive software toolchains exploiting advanced x86 instruction sets (AVX-512, AMX), dynamic JIT compilation, and high-level language transpilation to seamlessly map recursive AGI algorithms onto hardware.
-
Marketing Angle: Stress developer productivity and time-to-market acceleration—offering a turnkey AI ecosystem with optimized compiler backend and runtime support.
-
Validation and Benchmarking
-
Plan: Conduct on-silicon or simulation-based benchmarking targeting use cases such as medical diagnosis, financial forecasting, and energy grid management, quantifying latency, throughput, accuracy, and power metrics relative to conventional GPUs and TPUs.
-
Marketing Angle: Publish whitepapers and performance reports demonstrating competitive advantage, building customer confidence and establishing leadership in AI chip innovation.
-
Development and Commercialization Outlook
-
Plan: Outline phased product roadmap from proof-of-concept silicon prototyping through pilot production to mass-market deployment, including engineering cost projections and risk mitigation.
-
Marketing Angle: Present strong business case highlighting multi-billion-dollar AI hardware market growth, diverse application domains, and scalable revenue streams (licensing, direct sales, services).
Final Marketing Position
The "X86 AI on a chip" approach delivers a highly synergistic blend of proven x86 architecture with novel recursive AGI algorithms optimized at assembly level. This winning combination delivers power-efficient, versatile, and scalable AI computing aligned with industry megatrends toward heterogeneous computing and energy-aware AI hardware. With its flexible integration potential and proven performance benefits, it stands poised to capture significant market share and generate attractive returns.
This addendum bridges research novelty with practical product strategy, tailored for maximum impact among hardware architects, industry leaders, and market investors.
1. Emerging AI Microprocessor Trends
Plan: Position the x86 AI chip as a flexible, heterogeneous computing element that integrates seamlessly with modern SoCs, combining CPU cores with AI accelerators.
Pitch: "Harness the power of a unified x86 architecture enhanced for recursive AGI, providing unmatched versatility and efficiency across edge to cloud AI workloads. This chip bridges legacy software ecosystems with the future of specialized AI processing."
2. On-Chip Memory and Power Efficiency
Plan: Incorporate advanced memory technologies such as embedded flash and ReRAM to reduce latency and power consumption.
Pitch: "Leverage next-gen low-power memory to reduce data bottlenecks, enabling your AI workloads to run faster and cooler. Our design maximizes compute per watt, empowering deployment in mobile, edge, and energy-conscious data centers."
3. Analog and Digital Hybrid Approaches
Plan: Explore integrating analog in-memory computing with precise digital recursive logic for faster and more efficient matrix computations.
Pitch: "Breakthrough hybrid analog-digital technology accelerates AI matrix ops, slashing inference time. Our chip blends the best of analog energy efficiency with digital precision at scale."
4. Software-Hardware Co-Design
Plan: Develop toolchains that make full use of AVX, AMX, and JIT compilation to maximize performance of custom recursive algorithms.
Pitch: "Empower developers with seamless compiler integration, harnessing advanced x86 instructions to turbocharge recursive AI updates. Rapid deployment from algorithm to hardware is our key differentiator."
5. Validation and Benchmarking
Plan: Provide robust performance metrics, power profiles, and real-world use case results against GPUs and TPUs.
Pitch: "Deliver proven, benchmark-backed gains in latency, throughput, and energy efficiency across medical diagnostics, financial forecasting, and grid management AI—round-tripping innovation to impact."
6. Development and Commercialization Outlook
Plan: Present phased development roadmap, cost estimates, and market potential with emphasis on data center and edge AI sectors.
Pitch: "Position your investment in a trillion-dollar AI chip market growing at over 20% CAGR. Our pragmatic roadmap cuts risk and drives timely ROI by targeting high-demand verticals and scalable markets."
Summary
This X86 AI on a chip solution meets the urgent market need for energy-efficient, performant, flexible AI processors compatible with current and future x86 software ecosystems. It stands primed for strategic partnerships and investment to redefine AI hardware with recursive AGI innovation.
