Published September 15, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF KINESIO TAPING AND LOW-DYE TAPING FOR PLANTAR FASCIITIS: A TWO-WEEK RANDOMIZED TRIAL

  • 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Vinoba Bhave University

Description

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a prevalent source of heel pain linked to mechanical overload and faulty foot biomechanics. Taping is commonly used to offload the plantar fascia, yet head-to-head evidence comparing Kinesio taping (KT) with Low-Dye taping (LDT) is limited.

Objective: To compare short-term effects of KT and LDT—each combined with iontophoresis and stretching—on pain, stiffness, and function in adults with PF.

Methods: Forty-five participants (21–60 years; 14 females/31 males) meeting standard PF criteria were randomized into three groups (n=15/group): KT, LDT or control. All groups received 12 sessions over two weeks (6/week)  KT and LDT groups received taping plus acetic-acid iontophoresis (40 mA·min, up to 4 mA) and plantar fascia/calf stretching; controls received iontophoresis + stretching only. Outcomes were Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, VAS morning stiffness (MS) and VAS residual stiffness (RS) recorded at baseline, 1 week and 2 weeks. Statistics: paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons (α=0.05).

Results: All groups improved significantly within-group on most outcomes over 2 weeks (p ≤ 0.05). Between-group ANOVA showed significant differences favouring taping groups for PSFS at 2 weeks (F=6.67, p=0.03) and VAS-pain at 1 week (F=14.83, p<0.001) and 2 weeks (F=13.05, p<0.001). Between-group differences were not significant for MS at 2 weeks (p=0.12) or RS at 2 weeks (p=0.34)  Post-hoc analyses indicated KT ≈ LDT (no significant difference) while each outperformed control on pain and function. Minor tape-related skin irritation occurred in a few participants.

Conclusion: Over two weeks both KT and LDT—when combined with iontophoresis and stretching—yield superior short-term improvements in pain and function versus iontophoresis + stretching alone. KT and LDT were clinically comparable in this timeframe.

Files

78-Meraj Siddiqui - Print - IERJ250907467196.docx.pdf

Files (863.3 kB)

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Journal: 2454-9916 (EISSN)

References

  • Othman AMA, Ragab EM. Endoscopic plantar fasciotomy vs extracorporeal shock wave therapy… Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:1343–1347.
  • Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic Exercise, 5th ed. Ch. 22.
  • Osborne HR, Allison GT. Treatment of plantar fasciitis by Low-Dye taping and iontophoresis… Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:545–549.
  • Radford JA, Landorf KB, Buchbinder R, Cook C. Effectiveness of calf stretching… BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:36.
  • Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical Sports Medicine, 3rd ed., pp. 648–651.
  • Roxas M. Plantar fasciitis: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations. Altern Med Rev. 2005;10(2).
  • Buchbinder R. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2159–2166.
  • Middleton JA, Kolodin EL. Plantar fasciitis—heel pain in athletes. J Athl Train. 1992;27(1).
  • Singh D, et al. Plantar fasciitis. BMJ. 1997;315:172–175.
  • Bolgla LA, Malone TR. Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):77–82.