Published October 23, 2025
| Version v1
Conference paper
Open
THE LINGUODIDACTIC FEATURES OF TEACHING MILITARY TERMINOLOGY
Authors/Creators
- 1. Senior Researcher, Scientific-Practical Research Center, University of Public Security, Uzbekistan
Description
This article explores the linguodidactic characteristics of teaching military terminology to students of higher educational institutions. It examines the specific linguistic, stylistic, and communicative features of military vocabulary and highlights the methodological approaches that facilitate its effective acquisition. The research emphasizes the importance of contextual, functional, and comparative methods in teaching specialized terms. Findings demonstrate that integrating authentic materials, simulations, and interdisciplinary tasks enhances both linguistic competence and professional communication skills among cadets and military students.
Files
182-185.pdf
Files
(351.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:202a02ee25944710ade7787495f5f4f6
|
351.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1.Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge University Press. 2.Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University Press 3.Grucza, F. (2010). Specialized Languages and Terminologies in Professional Communication. De Gruyter. 4.Borisova, L. (2015). Teaching Military English: Context and Practice. Moscow Military Linguistics Press. 5.Alekseeva, N. (2019). Linguodidactic Strategies in Teaching Technical Terminology. Journal of Language Education, 15(3), 22–30. 6.Kuznetsova, E. (2020). Terminological Competence in ESP Education. Linguodidactic Studies, 12(1), 45–53. 7.NATO Documentation Center. (2022). Glossary of NATO Terminology. Brussels: NATO HQ. 8.Sarviniso, M. ROLE OF USING OUTSIDE CLASSROOM LEARNING IN TEACHING. Professor, Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Germany, 120. 9.Kurbanova, M. A. (2023). POSITIVE FACTORS IN THE USE OF INTERACTIVE METHODS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS (WITH THE FIELD OF INFLUENCE IN THE MILITARY FIELD) AND THE ROLE OF THE TEACHER. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS, 4(01), 1-7. 10.Kurbanova, M. A. (2023). POSITIVE FACTORS IN THE USE OF INTERACTIVE METHODS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS (WITH THE FIELD OF INFLUENCE IN THE MILITARY FIELD) AND THE ROLE OF THE TEACHER. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS, 4(01), 1-7.