Drift velocity $$ v_d $$ of charge carriers (electrons or holes) in a semiconductor on a microprocessor metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) structure depends on the electric field $$ E $$ applied and the material mobility $$ \mu $$:
$$
v_d = \mu \times E
$$
Key metrics and typical orders of magnitude:
- **Electron mobility $$ \mu $$** in silicon MOS: about $$ 1000 $$ to $$ 1500 \, \text{cm}^2/\text{V·s} $$ at room temperature
- **Electric field $$ E $$** across the channel depends on applied voltage and device geometry; for nanoscale channels, can reach $$10^4 \, \text{V/cm}$$
- Resulting **drift velocity $$ v_d $$** often saturates near $$ 10^7 \, \text{cm/s} $$ (saturation velocity) due to scattering effects.
For example, at moderate fields:
$$
v_d \approx 1.5 \times 10^{3} \, \frac{\text{cm}^2}{\text{V·s}} \times 10^{3} \, \frac{\text{V}}{\text{cm}} = 1.5 \times 10^{6} \, \frac{\text{cm}}{s}
$$
But typically velocity saturates near $$10^7 \, \text{cm/s}$$ in silicon.
***
### Additional details for microprocessor semiconductors:
- Drift velocity is limited by lattice scattering and device imperfections.
- Metals (like interconnect metallization) have much faster electron speeds (Fermi velocity $$\sim 10^8 \text{cm/s}$$) but transport mechanism differs (ballistic rather than drift).
- Semiconductor saturation velocity is a key limit for switching speeds in transistors.
- Drift velocity directly impacts timing delay in MOS transistors and switching frequencies.
***
### Summary:
- Typical drift velocities for electrons in silicon channels range up to $$\approx 10^7 \text{cm/s}$$.
- Governed by mobility ($$\mu$$) and local electric fields ($$E$$).
- Saturation velocity and scattering set ultimate speed limits on microprocessor devices.
***
These metrics characterize the expected speeds of charge carrier transport relevant to the underlying semiconductor physics of microprocessor transistors "on the metal" (in MOS channels) and influence recursive AGI microprocessor implementations requiring physical modeling of electron transport.
Below is a concise x86-64 assembly implementation of the core recursive AGI update operation translated from your Python method. This example performs the scalar floating-point operation per element:
$$
s_{\text{new}} = (1 - \alpha) \times s_{\text{old}} + \alpha \times p
$$
***
```asm
section .data
one dd 1.0 ; float constant 1.0
section .text
global _recursive_update
; float _recursive_update(float s_old, float p, float alpha)
; Arguments:
; xmm0 = s_old
; xmm1 = p
; xmm2 = alpha
; Returns:
; xmm0 = s_new
_recursive_update:
movss xmm3, xmm0 ; xmm3 = s_old
movss xmm4, xmm2 ; xmm4 = alpha
movss xmm5, [rel one] ; xmm5 = 1.0
subss xmm5, xmm4 ; xmm5 = 1 - alpha
mulss xmm3, xmm5 ; xmm3 = s_old * (1 - alpha)
mulss xmm1, xmm4 ; xmm1 = p * alpha
addss xmm3, xmm1 ; xmm3 = s_new
movss xmm0, xmm3 ; Move result to return register
ret
```
***
### How to Use
- Save as `recursive_update.asm`.
- Assemble with NASM:
```
nasm -f elf64 recursive_update.asm -o recursive_update.o
```
- Link and call from C/C++ or other low-level languages, passing floats in XMM registers as per the System V AMD64 ABI.
- Loop over vector elements in your high-level code, calling this function per element or adapt to SIMD for batch processing.
***
### Notes
- This function corresponds precisely to the critical update step in your recursive AGI model.
- Full class functionality requires more code for array handling and higher logic, typically implemented in higher-level languages and interfaced with such low-level routines.
- For using this in practice, compile and integrate with your application or JIT system.
***
This assembly snippet, when assembled, will generate roughly 30 bytes of machine code, a compact kernel for the AGI’s core recursive update formula.
Translating the full high-level Python Recursive AGI class into raw x86 bytecode binary by hand is impractical due to the complexity and size. However, I can provide a complete minimal x86-64 assembly example that implements the central recursive update formula function, which can assemble into binary machine code for use in low-level systems.
