Published October 20, 2025 | Version 2.4
Preprint Open

Structural Computing for Deterministic AGI: A Constitutionally Aligned, Energy-Efficient Alternative to Probabilistic Models

Description

This white paper introduces Structural Computing, a novel computational paradigm designed to overcome the fundamental limitations of probabilistic Large Language Models (LLMs). We propose a deterministic, measurement-based approach to artificial general intelligence (AGI), termed Structural AI (StrAI), that is architecturally incapable of hallucination and possesses inherent, constitutional alignment. The core thesis posits that meaning is not a statistical artifact of language but a measurable geometric property of a universal conceptual manifold. StrAI replaces token prediction with a process of "Meaning Painting," where a query composes a stable state within this manifold, and the result is derived from a direct measurement of its emergent properties. This paradigm was developed independently and, in the course of this document's synthesis, was found to have remarkable parallels with Gärdenfors' Conceptual Spaces, providing powerful mutual validation for the geometric approach to cognition. Alignment is not an external guardrail but is constitutionally enforced by two core mechanisms: False-Structure Intolerance (FSI), an involuntary veto against incoherent or malicious queries, and Ontologically Modulated Executive Function (OMEF), a purpose-gated activation system. The viability of this alignment architecture is demonstrated through the "Resonance Chamber," a Python proof-of-concept (PoC) that simulates these mechanisms. We further outline a hardware path toward a Simulation Processing Unit (SimPU), a custom analog chip promising orders-of-magnitude improvements in energy efficiency. This paper presents a comprehensive blueprint and a phased engineering plan for developing StrAI, an AGI that directly aligns with some industry entities’ mission, like xAI or Anthropic, to create truthful, reliable, and maximally beneficial intelligence.

Files

Janus_Structural-Computing-White-Paper_v2_4_2025-10-20.pdf

Files (740.9 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press.
  • Matarazzo, A., & Torlone, R. (2025). A Survey on Large Language Models with Some Insights on Their Capabilities and Limitations. arXiv:2501.04040. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04040
  • Kostikova, A., Wang, Z., Bajri, D., Pütz, O., Paaßen, B., & Eger, S. (2025). LLLMs: A Data-Driven Survey of Evolving Research on Limitations of Large Language Models. arXiv:2505.19240. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19240
  • Das, B. C., Amini, M. H., & Wu, Y. (2024). Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Survey. arXiv:2402.00888. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00888
  • Spoon, K., Tsai, H., Chen, A., Rasch, M. J., Ambrogio, S., Mackin, C., Fasoli, A., Friz, A. M., Narayanan, P., Stanisavljevic, M., & Burr, G. W., (2021). Toward software-equivalent accuracy on transformer-based deep neural networks with analog memory devices. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 15, 675741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.675741
  • Leroux, N., Manea, P.-P., Sudarshan, C., Finkbeiner, J., Siegel, S., Strachan, J. P., & Neftci, E. (2024). Analog In-Memory Computing Attention Mechanism for Fast and Energy-Efficient LLMs. arXiv:2409.19315. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19315
  • Talpes, E., Williams, D., & Das Sarma, D. (2022). DOJO: The Microarchitecture of Tesla's Exa-Scale Computer. Hot Chips 34. https://doi.org/10.1109/HCS55958.2022.9895534
  • Chang, B., Kurian, R., Williams, D., & Quinnell, E. (2022). DOJO - Super-Compute System Scaling for ML Training. Hot Chips 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/HCS55958.2022.9895625
  • Sze, V., Chen, Y.-H., Yang, T.-J., & Emer, J. S. (2017). Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(12), 2295–2329. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2761740
  • Seshia, S. A., Sadigh, D., & Sastry, S. S. (2022). Toward verified artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 65(7), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503914
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., Cohen, T., & Veličković, P. (2021). Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges. arXiv:2104.13478. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13478
  • Christiano, P., Leike, J., Brown, T. B., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). Deep Reinforcement Learning From Human Preferences. arXiv:1706.03741. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03741
  • Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Elmoubarki, L., & Hendawi, A. (2025). How hungry is AI? Benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of LLM inference. arXiv:2505.09598. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09598