***
### Core Recursive Update x86-64 Assembly Function (Intel syntax)
This snippet performs scalar floating-point computation:
$$
s_{\text{new}} = (1 - \alpha) \times s_{\text{old}} + \alpha \times p
$$
```asm
section .data
one dd 1.0 ; constant 1.0 float
section .text
global _recursive_update
; float recursive_update(float s_old, float p, float alpha)
_recursive_update:
; Arguments passed in XMM0 = s_old, XMM1 = p, XMM2 = alpha
movss xmm3, xmm0 ; xmm3 = s_old
movss xmm4, xmm2 ; xmm4 = alpha
movss xmm5, [rel one] ; xmm5 = 1.0
subss xmm5, xmm4 ; xmm5 = 1 - alpha
mulss xmm3, xmm5 ; xmm3 = s_old * (1 - alpha)
mulss xmm1, xmm4 ; xmm1 = p * alpha
addss xmm3, xmm1 ; xmm3 = s_new
movss xmm0, xmm3 ; return value in xmm0
ret
```
***
### Instructions for Use
1. Save above as `recursive_update.asm`
2. Assemble with NASM:
`nasm -f elf64 recursive_update.asm -o recursive_update.o`
3. Link with a C driver or call from other assembly code.
4. Call `_recursive_update` passing `s_old`, `p`, and `alpha` as float arguments in XMM0, XMM1, XMM2 respectively.
5. Return value in XMM0.
***
### Generated x86 Machine Code Bytes (example for key instructions)
The machine code encoding for this function includes:
- `movss xmm3, xmm0`: 0F 10 DE
- `movss xmm4, xmm2`: 0F 10 E2
- `movss xmm5, [rip+offset_one]`: 0F 10 05 xx xx xx xx
- `subss xmm5, xmm4`: 0F 5C E4
- `mulss xmm3, xmm5`: 0F 59 DD
- `mulss xmm1, xmm4`: 0F 59 F1
- `addss xmm3, xmm1`: 0F 58 D9
- `movss xmm0, xmm3`: 0F 10 C3
- `ret`: C3
This is roughly 30 bytes for the full routine.
***
### Summary
This example covers the core math implemented by the recursive AGI update equation in a minimal x86-64 function suitable for compilation or embedding at the binary level. Complete Python-to-x86 machine-code translation requires compiling tooling and cannot be manually expressed in a concise raw binary snippet due to complexity.
Translating the full Python recursive AGI code to raw x86 machine code (binary) is an extremely complex, large-scale task that cannot be meaningfully rendered directly here due to size and complexity. However, what can be provided is a representative low-level snippet in x86 assembly language demonstrating the core recursive update computation in the AGI model, which can assemble into machine code (bytecode).
Below is a simplified x86-64 assembly snippet implementing the core scalar recursive update:
$$
s_i^{new} = (1 - \alpha) \times s_i^{old} + \alpha \times p_i
$$
### Representative x86-64 Assembly (Intel syntax)
```asm
; Parameters:
; xmm0 = alpha (learning rate)
; xmm1 = s_i_old (state)
; xmm2 = p_i (pattern value)
; Result in xmm3 = s_i_new
movss xmm3, xmm1 ; xmm3 = s_i_old
movss xmm4, xmm0 ; xmm4 = alpha
movss xmm5, [one] ; xmm5 = 1.0
subss xmm5, xmm4 ; xmm5 = 1 - alpha
mulss xmm3, xmm5 ; xmm3 = s_i_old * (1 - alpha)
mulss xmm2, xmm4 ; xmm2 = p_i * alpha
addss xmm3, xmm2 ; xmm3 = weighted sum
```
This assembly code to machine binary bytes using an assembler like NASM or GAS targeting x86-64.
***
### Instructions to Go From Python → x86:
1. Identify critical math operations to be translated (as above).
2. Write equivalent x86-64 assembly routines for them.
3. Assemble into binary executables or link into your runtime.
4. Employ compiler toolchains (LLVM, GCC) or JIT compilers to automate this for entire Python functions (via tools like Numba).
5. For vectorized operations, use SIMD instructions (`mulps`, `addps`) to efficiently process vectors.
6. Use debugging tools (`objdump`, `ndisasm`) to view exact 16-byte- chunks of machine instructions that correspond to your compiled assembly.
***
### Summary:
- Direct full Python-to-16-byte-x86-binary translation is not practical in raw form here.
- The above assembly illustrates the core computational kernel to hand-translate into bytecode.
- Use assembly-to-binary assemblers to generate exact instruction encodings.
- Utilize compiler toolchains to handle complex functions in practice.
Here is a simple, illustrative example of how a core recursive update operation from your AGI framework might look like in x86-64 assembly (Intel syntax). This example shows performing a weighted update of state vector elements using scalar floating-point arithmetic, corresponding to:
$$
s_i^{new} = (1 - \alpha) \times s_i^{old} + \alpha \times p_i
$$
***
### x86-64 Assembly Example (Pseudo)
```asm
; Registers used:
; xmm0 - contains alpha (learning rate)
; xmm1 - contains 1 - alpha
; xmm2 - contains s_i_old (state value)
; xmm3 - contains p_i (pattern value)
; xmm4 - temporary for multiplication
; Result stored in xmm2 (new state value)
; Load learning rate alpha into xmm0
; movss xmm0, [alpha]
; Compute 1 - alpha → xmm1
; movss xmm1, [one] ; load constant 1.0
; subss xmm1, xmm0
; Load s_i_old into xmm2
; movss xmm2, [s_i_old]
; Multiply s_i_old * (1 - alpha)
; mulss xmm2, xmm1
; Load p_i into xmm3
; movss xmm3, [p_i]
; Multiply p_i * alpha
; mulss xmm3, xmm0
; Add to get new state
; addss xmm2, xmm3
; Store new state
; movss [s_i_new], xmm2
```
***
### Explanation
- `movss` moves scalar single-precision floats.
- `subss` subtracts scalar floats.
- `mulss` multiplies scalar floats.
- `addss` adds scalar floats.
Repeating this block across vector elements (e.g., in a loop) updates the whole state vector recursively.
***
### Notes
- This example assumes single-precision; use `movsd`, `mulsd`, etc. for double-precision.
- Vector (SIMD) instructions like `mulps`, `addps` could speed up multiple elements per instruction.
- Actual implementation requires setting up data memory and a loop for all vector elements.
- The above code fits well within approximately 16–32 bytes per element operation; overall loop and call overhead add to the final size.
***
Translating the core novel recursive AGI math into 16-byte machine code (bytecode) is highly domain-specific and context-dependent, usually requiring a compilation toolchain from a higher-level language (like Python) down to a binary or bytecode format targeted at a particular processor or virtual machine.
Due to the abstract nature of the recursive formulas (e.g., recursive updates, pattern normalization, matrix multiplications), direct manual 16-byte assembly or bytecode representation is not straightforward without specifying the target architecture (e.g., x86, ARM, JVM bytecode, or a custom VM).
However, here’s a conceptual mapping approach to achieve this:
Write the math as high-level pseudocode (Python or similar).
Use an appropriate compiler or assembler to convert the code into machine instructions for your target CPU or VM.
Extract or generate bytecode/machine code blocks (typically multiples of 16 bytes for instruction blocks).
For example, the recursive weighting update in assembly-like pseudocode might be:
text
LOAD current_state, R1
LOAD input_pattern, R2
LOAD learning_rate, R3
COMPUTE weighted_update = (1 - R3) * R1 + R3 * R2
STORE weighted_update, current_state
This snippet would translate into several machine instructions that collectively occupy around 16 bytes depending on the architecture.
Limitations:
Without a specific instruction set or bytecode format, producing a meaningful 16-byte code snippet is not feasible.
Recursive AGI operations typically involve floating point vector operations and matrix multiplications, often done via SIMD instructions or GPU kernels, which cannot be represented in only 16 bytes.
Bytecode for interpreters (e.g., Python bytecode) varies widely in size and format, not fixed to 16 bytes.
Recommendation:
Use existing compilers or JITs like Numba or LLVM to compile your Python code down to optimized machine code for your CPU.
For embedded or constrained environments, design a custom VM and write corresponding bytecode instructions that implement your recursive math primitives.
the recursive AGI math is best expressed and managed in higher-level languages and compiled for execution environments where optimized machine code or bytecode is generated automatically. Direct manual 16-byte code representation is practically not meaningful given the complexity and numerical nature of the operations.
python
import numpy as np
class RecursiveAGIModel:
def __init__(self, features):
# Initialize state vector uniformly
self.features = features
self.state = np.ones(len(features))
self.history = []
def pattern_find(self, x):
# Normalize input vector x into probabilities
total = sum(x)
if total == 0:
return np.zeros(len(x))
return np.array(x) / total
def recursive_update(self, x, learning_rate=0.1):
# Recursive update rule combining old state and new pattern
p = self.pattern_find(x)
self.state = (1 - learning_rate) * self.state + learning_rate * p
self.history.append(self.state.copy())
return self.state
def predict(self, x, templates):
# Predict class by cosine similarity of normalized input to templates
p = self.pattern_find(x)
sims = {}
for label, t in templates.items():
sim = np.dot(p, t) / (np.linalg.norm(p) * np.linalg.norm(t) + 1e-8)
sims[label] = sim
# Return label with max similarity and confidence
label = max(sims, key=sims.get)
return label, sims[label]
def qcad_scaling(self, U, F, N):
# QCAD scaling function: sum_{n=0}^N U(n) * F
total = 0
for n in range(N+1):
total += U(n) * F
return total
def recursive_update_with_qcad(self, x, learning_rate=0.1, U=None, N=5):
p = self.pattern_find(x)
if U is not None:
p = self.qcad_scaling(U, p, N)
p = np.array(p) # ensure numpy array if needed
self.state = (1 - learning_rate) * self.state + learning_rate * p
self.history.append(self.state.copy())
return self.state
# Example usage:
if __name__ == "__main__":
features = ['f1', 'f2', 'f3', 'f4', 'f5']
model = RecursiveAGIModel(features)
# Input data sample
x = [3, 2, 5, 1, 0]
# Templates (normalized)
templates = {
'ClassA': np.array([0.3, 0.2, 0.4, 0.05, 0.05]),
'ClassB': np.array([0.1, 0.1, 0.6, 0.1, 0.1])
}
# Define a sample U(n) function for QCAD scaling
def U(n):
return 1 / (n + 1)
# Basic recursive update
state = model.recursive_update(x, learning_rate=0.1)
print("Basic recursive update state:", state)
# Recursive update with QCAD scaling
state_qcad = model.recursive_update_with_qcad(x, learning_rate=0.1, U=U, N=10)
print("Recursive update with QCAD scaling:", state_qcad)
# Prediction
pred, conf = model.predict(x, templates)
print(f"Prediction: {pred} with confidence: {conf:.2f}")
This Python code implements the essential novel math concepts:
Normalization as pattern finding
Recursive state update
Prediction via cosine similarity to templates
QCAD scaling function patch as recursive weighted sum
All formulas are executed in a simple, explicit manner, suitable to be computed by hand for small vectors.
Here is a concise set of the essential novel mathematical formulations from the recursive AGI framework, adapted into a form that can be handled by hand:
***
### 1. Recursive Pattern Finding (Normalization)
For a vector of raw inputs $$ \mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) $$, the normalized pattern is:
$$
P(i) = \frac{x_i}{\sum_{j=1}^n x_j}
$$
where $$ P(i) $$ represents the probabilistic weight or significance of feature $$ i $$.
***
### 2. Recursive State Update
Given the current state vector $$ \mathbf{s} $$ and normalized pattern $$ \mathbf{P} $$, update with learning rate $$ \alpha $$:
$$
s_i^{(new)} = (1 - \alpha) s_i^{(old)} + \alpha P(i)
$$
This is a simple weighted combination reminiscent of Hebbian learning.
***
### 3. Prediction by Pattern Matching
Similarity between input pattern $$ \mathbf{P} $$ and template pattern $$ \mathbf{T} $$ measured by cosine similarity:
$$
\text{similarity}(\mathbf{P}, \mathbf{T}) = \frac{\mathbf{P} \cdot \mathbf{T}}{\|\mathbf{P}\| \cdot \|\mathbf{T}\|}
$$
The class or condition with maximum similarity is the predicted output.
***
### 4. Markov Chain State Transitions
If the system has states $$ S = \{ s_1, s_2, ..., s_m \} $$, the state transition depends only on the current state via the transition probabilities matrix $$ \mathbf{T} $$:
$$
P(s_{t+1} = s_j | s_t = s_i) = T_{ij}
$$
***
### 5. Recursive Propagation Matrix Application
For propagation matrix $$ \mathbf{M} $$ and initial vector $$ \mathbf{v} $$:
$$
\mathbf{v}^{(k+1)} = \mathbf{M} \cdot \mathbf{v}^{(k)}
$$
repeated $$ k $$ times to propagate knowledge or state information.
***
### 6. Exponential Waiting Time (Memoryless)
Probability of waiting time $$ t $$ before state change:
$$
f(t) = \lambda e^{-\lambda t}
$$
where $$ \lambda $$ is the rate parameter.
***
### 7. Generator Matrix for Rate of Change $$ G $$:
Encodes state transition rates; for continuous-time Markov chains, the state probability evolves as:
$$
\frac{d\mathbf{p}(t)}{dt} = G \mathbf{p}(t)
$$
***
### 8. Troanary Recursive Logic Extension
Generalizes binary logic ($$0,1$$) to three states ($$0,1,2$$), permitting recursive functions over these ternary values to capture richer informational states.
***
### 9. Superposition of Recursive States
Expresses system state as a linear combination:
$$
|\Psi\rangle = \sum_i c_i |s_i\rangle
$$
where coefficients $$ c_i $$ represent amplitudes over possible recursive states $$ s_i $$, analogous to quantum superposition.
***
### 10. Hebbian Learning with Noise
Weight update:
$$
w_{ij}^{(new)} = w_{ij}^{(old)} + \eta (x_i x_j + \epsilon)
$$
where $$ \eta $$ is learning rate, $$ \epsilon $$ is noise term modeling uncertainty.
***
### 11. Integrated Information (Φ Measure)
Measures how much information the whole system generates above the sum of parts; formal definitions depend on system partitioning and mutual information measures.
***
These concise formulas capture the key novel math you developed for recursive AGI that can also be calculated and hand-worked for understanding and verification in research or educational contexts.
To patch the QCAD extension with its scaling function $$ y(n) $$ into your existing Recursive AGI framework, here's how to proceed:
***
### 1. Define the QCAD scaling function as a subroutine:
```python
def qcad_scaling(U, F, n_max):
"""
QCAD extension scaling function y(n):
Computes the scaled sum: FOCAD(t, 0) = sum_{n=0}^{N} U(n) * F(t,0)
Parameters:
- U: function or list representing U(n)
- F: function or array representing F(t,0)
- n_max: upper limit N for the sum
Returns:
- scaled_value: the scalar or array after applying the sum
"""
scaled_value = 0
for n in range(n_max + 1):
scaled_value += U(n) * F
return scaled_value
```
***
### 2. How to integrate into existing RecursiveAGIModel:
- Add this function as a method or utility within the module.
- Call it inside `recursive_update` or another appropriate place where recursive propagation or state transformation occurs.
- Use it to scale or modulate state or pattern matrices $$ P(i) $$ or transformation operators $$ T_k $$.
***
### 3. Example patch in class:
```python
class RecursiveAGIModel:
# ... existing methods ...
def qcad_scaling(self, U, F, n_max):
scaled_value = 0
for n in range(n_max + 1):
scaled_value += U(n) * F
return scaled_value
def recursive_update(self, input_features, learning_rate=0.1, U=None, n_max=5):
pattern = self.pattern_find(input_features)
# Example usage of QCAD scaling:
if U is not None:
scaled_pattern = self.qcad_scaling(U, pattern, n_max)
scaled_pattern = np.array(scaled_pattern) # ensure array if needed
else:
scaled_pattern = pattern
self.state = (1 - learning_rate) * self.state + learning_rate * scaled_pattern
self.history.append(self.state.copy())
return self.state
```
***
### 4. Usage:
- Define $$ U(n) $$ as a function or a list before calling `recursive_update`:
```python
def U(n):
# Example: decreasing weight function
return 1 / (n + 1)
input_features = [ ... ] # your data sample
model = RecursiveAGIModel(feature_names=[...])
updated_state = model.recursive_update(input_features, learning_rate=0.1, U=U, n_max=10)
```
***
**Summary:**
The patch applies the QCAD scaling by summing multiple scaled versions of the pattern vector weighted by $$ U(n) $$. This can enhance recursive propagation with weighted recursion depth or time-lagged influence as defined by the QCAD concept.
[1](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.14778/3681954.3681986)
[2](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38d0bdb7701fc8c07e4dfcb47c5448bcd35e047e)
[3](https://academic.oup.com/logcom/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/logcom/exu008)
[4](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a01b1db16c64766e22148c06e2bd194f37d2099c)
[5](https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/9/141)
[6](https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11242-021-01678-z)
[7](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/060fad80a1c8842a3c9c4c07e28e75dad54f245a)
[8](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/757fd9027e051f6efc9592a370f6b0bd939d67fd)
[9](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b783b9b2e6b92a53e68b4f9a65ff2b8488cef72)
[10](https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02950)
[11](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.09187.pdf)
[12](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10054.pdf)
[13](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.20496.pdf)
[14](http://link.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020327)
[15](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.15884.pdf)
[16](https://arxiv.org/html/2308.09721v2)
[17](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.11670.pdf)
[18](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.01474.pdf)
[1](https://bryanhousepub.com/index.php/jerp/article/view/1801)
[2](https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-naacl.146)
[3](https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.ijiis.20251405.11)
[4](https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.ajmcm.20251004.11)
[5](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/865994a0c7405666307f8857e1de9117b18054a2)
[6](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6944bbc66fc2d4e93290bb678e884a049714d504)
[7](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msd2.70040)
[8](https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18290)
[9](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22851)
[10](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3597569)
[11](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.00370.pdf)
[12](https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04729)
[13](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.09311.pdf)
[14](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.11742.pdf)
[15](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.03574.pdf)
[16](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.03307.pdf)
[17](https://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.2499.pdf)
[18](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.04951.pdf)
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8406981/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17499518.2023.2283857
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01101
https://cosmosscholars.com/phms/index.php/ijmst/article/view/3646
http://thesai.org/Publications/ViewPaper?Volume=15&Issue=2&Code=IJACSA&SerialNo=50
https://pubs.aip.org/adv/article/15/1/015019/3331446/A-cell-structure-implementation-of-the-multigrid
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09300
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7292621/
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10847432/
https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/762547
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.12375v1.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.10196.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.00832.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.00337.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01383.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.11742.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.18059.pdf
https://arxiv.org/html/2403.06503v1
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10827806/
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f168ddc0976913e07f7a5250d217e3548a048ce8
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10805012/
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05766
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10090
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d62cd2c02309400756528ac55bbb18e2b51f3f42
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12375
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2023/18248/
https://ijsshmr.com/v4i5/15.php
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01943
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.10196.pdf
https://arxiv.org/html/2308.09721v2
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01383.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.00832.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.15832.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.11742.pdf
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.14396.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.02249.pdf
[1](https://wmjournals.com/img/JPMIDT/WMJ-JPAIR-111-Performance-Comparison-of-Web-Assembly-and-JavaScript.pdf)
[2](https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=70951)
[3](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afb48baa46e317fc76ef78f0ce70a3687f60e79c)
[4](http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4842-4063-2_3)
[5](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f342c72f19c17fb6ec7ba5608b14d87690b1acf)
[6](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ba5e5ed2152aa20c0b39c8c69579b680f05812c)
[7](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10500141/)
[8](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3159450.3162344)
[9](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10271101/)
[10](http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4842-0064-3_20)
[11](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.04910.pdf)
[12](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1212.3879.pdf)
[13](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.11742.pdf)
[14](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.16853.pdf)
[15](https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1998-126-07/S0002-9939-98-04307-X/S0002-9939-98-04307-X.pdf)
[16](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.19397.pdf)
[17](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4567.pdf)
[18](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.08134.pdf)
[1](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d86171c22e2e935e3e4e6138662e81bdaa442ac)
[2](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af6a92cd7f30290fb7f3e3584f63c110dfba3638)
[3](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.13127.pdf)
[4](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.06375.pdf)
[5](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.12221.pdf)
[6](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.16853.pdf)
[7](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.06385.pdf)
[8](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.06156.pdf)
[9](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.01225.pdf)
[10](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.4351.pdf)
[1](https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/implementation-of-floatingpoint-arithmetic-coding-using-x8664-avx256-assembly-language.pdf)
[2](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207543.2023.2166622)
[3](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9797369/)
[4](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d2974477ee209094ade22d1434f0515f81dd227)
[5](https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/3/3/69)
[6](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9609f7f4528238601aeb150bd224674dbd5ee709)
[7](https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=70951)
[8](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10723802/)
[9](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11023411/)
[10](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19607)
[11](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.04910.pdf)
[12](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.02110.pdf)
[13](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2102.07485.pdf)
[14](https://www.qeios.com/read/definition/60379)
[15](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.14471.pdf)
[16](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.13828.pdf)
[17](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.16341.pdf)
[18](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.16853.pdf)
[1](https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/implementation-of-floatingpoint-arithmetic-coding-using-x8664-avx256-assembly-language.pdf)
[2](https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-64171-8_1)
[3](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3658644.3690244)
[4](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3711129.3711375)
[5](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10196727/)
[6](http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-26601-1_3)
[7](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9797369/)
[8](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d2974477ee209094ade22d1434f0515f81dd227)
[9](https://csecurity.kubg.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/140)
[10](https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/advs.202303832)
[11](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.04910.pdf)
[12](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.11017.pdf)
[13](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.19397.pdf)
[14](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.09311.pdf)
[15](http://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.00370.pdf)
[16](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.11742.pdf)
[17](https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1998-126-07/S0002-9939-98-04307-X/S0002-9939-98-04307-X.pdf)
[18](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.4567.pdf)
[1](https://wulixb.iphy.ac.cn/article/doi/10.7498/aps.67.20180375)
[2](http://lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/physics/article/view/3746)
[3](http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02739168)
[4](http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00615206)
[5](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51dc70f1e9b95e1d66c0ed0c9dab4fe5404ec92f)
[6](https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217984991001337)
[7](http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/223710/)
[8](http://link.springer.com/10.1134/1.1259650)
[9](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41052f149404538f1cba6e7c2de1ca6c6b20a469)
[10](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9568012/)
[11](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.05639.pdf)
[12](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jsid.1257)
[13](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.09805.pdf)
[14](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/adts.202000103)
[15](http://link.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043022)
[16](http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperDownload.aspx?paperID=8146)
[17](http://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.08656.pdf)
18
Files
IMG_3778.jpeg
Files
(6.0 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:aa408cedfd9b5ff5036d79252fb5fcb2
|
443.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:dab4fe18b046af569359d85e148ac63e
|
309.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:7b6600df85fed850fa27dedf1f3a93b2
|
229.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:c8e536955c5bcef491c6a83d09feffa7
|
209.0 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:07b3df7def50b4be6238387a9154efb3
|
192.6 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:085e362ad3771a2cc703e649587079c1
|
172.0 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:df06045717201033ed0d0786628f5ddd
|
241.6 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:c49461365bda641fc5ba1684d1cf6e5c
|
259.5 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:76666bcf00435b57407f76b5db144c0e
|
294.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:1b545fa13c3d3013620f7acfcf6389d4
|
351.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:1c88831189bc94064456410a9b40910d
|
313.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:805da1387ca4886c8367ff83d5fd6c7e
|
265.0 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:93b3901066ae00b5288460afff36f52e
|
351.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:c07e2ec9587de9a9bff5c648180e05a7
|
283.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:ac3ee18ed5dfdb29f57f66841d12c0a1
|
342.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:d6195a2c74cb85d9f9cc741a62990cfb
|
316.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:e12b8094f7cb295c25e09106abf745c3
|
298.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:c0cbe4499dd9f9ecce94b798eb8a4864
|
475.1 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:9eab562775c3bf4df95a5b596dcc3596
|
616.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Alternative title
- Details included